... it's no where near as altruistic as you make it sound......more like they didn't want to fall in OCZ's hole.
I feel compelled to offer my two cents.
First, I like and use Corsair's products. Their support and behavior has been excellent. Their active presence this and other forums by the colored beards is refreshingly candid. Everything I can see, without a single exception, indicates Corsair has their corporate cultural act together. However, regardless of the organization, I think it would be very naive to judge anyones performance in the immediate wake of the OCZ gaff. I am sure OCZ also would be waxing towards painful honesty right now if another vendor happened to be first with a marketable product and made the same mistake. This is not a fair time to judge anyone. Welcome to the defective human race and open market competition.
Second, after a considerable amount of thought, I am sticking with Intel. It is my opinion, when I upgrade my excellent 80 GB G2 to a 120 Gb drive in the near future, Intel is most likely to provide the highest probablity of a safe balance between performance, reliability, and longevity at a somewhat competitive price. I am tempted to buy a 120 GB G2 now because I tend to think 34 nm is better technology at this time. However, I really do not need the extra space right now and would rather not spend $230 based just on fear of a new technology.