During the Epstein trial did none of the girls testify to having sex with any prominent person?
ChatGPT doesn't know.
ChatGPT doesn't know.
Because he could also have been coerced into suicide and/or been deliberately provided the means with which to commit suicide, which to me is functionally the same thing.
Does she have video as Epstein was rumored to have? Other records?
Her saying things isn't great, but that's a long, long way from actually having the goods on these people.
I think there are lots of ways you can coerce someone into killing themselves. Also, deliberate indifference to a potentially problematic but suicidal person is still absolutely a gigantic scandal.Sure, my point is that the camera evidence rules out a homicide. No one can prove whether the guards fell asleep or just intentionally didn't watch him, hoping he would commit suicide. It's not such a great conspiracy, however, if they relied on Epstein to kill himself. I don't see how they can "coerce" him to do it, though.
That seems unlikely to ever happen.I'd like to see these videos that Epstein supposedly had. Rumors are not terribly useful.
I think there are lots of ways you can coerce someone into killing themselves. Also, deliberate indifference to a potentially problematic but suicidal person is still absolutely a gigantic scandal.
That seems unlikely to ever happen.
Depends on why they were deliberately indifferent, no?A gigantic scandal, sure. The guards were fired and prosecuted. But it's not much of a conspiracy, if that's really what it was.
Depends on why they were deliberately indifferent, no?
I'm confident we will never know - I do find the totality of the circumstances very suspicious though.Sorry, I had not taken proper note of your word "deliberate" there. If it WAS deliberate, they might have been paid off, by someone just hoping Epstein would kill himself if the guards didn't do their jobs. Or maybe the guards thought screw him, he's a serial child molester, so we're not going to protect him. Or maybe it wasn't deliberate. The video does show them apparently sleeping on the job. I wonder how many other videos from other nights would show them doing the same thing? I don't know that any of the investigations pulled videos of other nights, but it strikes me as relevant whether or not they had a pattern of sleeping on the job.
But why would allowing Hamas to slaughter more than 1,000 people help Netanyahu?Netanyahu purposely relaxed Israel's security apparatus thus virtually baiting Hamas into launching its terrorist attack at a moment in time in the world when it was advantageous for them to do so.
Huh...I thought everyone agreed that's what happened, including the citizens who elected that turd.Netanyahu purposely relaxed Israel's security apparatus thus virtually baiting Hamas into launching its terrorist attack at a moment in time in the world when it was advantageous for them to do so.
Yes, it truly has backfired.But why would allowing Hamas to slaughter more than 1,000 people help Netanyahu?
Is the idea that it would allow him to remain in power until the war is over? If so, this whole thing seems to have demolished his base of support so it has backfired.
Netanyahu purposely relaxed Israel's security apparatus thus virtually baiting Hamas into launching its terrorist attack at a moment in time in the world when it was advantageous for them to do so.
I think there's substantial evidence that Netanyahu tolerated or even actively supported Hamas in order to keep the Palestinian governing authorities divided but I haven't seen anything that would indicate to me he purposefully allowed this attack to happen.Yes, it truly has backfired.
He was against a 2 state solution. The Palestinian Authority gaining power and credibility was a threat so he funded Hamas to continue dissention.But why would allowing Hamas to slaughter more than 1,000 people help Netanyahu?
Is the idea that it would allow him to remain in power until the war is over? If so, this whole thing seems to have demolished his base of support so it has backfired.
It also took them 8 hours to respond. IMO Bibi wanted this as excuse to wipe out the Palestinians.Netanyahu purposely relaxed Israel's security apparatus thus virtually baiting Hamas into launching its terrorist attack at a moment in time in the world when it was advantageous for them to do so.
I agree that's likely the case. There's a big difference between that and purposefully allowing 1,000 people to be killed though.He was against a 2 state solution. The Palestinian Authority gaining power and credibility was a threat so he funded Hamas to continue dissention.
Wait...I thought we were supposed to post conspiracy/wacky beliefs in this thread. Now you're going all evidence-based?I think there's substantial evidence that Netanyahu tolerated or even actively supported Hamas in order to keep the Palestinian governing authorities divided but I haven't seen anything that would indicate to me he purposefully allowed this attack to happen.
To the OP: That we live in a simulation.
Unlikely to be anywhere near as 'personal' as that. Likely just one of a million instances launched for studying/harvesting information on something.And our entire existence is being a coppertop?
View attachment 91646
True to an extent..
0 - 24 get an education (get charged up)
24 - 64 work 3 jobs trying to chase a dream of getting ahead (discharge)
64 - 74 retire, travel if you can (squeeze out the last bit)
74 - end up in a nursing home or with a home health aide (recycle)