Fayd
Diamond Member
Originally posted by: JLee
Originally posted by: Fayd
Originally posted by: JLee
Originally posted by: slayer202
No use arguing with the people who feel like the cop did no wrong. Almost humorous...
I could say the same to those who feel that the reporter did no wrong.
Unless, of course, you can prove to me that what the reporter was doing was entirely legal?
"guilty until proven innocent".
...
anyways, i think that if the officer felt that the reporter had broken any local ordinances and wanted him to leave for that (not serious enough to merit an arrest), then he would have informed him. it would have probably happened on the filmed segment. (that's a rather long segment, and even if it had been stated before, it probably would have been stated again.)
the officer was being a dick. that much is clear to me. the local news saw an accident scene, and felt the need to interview onlookers. it's not a murder investigation... this is the kind of shit local news does. i dont think they fucked up... at least not from what i can tell in the vid.
Uh...police officers don't follow the whole 'innocent until proven guilty' bit. That's for the courts. If I believed everybody was innocent, how exactly am I supposed to arrest someone?
Sure, the officer may have been a dick. So was the reporter.
i'm not talking about the police officer you dumb shit. i'm talking about you and your automatic assumption of wrongdoing on the part of the reporter.