Originally posted by: OcHungry
Originally posted by: madoka
Originally posted by: coldpower27
You could also buy the Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 and overclock that to maybe 2.6GHZ and have it beat the Athlon 64x2 3800+ pretty easily.
Comparing a stock processor to and overclocked one is a worthless comparison.
I was thinking about replying to this guy too, but realized he'd probably be too clueless to understand anyway.
His post reminds me of a post this past week on fatwallet by another clueless user regarding the difference between socket 754 and 939:
"I think 939 is the socket type. The (S939) 3000+ CPU fits both sockets so I think it's the same CPU. Socket 754 is Nvidia chipset 3 while 939 is the latter one (better) chipset 4."
Clueless? is that best you cando?
I was comparing an AM2 3800 x2 overclocked to 2.8ghz stock vcore (notice stock vcore), All of that for less than $300. Your beloved conroe cant reach it.
Oh I hear another delay on con-roe, because Intel cant produce them ES cherry picked, hand crafted processors been giving to their ass kissers, and is quagmire what to do w/ it. I get a big laugh when I hear them announce that they concede to AM2's just as they have to IMC technology.
Go and do your spi 1m 24/7 while I am playing w/ my SLI AM2's without loosing my pants.
Oh have you heard? Nvedia says conroe is bottleneck so no SLI for you Intel.
heheh. Maybe ATI will make some vid card and calls it conroe's special. but wait, AMD is buying ATI-what a bummer.
EDIT: If you wanna P off Conroe lovers, just say the word "FSB"