We see this ridiculous argument that not even slightest restriction should be introduced because it will sure lead to complete ban and take away everyone's freedom. Yeah? Then why do we have any law and punishment at all, cause with that logic, any slight punishment would lead to death sentence for all and sending all people to death row. Some of these gun nutz should wake up and see what kind of idiotic arguments they are coming out with.
It's called a slippery slope. Once the people have acknowledged the right of the state to regulate guns in one way, then the door is wide open for more restrictive bans. With regards to guns in the US, that is exactly what has happened:
1934 NFA - regulate select-fire, SBR's, silencers
1968 GCA - institute FFL system, ban interstate sales, ban mail-order sales, regulate "large" calibers
1984 FOPA - close off select-fire registry entirely
1992 import ban - ban all foreign imports that don't meet a bunch of arbitrary regulations (look up 922r if you're interested)
1994 "assault weapon" ban - already discussed, just bans a bunch of red herring features that would have paved the way to more bans if it didn't expire
The same thing happened in the UK and Australia by the way.
Note that all this legislation were ruled "constitutional" under the Commerce Clause, which of course has nothing to do with guns. Nothing more than a massive power grab by the feds. Also important to note is that all these regulations were instituted after some sort of violent event that scared the people into accepting them. The most egregious one was the 1934 NFA which was driven by Prohibition violence, something that the government itself created with their asinine Puritanism.
You should really shut the fuck up now, you're giving us Asians a bad name. Haven't seen a single coherent argument from you on why more gun control will have any effect whatsoever, just a bunch of childish insults against gun owners.