Cops mistake water nozzle for gun...

Page 9 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

QueBert

Lifer
Jan 6, 2002
22,460
775
126
If a citizen with a CCW had been walking by and reacted exactly as the cops did, mistaking nozzle for gun...fear for his life..the whole nine yards, he would be rotting in jail right now.

One thing I am uberly impressed about with this story, the police chief actually admitted the 2 officers didn't identify themselves. Even if he only did it because they're 2 officers he dislikes, it's refreshing to see an honest chief. A good number would have covered for the officers in question and lied about how they followed procedures. Or said something to the effect of "we're currently looking into this incident and have no comment at this time" which is basically a lie to buy time.
 

FDF12389

Diamond Member
Sep 8, 2005
5,234
7
76
One thing I am uberly impressed about with this story, the police chief actually admitted the 2 officers didn't identify themselves. Even if he only did it because they're 2 officers he dislikes, it's refreshing to see an honest chief. A good number would have covered for the officers in question and lied about how they followed procedures. Or said something to the effect of "we're currently looking into this incident and have no comment at this time" which is basically a lie to buy time.

Announcing themselves would have been NOT following procedure.
 

FDF12389

Diamond Member
Sep 8, 2005
5,234
7
76
If a citizen with a CCW had been walking by and reacted exactly as the cops did, mistaking nozzle for gun...fear for his life..the whole nine yards, he would be rotting in jail right now.

Its not that cut and dry. You're comparing apples to oranges, the police had two separate reports of a man holding a gun. Furthermore, all you need is to reasonably fear for your life to use lethal force in self defense. Even a CCW is this theoretical situation would have a long court battle and could possibly go free.
 

IceBergSLiM

Lifer
Jul 11, 2000
29,933
3
81
This guy wasn't watering his lawn. If the nozzle was on the end of a hose and spraying water on his garden I'd say string the cops up by the nuts. But he was sitting on his porch with a black hose nozzle shaped like a gun, and then pointing at people with both hands as you would a gun. No sympathy.

Irrelevant. Even if he was watering the garden there was no indication the cops would have acted differently, that was my point. They were careless and reckless. For all they know the guy could have been shooting cans with a bb gun, paintball gun, airsoft gun, water gun, etc etc etc. any number of items that can be pointed at objects/people
 

IceBergSLiM

Lifer
Jul 11, 2000
29,933
3
81
Its not that cut and dry. You're comparing apples to oranges, the police had two separate reports of a man holding a gun. Furthermore, all you need is to reasonably fear for your life to use lethal force in self defense. Even a CCW is this theoretical situation would have a long court battle and could possibly go free.

And I don't think its reasonable to fear based on any asshat that calls the police. Like I mentioned above there are dozens of other legal objects that could be pointed in a fashion similar to a gun. These cops were reckless.
 

erikistired

Diamond Member
Sep 27, 2000
9,739
0
0
Irrelevant. Even if he was watering the garden there was no indication the cops would have acted differently, that was my point. They were careless and reckless. For all they know the guy could have been shooting cans with a bb gun, paintball gun, airsoft gun, water gun, etc etc etc. any number of items that can be pointed at objects/people

if he was watering his lawn he wouldn't have been sitting at the top of a balcony with a pistol looking item pointing it at things and pretending to shoot them. a little different situation.

if he was shooting a bb gun or paintball gun the people who called it in would have said so. not, he's holding a gun and waving it around.

if anything it's reckless and careless to point anything resembling a gun at people.
 

FDF12389

Diamond Member
Sep 8, 2005
5,234
7
76
And I don't think its reasonable to fear based on any asshat that calls the police. Like I mentioned above there are dozens of other legal objects that could be pointed in a fashion similar to a gun. These cops were reckless.

I was referring to the "theoretical" CCW situation. But the officers fear is definitively reasonable, by every legal definition in that state.
 

IceBergSLiM

Lifer
Jul 11, 2000
29,933
3
81
if he was watering his lawn he wouldn't have been sitting at the top of a balcony with a pistol looking item pointing it at things and pretending to shoot them. a little different situation.

if he was shooting a bb gun or paintball gun the people who called it in would have said so. not, he's holding a gun and waving it around.

if anything it's reckless and careless to point anything resembling a gun at people.



you can't be serious....it wasn't close to a fucking gun and he didn't even know they were there.
 
Last edited:

IceBergSLiM

Lifer
Jul 11, 2000
29,933
3
81
I was referring to the "theoretical" CCW situation. But the officers fear is definitively reasonable, by every legal definition in that state.

I know people have been shot for less. Holding a sandwich, reaching for their cell phone....etc.....usually in those cases THEY at least knew there was a cop there.
 

FDF12389

Diamond Member
Sep 8, 2005
5,234
7
76
I know people have been shot for less. Holding a sandwich, reaching for their cell phone....etc.....usually in those cases THEY at least knew there was a cop there.

Like I've said, its tragedy. Both parties are partially at fault. However, the officers actions were not criminal, they followed SOP. That's all I'm saying. Everyone here says they should have announced themselves, that's incorrect.
 

FDF12389

Diamond Member
Sep 8, 2005
5,234
7
76
Police get away with all kinds of BS, it wouldn't surprise me if they walk free..

They will, they should. What would you have them charged with if it were up to you?

And what type of military, law enforcement, security, etc. Experience do you have?
 

IceBergSLiM

Lifer
Jul 11, 2000
29,933
3
81
Like I've said, its tragedy. Both parties are partially at fault. However, the officers actions were not criminal, they followed SOP. That's all I'm saying. Everyone here says they should have announced themselves, that's incorrect.

Well they should have done a more thorough investigation OR told him to put down the "weapon" . One of the other should have been done. There are simply way to many legal objects that can be misconstrued as weapons. Pointing things shouldn't be a capital offense.
 

FDF12389

Diamond Member
Sep 8, 2005
5,234
7
76
Well they should have done a more thorough investigation OR told him to put down the "weapon" . One of the other should have been done. There are simply way to many legal objects that can be misconstrued as weapons. Pointing things shouldn't be a capital offense.

If you change procedures more cops will die. It won't happen. Do tradegies occur with the current system? Yes. But changing them will be far more detrimental.

Let me know if you know what a bullet flying through the air sounds like going by your head. Let me know if someone close to you has been shot on the job. Let me know if you have been held at gunpoint, twice. How about having someone shot and killed in front of you?

I'm not trying to be condescending, and I'm sure some here have been through worse, but a few of you in this thread calling for the police to be arrested just have no idea what a situation like this does to someone. Hindsight is 20/20. These officers were trying to do the best job they could, and they made a really fucking easy mistake. A mistake that just about everyone could have, and probably would have made, while in the line of duty.
 

IceBergSLiM

Lifer
Jul 11, 2000
29,933
3
81
If you change procedures more cops will die. It won't happen. Do tradegies occur with the current system? Yes. But changing them will be far more detrimental.

Let me know if you know what a bullet flying through the air sounds like going by your head. Let me know if someone close to you has been shot on the job. Let me know if you have been held at gunpoint, twice. How about having someone shot and killed in front of you?

I'm not trying to be condescending, and I'm sure some here have been through worse, but a few of you in this thread calling for the police to be arrested just have no idea what a situation like this does to someone. Hindsight is 20/20. These officers were trying to do the best job they could, and they made a really fucking easy mistake. A mistake that just about everyone could have, and probably would have made, while in the line of duty.

I didn't say they should be arrested. I said they were careless and reckless and I stick by that.
 

MrX8503

Diamond Member
Oct 23, 2005
4,529
0
0
Police chief said outright cops never ID'ed themselves.



And yes, I think if the police said POLICE, DROP YOUR WEAPONS AND RAISE YOUR HANDS the guy would've done so instead of fucking around like drunk people do.

You're assuming that they could identify themselves before the guy raised his garden nozzle. Your theory goes like this...

Well if they did this and this, it could of happened like this and so and so would happen.

Assumptions don't keep cops alive. Like I said you weren't at the scene, you don't know specifics of what happened. What if the guy raised the nozzle before police could identify themselves? There are too many things that could of happened for you to make those kinds of assumptions.

When a suspect appears to be shooting at police, all bets are off and you will be shot. There's nothing that will change this because it would endanger the life of a police officer.
 
Last edited:

AyashiKaibutsu

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2004
9,306
3
81
More than likely, they could have handled it better, but I'll give these guys more of a break than the cops that kill a nonthreatening person with a taser. Atleast they legitamately were worried about their own lives. However, it's not like the guy quick drew it on them; he had it in hand and they couldn't tell it wasn't a gun? Somewhat negligent.
 

SarcasticDwarf

Diamond Member
Jun 8, 2001
9,574
1
76
If you change procedures more cops will die. It won't happen. Do tradegies occur with the current system? Yes. But changing them will be far more detrimental.

So which is preferable for society, more cops dying or more innocent people dying?
 

Alone

Diamond Member
Nov 19, 2006
7,492
0
0
Can someone please tell me why the police officers were even close enough to be in any danger? They were told in advance that the suspect may have had a weapon.

How hard would it be to stand back out of range and identify yourself?

I don't know if you guys watch too many movies, but pistols don't exactly have a lot of range, especially a sixshooter being fired from a drunk.
 

IceBergSLiM

Lifer
Jul 11, 2000
29,933
3
81
Can someone please tell me why the police officers were even close enough to be in any danger? They were told in advance that the suspect may have had a weapon.

How hard would it be to stand back out of range and identify yourself?

I don't know if you guys watch too many movies, but pistols don't exactly have a lot of range, especially a sixshooter being fired from a drunk.

someone said they followed SOP. It doesn't make sense to me that getting close to someone who has or may have a weapon is SOP but I'm not a cop.
 

FDF12389

Diamond Member
Sep 8, 2005
5,234
7
76
Can someone please tell me why the police officers were even close enough to be in any danger? They were told in advance that the suspect may have had a weapon.

How hard would it be to stand back out of range and identify yourself?

I don't know if you guys watch too many movies, but pistols don't exactly have a lot of range, especially a sixshooter being fired from a drunk.

So a intoxicated persons bullets don't go as far as a sober persons bullets? Even the range on a .22 is pretty friggen far. And this is a apartment building, if they Identified themselves and he retreated into a building the situation gets much worse.

You obviously don't know a damn thing about law enforcement procedures.
 

Alone

Diamond Member
Nov 19, 2006
7,492
0
0
Range is the same, accuracy is not. Way to be completely ignorant.

Aso, it's part of their job requirement to identify themselves.
 

MrX8503

Diamond Member
Oct 23, 2005
4,529
0
0
So which is preferable for society, more cops dying or more innocent people dying?

Its preferable to not have cops killed by criminals.

You're under the assumption that every shootout involves only innocent people. This case involves an innocent person, other cases may or may not.
 

FDF12389

Diamond Member
Sep 8, 2005
5,234
7
76
Range is the same, accuracy is not. Way to be completely ignorant.

I'm ignorant? You assume the cops were psychic and knew he was drunk in your first post, then say pistols don't have a long range. Even the lightest handgun rounds kill for miles. You worded your post wrong, and even with your correct wording you are still completely wrong.

Aso, it's part of their job requirement to identify themselves.

No its not. Again, your ignorance is showing. You obviously don't know a damn thing about the matter if you think cops are required to identify themselves in all situations.

And again you fucked up your wording. For it to be a job requirement they would have to identify themselves as officers to get the job, but if they didn't have the job yet they would be impersonating a law enforcement officer. If you're gonna knee jerk at least start using the right words.
 

CVSiN

Diamond Member
Jul 19, 2004
9,301
0
0
Irrelevant. Even if he was watering the garden there was no indication the cops would have acted differently, that was my point. They were careless and reckless. For all they know the guy could have been shooting cans with a bb gun, paintball gun, airsoft gun, water gun, etc etc etc. any number of items that can be pointed at objects/people

and ANY of those items would still get you shot by ANY Police Officer in ANY State/City.
They are trained to react.

Sorry but those of you that have never been a cop or have served in the Military in any action with similar rules of engagement haven't a leg to stand on here..

he points an "gun" shaped object at a police officer they don't have to do anything but react.
he will be shot.. and the officers will be placed back on active duty after the mandatory leave/cool down period.

Having been Assigned to a base security detachment working with MA's in the Navy for a tour (Navy version of a police officer) I woulda done the exact same thing.. me and my partners life comes first.
we get someone pointing something that looks like a firearm.. we are going to drop him and drop him hard.
that's training and what we are expected to do.
Asked my current roommate who is an active duty HPD officer about this and he said the exact same thing.
In that case he and his partner would have shot first as well.

Tragic yes.. wrong no..
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |