Rant Conspiracy theories/ Crazy thoughts -- Post your whackiest beliefs in here that no one agrees with WITHOUT REGRETS!

Page 51 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Jul 27, 2020
17,895
11,679
116
It is crucial, women should absolutely be shown that you can be without a partner or child and still be successful and happy.
Nothing against a woman choosing that as an option for herself. But promoting it as the best option (which is what the proponents seem to do) is kinda rife with potentially harmful ramifications related to the future of the human race. If this catches on, what do we do? Start creating babies in incubators to continue the human race? Biologically alter humans so that gender as a distinctive feature disappears and humans are just cloned as needed?

I've seen shorts of two female youtubers (a girl and a woman, don't remember their names) where they tell girls how to appreciate their man more and they get millions of views (probably more from men than women). I find it funny when an individual of a gender that is supposed to be the emasculated one, starts lecturing her peers sharing her gender about the dangers of messing with the heads of the other gender and how this will hurt them more in the end. There is a fine line between appreciating your partner more and being too submissive to the point of being a slave, that girls/women have trouble figuring out.
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
26,648
24,933
136
Nothing against a woman choosing that as an option for herself. But promoting it as the best option (which is what the proponents seem to do) is kinda rife with potentially harmful ramifications related to the future of the human race. If this catches on, what do we do? Start creating babies in incubators to continue the human race? Biologically alter humans so that gender as a distinctive feature disappears and humans are just cloned as needed?

I've seen shorts of two female youtubers (a girl and a woman, don't remember their names) where they tell girls how to appreciate their man more and they get millions of views (probably more from men than women). I find it funny when an individual of a gender that is supposed to be the emasculated one, starts lecturing her peers sharing her gender about the dangers of messing with the heads of the other gender and how this will hurt them more in the end. There is a fine line between appreciating your partner more and being too submissive to the point of being a slave, that girls/women have trouble figuring out.

Wat
 
Reactions: [DHT]Osiris

Indus

Lifer
May 11, 2002
10,397
7,036
136

I thought Pioneer was a japanese company!

Either way glad I haven't bought anything Pioneer in a while!
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
96,139
15,766
126

I thought Pioneer was a japanese company!

Either way glad I haven't bought anything Pioneer in a while!

That is just American propaganda aimed at destabilizing China. China is opening up for tourism and if you go visit you'll see the rocket is fine. /Nexus5

Also, Space Pioneer is the name of the company. Nothing to do with electronics company Pioneer.

 
Last edited:

Indus

Lifer
May 11, 2002
10,397
7,036
136
That test seems dangerously close to civilians.

Also, even if there were casualties, there were no casualties. Understand?

You don't say!

Trump and MAGA will soon take a page out of their book and say what migrants? We're not importing migrants, we're importing fertilizer and human organs for transplant!
 
Reactions: igor_kavinski

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
14,598
12,727
146
Nothing against a woman choosing that as an option for herself. But promoting it as the best option (which is what the proponents seem to do) is kinda rife with potentially harmful ramifications related to the future of the human race. If this catches on, what do we do? Start creating babies in incubators to continue the human race? Biologically alter humans so that gender as a distinctive feature disappears and humans are just cloned as needed?

I've seen shorts of two female youtubers (a girl and a woman, don't remember their names) where they tell girls how to appreciate their man more and they get millions of views (probably more from men than women). I find it funny when an individual of a gender that is supposed to be the emasculated one, starts lecturing her peers sharing her gender about the dangers of messing with the heads of the other gender and how this will hurt them more in the end. There is a fine line between appreciating your partner more and being too submissive to the point of being a slave, that girls/women have trouble figuring out.
Ah man, I'm not even really sure where to start with that.

Let's just go with 'nobody suggested it was best, just do what makes you happy' and 'women are not baby factories' and leave it there, yeah?
 
Reactions: igor_kavinski
Jul 27, 2020
17,895
11,679
116
'women are not baby factories'
I've been told by at least one woman that once you go through the whole pregnancy thing, there are aspects of it that you love (maybe she was talking about the orgasms because blood flow increases three fold?) but she didn't elaborate coz she was the uptight type and would only say that if she could, she would do it over and over again.
 
Reactions: iRONic

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
26,648
24,933
136
I've been told by at least one woman that once you go through the whole pregnancy thing, there are aspects of it that you love (maybe she was talking about the orgasms because blood flow increases three fold?) but she didn't elaborate coz she was the uptight type and would only say that if she could, she would do it over and over again.
Huh
 
Reactions: [DHT]Osiris

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
23,531
13,104
136
I think we've always known twitter/ instagram is basically parroting stupid shit to promote engagement and clicks like this:


But what if news media like the NYT is basically that.. "Replace Biden".. seriously?

Seems they post the most stupid shit and expect us to either agree or disagree via posting vociferously driving up their sub numbers.
Shit @Young Grasshopper number 14 second row from the left !!!!!!!!!!
 
Jul 27, 2020
17,895
11,679
116
This statement tells me you have no clue what motivates a woman to choose to have kids or not.
You cannot have a general reason for women to want kids. Everyone has a different reason.

I want to have a kid because:

It will cement my relationship with this hot dude!
His family will approve of me more!
I love kids!
My partner will love me more!
My partner wants kids and he may end the relationship if I don't agree!
All my friends have kids and I don't. What's wrong with me? Gotta have a kid!
KIDS KIDS KIDS! The world can't have enough kids! Kids are wonderful and I want to be a baby factory!

Those are all VALID reasons.
 

Greenman

Lifer
Oct 15, 1999
20,631
5,315
136
Ah man, I'm not even really sure where to start with that.

Let's just go with 'nobody suggested it was best, just do what makes you happy' and 'women are not baby factories' and leave it there, yeah?
They have the raw material, the equipment, the production line, the distribution, and the marketing. I think they are indeed baby factories.
 
Reactions: igor_kavinski

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
24,840
9,083
136
After the latest SCOTUS ruling redefining the limits of constitutional law and granting POTUS absolute, UNQUESTIONABLE, immunity for official acts, it’s hard not to believe that this whole thing was a setup. I’m talking about the Trump presidency sum total. The Heritage Foundation along with a not-so-secret cabal of donors is to blame.

Go back to 2000 and Gore v. Bush. SCOTUS essentially flexed their power to decide an election. While most of the general public was keen to move on without questioning their motives, the Heritage Foundation saw an opportunity. Stack the courts with enough judges thinking the same way, and you’d never lose an election ever again! So they used 8 years of GWB’s presidency to get John Roberts installed as Chief Justice and set aside their blueprint for conservative domination.

My timing is likely off, but it’s about the end result, so bear with me:

First—unlimited dark money for campaigns and ensuring the “free speech” rights of corporations and billionaires to dominate unions and the ordinary American’s (Citizens United; McCutcheon v. FEC; Janus etc.) While the goal may have been to ensure a limited set of cronies control over the conservative agenda and candidates for all positions, it had a beneficial side effect. It effectively crippled grass roots progressive liberals from challenging the Democratic Party’s moneyed class as well. Of course, Barack Obama was the exception who slipped through, which is why Heritage Foundation/JBS went full panic Tea Party mode almost immediately.

Second—attack the voting rights of poor (largely black) Americans (Shelby v. Holder; Abbott v. Perez; Husted; Rucho etc.), to ensure a populist uprising against their moneyed overlords would be thwarted. Now elected officials can choose their voters and purge those who don’t vote for them at will, while ensuring that only the candidates who bend over backwards for the donor class are funded (and not some idealistic liberal or conservative spouting on about actual policy!)

Some of these decisions were rendered after Trump was already in office and had cemented the Heritage Foundation’s majority—so what of Trump himself? Well, let’s just say he was a means to an end. A “useful idiot”. Why was his candidacy allowed to prevail in the GOP primary? Why did all his opponents bow and kiss the ring in the end? Because they knew it was all a sham.

Trump was put in power to test the limits of democracy and the court system. It was seen as inevitable that he would run afoul of the law somewhere, somehow, because he just couldn’t help himself. Whether or not he was just a self-serving narcissist or compromised foreign asset was immaterial—he was a test run to see how the 3 branches of government would respond to his errors. His donors and handlers [i.e. Bannon] didn’t really care whether he gained a second term or ended up in jail—he was ultimately expendable. He was meant to test and expose the strengths and weaknesses of the state to check him—and once exposed, those strengths could be checked and weaknesses exploited by the Heritage-stacked courts. That’s where we are today.

So with today’s decision in Trump v. United States—it isn’t Trump who won. It’s the Heritage Foundation and the donor class moving to the 3rd stage of the battle plan. After they are already assured of getting their candidates funded and elected, they now have the blueprint to absolute power. So remember, it’s not about getting Trump a second term (that’s a side benefit.) It’s all about the true authoritarian they want to install after Trump.

Edit: I primarily refer to Heritage Foundation but that includes everyone from the Federalist Society, John Birch et al up to and including their latest offshoot, the “American Accountability Foundation”. The Enemy is Legion, and hides behind many names.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: hal2kilo and iRONic

nakedfrog

No Lifer
Apr 3, 2001
58,530
12,827
136
After the latest SCOTUS ruling redefining the limits of constitutional law and granting POTUS absolute, UNQUESTIONABLE, immunity for official acts, it’s hard not to believe that this whole thing was a setup. I’m talking about the Trump presidency sum total. The Heritage Foundation along with a not-so-secret cabal of donors is to blame.

Go back to 2000 and Gore v. Bush. SCOTUS essentially flexed their power to decide an election. While most of the general public was keen to move on without questioning their motives, the Heritage Foundation saw an opportunity. Stack the courts with enough judges thinking the same way, and you’d never lose an election ever again! So they used 8 years of GWB’s presidency to get John Roberts installed as Chief Justice and set aside their blueprint for conservative domination.

My timing is likely off, but it’s about the end result, so bear with me:

First—unlimited dark money for campaigns and ensuring the “free speech” rights of corporations and billionaires to dominate unions and the ordinary American’s (Citizens United; McCutcheon v. FEC; Janus etc.) While the goal may have been to ensure a limited set of cronies control over the conservative agenda and candidates for all positions, it had a beneficial side effect. It effectively crippled grass roots progressive liberals from challenging the Democratic Party’s moneyed class as well. Of course, Barack Obama was the exception who slipped through, which is why Heritage Foundation/JBS went full panic Tea Party mode almost immediately.

Second—attack the voting rights of poor (largely black) Americans (Shelby v. Holder; Abbott v. Perez; Husted; Rucho etc.), to ensure a populist uprising against their moneyed overlords would be thwarted. Now elected officials can choose their voters and purge those who don’t vote for them at will, while ensuring that only the candidates who bend over backwards for the donor class are funded (and not some idealistic liberal or conservative spouting on about actual policy!)

Some of these decisions were rendered after Trump was already in office and had cemented the Heritage Foundation’s majority—so what of Trump himself? Well, let’s just say he was a means to an end. A “useful idiot”. Why was his candidacy allowed to prevail in the GOP primary? Why did all his opponents bow and kiss the ring in the end? Because they knew it was all a sham.

Trump was put in power to test the limits of democracy and the court system. It was seen as inevitable that he would run afoul of the law somewhere, somehow, because he just couldn’t help himself. Whether or not he was just a self-serving narcissist or compromised foreign asset was immaterial—he was a test run to see how the 3 branches of government would respond to his errors. His donors and handlers [i.e. Bannon] didn’t really care whether he gained a second term or ended up in jail—he was ultimately expendable. He was meant to test and expose the strengths and weaknesses of the state to check him—and once exposed, those strengths could be checked and weaknesses exploited by the Heritage-stacked courts. That’s where we are today.

So with today’s decision in Trump v. United States—it isn’t Trump who won. It’s the Heritage Foundation and the donor class moving to the 3rd stage of the battle plan. After they are already assured of getting their candidates funded and elected, they now have the blueprint to absolute power. So remember, it’s not about getting Trump a second term (that’s a side benefit.) It’s all about the true authoritarian they want to install after Trump.

Edit: I primarily refer to Heritage Foundation but that includes everyone from the Federalist Society, John Birch et al up to and including their latest offshoot, the “American Accountability Foundation”. The Enemy is Legion, and hides behind many names.
For extra fun, toss in the Russia-NRA connection and election meddling.
 
Reactions: hal2kilo

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
24,840
9,083
136
The Russian meddling was a side plot but not the main plot. It may have been useful only in so far as testing the limits of hiding one’s FARA registration. Rest assured that when the GOP has control of both chambers, they will absolutely gut FARA and the use of any FISA tools to investigate FARA/campaign finance violations.
 
Reactions: Indus and hal2kilo

Indus

Lifer
May 11, 2002
10,397
7,036
136
The Russian meddling was a side plot but not the main plot. It may have been useful only in so far as testing the limits of hiding one’s FARA registration. Rest assured that when the GOP has control of both chambers, they will absolutely gut FARA and the use of any FISA tools to investigate FARA/campaign finance violations.

Now's as good a time to have a national divorce and population exchange as any!

They want to rule.. they can rule over their own kind!
 

nakedfrog

No Lifer
Apr 3, 2001
58,530
12,827
136
Now's as good a time to have a national divorce and population exchange as any!

They want to rule.. they can rule over their own kind!
Hm, yes, letting the fascists create their wonderland and thinking they'll be content with what they have, I'm sure that's just how it would work out.
 
Reactions: igor_kavinski
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |