Aww, poor Darwin a little butt hurt and can't take a shred of criticism but loves to dish it out. Good thing science isn't as sensitive as you are.
Of course, "evolutionist" is used in the same manner "creationist" is used...and that's pejoratively.
So what? No ones exempt from criticism...not even evolutionists, unless you think that your position is indeed infallible.
Not at all my friend, I honestly didn't know that there was a need for such a word. I am proud to be an evolutionist, a mathist, an algebraist, and every other "ist" you want to throw behind very well established scientific principles that we know.
I
enjoy true scientific criticism, as that is the way science works. I
enjoy being "wrong" about science because for everything I learn that I was wrong about I have actually gained more knowledge. Point in case, I was not upset when I learned that the expansion of the universe was speeding up and not as I was previously taught that it was (and per our understanding
SHOULD BE slowing down). It is truly intriguing to me as it creates far more questions than it answers, I enjoy that.
My so called "beliefs" are "challengeable" and I invite that as long as it is at least intelligent. My so called "beliefs" can and will change, as illustrated above, as new discoveries are made and I learn. Hell my belief, or lack thereof, in god can easily be changed and is no way set in stone. I simply require actual evidence and not some blind faith that is better explained by other hypothesis (especially concerning the particular god a person believes in).
So please, pretty please, challenge away just keep it civil and intelligent.