Originally posted by: palehorse74
but it's all 100% true.
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Deptacon
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
I've read a couple of articles regarding this where it was mentioned that some in his own organization informed on him. Does this mean that Al Qaeda wanted to get rid of him or that there were double agents in his group. It would be good news if it was the latter.
OBL did send a letter to Zarqawi after he bombed the hotel in Jordan killing a lot of people telling him that killing muslims was bad.
i bet OBL had a role in this and had the USAF snuff him out.
momma always said, DONT SMOKE CRACK
Guess you shoulda listened to momma:
The Short, Violent Life of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200607/z...fhaPsPg%2B9E5USZvqSqBDKyXpAE9U9Gsng%3D
Please do and read the whole thing. Might take you a while but please do try.
Zarqawi Scheduled for Martyrdom
http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htmurph/articles/20060607.aspx
And to think the Propagandist could have had Zarqawi 4 years ago
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200605/s1627197.htm
and more...Originally posted by: conjur
Give me a fvcking break.
Zarqawi is a myth.
yayy for personal insults and original comebacks!Originally posted by: Steeplerot
Originally posted by: palehorse74
but it's all 100% true.
We are sure it is counterstrike boi. Really. We are.
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Deptacon
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
I've read a couple of articles regarding this where it was mentioned that some in his own organization informed on him. Does this mean that Al Qaeda wanted to get rid of him or that there were double agents in his group. It would be good news if it was the latter.
OBL did send a letter to Zarqawi after he bombed the hotel in Jordan killing a lot of people telling him that killing muslims was bad.
i bet OBL had a role in this and had the USAF snuff him out.
momma always said, DONT SMOKE CRACK
Guess you shoulda listened to momma:
The Short, Violent Life of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200607/z...fhaPsPg%2B9E5USZvqSqBDKyXpAE9U9Gsng%3D
Please do and read the whole thing. Might take you a while but please do try.
Zarqawi Scheduled for Martyrdom
http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htmurph/articles/20060607.aspx
And to think the Propagandist could have had Zarqawi 4 years ago
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200605/s1627197.htm
I thought he was a myth?
and more...Originally posted by: conjur
Give me a fvcking break.
Zarqawi is a myth.
Originally posted by: palehorse74
lol, i love seeing Conjie get owned... it never gets old!
yet AGAIN with the personal insults... is that all you know how to do?Originally posted by: Steeplerot
Originally posted by: palehorse74
lol, i love seeing Conjie get owned... it never gets old!
From a real iraqi instead of a wanna-be e-soldier
Last week, Zarqawi urged that Sunnis go to war against Shiites. Do you think his death will quell the sectarian violence or spur more attacks on Shiites?
I think the sectarian violence is already well underway. His work was done. He?d accomplished his mission. He had turbocharged the sectarian tensions in Iraq and humiliated the Americans by his highly publicized outrageous attacks. Lastly, he put Al Qaeda back on the map. I presume those were his three main objectives, and it seems to me that he had already done whatever damage in those areas he was going to do. I agree with the observers who say that Zarqawi planned to move on.
To where?
Since before the invasion of Iraq, he was working on establishing networks in Europe. If there?s any difference in response to the welcome demise of Zarqawi, it might well be in Europe. His death might set back the formation of networks in Europe to which he had devoted himself quite assiduously for several years.
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Deptacon
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
I've read a couple of articles regarding this where it was mentioned that some in his own organization informed on him. Does this mean that Al Qaeda wanted to get rid of him or that there were double agents in his group. It would be good news if it was the latter.
OBL did send a letter to Zarqawi after he bombed the hotel in Jordan killing a lot of people telling him that killing muslims was bad.
i bet OBL had a role in this and had the USAF snuff him out.
momma always said, DONT SMOKE CRACK
Guess you shoulda listened to momma:
The Short, Violent Life of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200607/z...fhaPsPg%2B9E5USZvqSqBDKyXpAE9U9Gsng%3D
Please do and read the whole thing. Might take you a while but please do try.
Zarqawi Scheduled for Martyrdom
http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htmurph/articles/20060607.aspx
And to think the Propagandist could have had Zarqawi 4 years ago
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200605/s1627197.htm
I thought he was a myth?
and more...Originally posted by: conjur
Give me a fvcking break.
Zarqawi is a myth.
?Even then?and even more so now?Zarqawi was not the main force in the insurgency,? the former Jordanian intelligence official, who has studied al-Zarqawi for a decade, told me. ?To establish himself, he carried out the Muhammad Hakim operation, and the attack against the UN. Both of them gained a lot of support for him?with the tribes, with Saddam?s army and other remnants of his regime. They made Zarqawi the symbol of the resistance in Iraq, but not the leader. And he never has been.?
He continued, ?The Americans have been patently stupid in all of this. They?ve blown Zarqawi so out of proportion that, of course, his prestige has grown. And as a result, sleeper cells from all over Europe are coming to join him now.? He paused for a moment, then said, ?Your government is creating a self-fulfilling prophecy.?
Western and Israeli diplomats to whom I spoke shared this view?and this past April, The Washington Post reported on Pentagon documents that detailed a U.S. military propaganda campaign to inflate al-Zarqawi?s importance.
Originally posted by: Slicedbread
ABC news saying that the U.S. government carried out a bombing run and killed him, his spiritual advisor and others.
Originally posted by: eits
i was expecting this to happen. wait a few more months when bush's approval ratings dip even lower... you'll find another dead high-ranking official.
the government knows where everybody is... i guarantee it. they just wait until it's the most opportune moment to take them out. i don't think the governement even really WANTS to take them out... i think the government knows how essential it is to america that these high-ranking terrorist officials remain alive and plotting. it's all about manipulation.
whenever bush's ratings went lower last week, he tried bringing up the gay marriage ban issue to try and rally support within his party.... that failed. so, he did the next best thing... he made sure that we killed a big shot "bad guy."
think about it.... saddam? saddam's sons? saddam's 2nd in command? some al-qaeda high-ranking official? al-zarqawi? before every one of those kills, bush's approval ratings were taking a swan dive and bush tried using hot topic, party-rallying rhetoric like gay marriage, abortion, activist judges, the whole katrina thing.... whenever both sides are starting to hate you, you gotta make a statement about something that you KNOW your party will back you up on, thus helping your approval ratings. when that doesn't work, you kill someone important.
clinton did the same thing, kinda. he bombed a location in sudan where he believed bin laden was having a meeting with his little terrorist buddies. that was during the time of him getting caught with the whole lewinsky thing.
personally, i don't trust this administration one iota... in fact, i don't believe for a second that we even want the terrorists dead. i think it's all just a big manipulation act in order to gain control ain the middle east through smoke and mirrors. if we were trying to kill terrorists, why do we pay for their training? why do we waste tax dollars paying for both sides of the war on terror? it's all manipulation.... unfortunately, people are falling for it, especially people who end up becoming terrorists... i think that's why we're doing what we're doing.... to ensure a steady flow of terrorist recruits. that way, we've got a "noble" cause and we have a "right" to do whatever the hell we please in the heart of oilville. as long as our tax dollars keep manufacturing terrorists, we'll be able to stomp all over the middle east raking in money and oil...
Originally posted by: eits
i was expecting this to happen. wait a few more months when bush's approval ratings dip even lower... you'll find another dead high-ranking official.
the government knows where everybody is... i guarantee it. they just wait until it's the most opportune moment to take them out. i don't think the governement even really WANTS to take them out... i think the government knows how essential it is to america that these high-ranking terrorist officials remain alive and plotting. it's all about manipulation.
whenever bush's ratings went lower last week, he tried bringing up the gay marriage ban issue to try and rally support within his party.... that failed. so, he did the next best thing... he made sure that we killed a big shot "bad guy."
think about it.... saddam? saddam's sons? saddam's 2nd in command? some al-qaeda high-ranking official? al-zarqawi? before every one of those kills, bush's approval ratings were taking a swan dive and bush tried using hot topic, party-rallying rhetoric like gay marriage, abortion, activist judges, the whole katrina thing.... whenever both sides are starting to hate you, you gotta make a statement about something that you KNOW your party will back you up on, thus helping your approval ratings. when that doesn't work, you kill someone important.
clinton did the same thing, kinda. he bombed a location in sudan where he believed bin laden was having a meeting with his little terrorist buddies. that was during the time of him getting caught with the whole lewinsky thing.
personally, i don't trust this administration one iota... in fact, i don't believe for a second that we even want the terrorists dead. i think it's all just a big manipulation act in order to gain control ain the middle east through smoke and mirrors. if we were trying to kill terrorists, why do we pay for their training? why do we waste tax dollars paying for both sides of the war on terror? it's all manipulation.... unfortunately, people are falling for it, especially people who end up becoming terrorists... i think that's why we're doing what we're doing.... to ensure a steady flow of terrorist recruits. that way, we've got a "noble" cause and we have a "right" to do whatever the hell we please in the heart of oilville. as long as our tax dollars keep manufacturing terrorists, we'll be able to stomp all over the middle east raking in money and oil...
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: eits
i was expecting this to happen. wait a few more months when bush's approval ratings dip even lower... you'll find another dead high-ranking official.
the government knows where everybody is... i guarantee it. they just wait until it's the most opportune moment to take them out. i don't think the governement even really WANTS to take them out... i think the government knows how essential it is to america that these high-ranking terrorist officials remain alive and plotting. it's all about manipulation.
whenever bush's ratings went lower last week, he tried bringing up the gay marriage ban issue to try and rally support within his party.... that failed. so, he did the next best thing... he made sure that we killed a big shot "bad guy."
think about it.... saddam? saddam's sons? saddam's 2nd in command? some al-qaeda high-ranking official? al-zarqawi? before every one of those kills, bush's approval ratings were taking a swan dive and bush tried using hot topic, party-rallying rhetoric like gay marriage, abortion, activist judges, the whole katrina thing.... whenever both sides are starting to hate you, you gotta make a statement about something that you KNOW your party will back you up on, thus helping your approval ratings. when that doesn't work, you kill someone important.
clinton did the same thing, kinda. he bombed a location in sudan where he believed bin laden was having a meeting with his little terrorist buddies. that was during the time of him getting caught with the whole lewinsky thing.
personally, i don't trust this administration one iota... in fact, i don't believe for a second that we even want the terrorists dead. i think it's all just a big manipulation act in order to gain control ain the middle east through smoke and mirrors. if we were trying to kill terrorists, why do we pay for their training? why do we waste tax dollars paying for both sides of the war on terror? it's all manipulation.... unfortunately, people are falling for it, especially people who end up becoming terrorists... i think that's why we're doing what we're doing.... to ensure a steady flow of terrorist recruits. that way, we've got a "noble" cause and we have a "right" to do whatever the hell we please in the heart of oilville. as long as our tax dollars keep manufacturing terrorists, we'll be able to stomp all over the middle east raking in money and oil...
You must hate being in a firm Red state.
isnt it time for you to get a new tinfoil hat?Originally posted by: eits
i was expecting this to happen. wait a few more months when bush's approval ratings dip even lower... you'll find another dead high-ranking official.
the government knows where everybody is... i guarantee it. they just wait until it's the most opportune moment to take them out. i don't think the governement even really WANTS to take them out... i think the government knows how essential it is to america that these high-ranking terrorist officials remain alive and plotting. it's all about manipulation.
whenever bush's ratings went lower last week, he tried bringing up the gay marriage ban issue to try and rally support within his party.... that failed. so, he did the next best thing... he made sure that we killed a big shot "bad guy."
think about it.... saddam? saddam's sons? saddam's 2nd in command? some al-qaeda high-ranking official? al-zarqawi? before every one of those kills, bush's approval ratings were taking a swan dive and bush tried using hot topic, party-rallying rhetoric like gay marriage, abortion, activist judges, the whole katrina thing.... whenever both sides are starting to hate you, you gotta make a statement about something that you KNOW your party will back you up on, thus helping your approval ratings. when that doesn't work, you kill someone important.
clinton did the same thing, kinda. he bombed a location in sudan where he believed bin laden was having a meeting with his little terrorist buddies. that was during the time of him getting caught with the whole lewinsky thing.
personally, i don't trust this administration one iota... in fact, i don't believe for a second that we even want the terrorists dead. i think it's all just a big manipulation act in order to gain control ain the middle east through smoke and mirrors. if we were trying to kill terrorists, why do we pay for their training? why do we waste tax dollars paying for both sides of the war on terror? it's all manipulation.... unfortunately, people are falling for it, especially people who end up becoming terrorists... i think that's why we're doing what we're doing.... to ensure a steady flow of terrorist recruits. that way, we've got a "noble" cause and we have a "right" to do whatever the hell we please in the heart of oilville. as long as our tax dollars keep manufacturing terrorists, we'll be able to stomp all over the middle east raking in money and oil...
dude shouldn't' you be getting your rest?Originally posted by: palehorse74
isnt it time for you to get a new tinfoil hat?Originally posted by: eits
i was expecting this to happen. wait a few more months when bush's approval ratings dip even lower... you'll find another dead high-ranking official.
the government knows where everybody is... i guarantee it. they just wait until it's the most opportune moment to take them out. i don't think the governement even really WANTS to take them out... i think the government knows how essential it is to america that these high-ranking terrorist officials remain alive and plotting. it's all about manipulation.
whenever bush's ratings went lower last week, he tried bringing up the gay marriage ban issue to try and rally support within his party.... that failed. so, he did the next best thing... he made sure that we killed a big shot "bad guy."
think about it.... saddam? saddam's sons? saddam's 2nd in command? some al-qaeda high-ranking official? al-zarqawi? before every one of those kills, bush's approval ratings were taking a swan dive and bush tried using hot topic, party-rallying rhetoric like gay marriage, abortion, activist judges, the whole katrina thing.... whenever both sides are starting to hate you, you gotta make a statement about something that you KNOW your party will back you up on, thus helping your approval ratings. when that doesn't work, you kill someone important.
clinton did the same thing, kinda. he bombed a location in sudan where he believed bin laden was having a meeting with his little terrorist buddies. that was during the time of him getting caught with the whole lewinsky thing.
personally, i don't trust this administration one iota... in fact, i don't believe for a second that we even want the terrorists dead. i think it's all just a big manipulation act in order to gain control ain the middle east through smoke and mirrors. if we were trying to kill terrorists, why do we pay for their training? why do we waste tax dollars paying for both sides of the war on terror? it's all manipulation.... unfortunately, people are falling for it, especially people who end up becoming terrorists... i think that's why we're doing what we're doing.... to ensure a steady flow of terrorist recruits. that way, we've got a "noble" cause and we have a "right" to do whatever the hell we please in the heart of oilville. as long as our tax dollars keep manufacturing terrorists, we'll be able to stomp all over the middle east raking in money and oil...
Originally posted by: palehorse74
isnt it time for you to get a new tinfoil hat?Originally posted by: eits
i was expecting this to happen. wait a few more months when bush's approval ratings dip even lower... you'll find another dead high-ranking official.
the government knows where everybody is... i guarantee it. they just wait until it's the most opportune moment to take them out. i don't think the governement even really WANTS to take them out... i think the government knows how essential it is to america that these high-ranking terrorist officials remain alive and plotting. it's all about manipulation.
whenever bush's ratings went lower last week, he tried bringing up the gay marriage ban issue to try and rally support within his party.... that failed. so, he did the next best thing... he made sure that we killed a big shot "bad guy."
think about it.... saddam? saddam's sons? saddam's 2nd in command? some al-qaeda high-ranking official? al-zarqawi? before every one of those kills, bush's approval ratings were taking a swan dive and bush tried using hot topic, party-rallying rhetoric like gay marriage, abortion, activist judges, the whole katrina thing.... whenever both sides are starting to hate you, you gotta make a statement about something that you KNOW your party will back you up on, thus helping your approval ratings. when that doesn't work, you kill someone important.
clinton did the same thing, kinda. he bombed a location in sudan where he believed bin laden was having a meeting with his little terrorist buddies. that was during the time of him getting caught with the whole lewinsky thing.
personally, i don't trust this administration one iota... in fact, i don't believe for a second that we even want the terrorists dead. i think it's all just a big manipulation act in order to gain control ain the middle east through smoke and mirrors. if we were trying to kill terrorists, why do we pay for their training? why do we waste tax dollars paying for both sides of the war on terror? it's all manipulation.... unfortunately, people are falling for it, especially people who end up becoming terrorists... i think that's why we're doing what we're doing.... to ensure a steady flow of terrorist recruits. that way, we've got a "noble" cause and we have a "right" to do whatever the hell we please in the heart of oilville. as long as our tax dollars keep manufacturing terrorists, we'll be able to stomp all over the middle east raking in money and oil...
because of the aliens who taught the US government all about mind control!.... and the fact that they're probably coming to get YOU next!...Originally posted by: eits
Originally posted by: palehorse74
isnt it time for you to get a new tinfoil hat?Originally posted by: eits
i was expecting this to happen. wait a few more months when bush's approval ratings dip even lower... you'll find another dead high-ranking official.
the government knows where everybody is... i guarantee it. they just wait until it's the most opportune moment to take them out. i don't think the governement even really WANTS to take them out... i think the government knows how essential it is to america that these high-ranking terrorist officials remain alive and plotting. it's all about manipulation.
whenever bush's ratings went lower last week, he tried bringing up the gay marriage ban issue to try and rally support within his party.... that failed. so, he did the next best thing... he made sure that we killed a big shot "bad guy."
think about it.... saddam? saddam's sons? saddam's 2nd in command? some al-qaeda high-ranking official? al-zarqawi? before every one of those kills, bush's approval ratings were taking a swan dive and bush tried using hot topic, party-rallying rhetoric like gay marriage, abortion, activist judges, the whole katrina thing.... whenever both sides are starting to hate you, you gotta make a statement about something that you KNOW your party will back you up on, thus helping your approval ratings. when that doesn't work, you kill someone important.
clinton did the same thing, kinda. he bombed a location in sudan where he believed bin laden was having a meeting with his little terrorist buddies. that was during the time of him getting caught with the whole lewinsky thing.
personally, i don't trust this administration one iota... in fact, i don't believe for a second that we even want the terrorists dead. i think it's all just a big manipulation act in order to gain control ain the middle east through smoke and mirrors. if we were trying to kill terrorists, why do we pay for their training? why do we waste tax dollars paying for both sides of the war on terror? it's all manipulation.... unfortunately, people are falling for it, especially people who end up becoming terrorists... i think that's why we're doing what we're doing.... to ensure a steady flow of terrorist recruits. that way, we've got a "noble" cause and we have a "right" to do whatever the hell we please in the heart of oilville. as long as our tax dollars keep manufacturing terrorists, we'll be able to stomp all over the middle east raking in money and oil...
??? why would i need a tinfoil hat? you're silly...