- Feb 22, 2007
- 16,240
- 7
- 76
Lots of seniors are a bit upset over social security and the changes of late. I know my parents did not get any increase this year because they say that cost of living did not increase. I beg to differ, their rent, utilities, food, all went up. I read an article on social security and how it consist of basically money that is not there.
http://dissidentvoice.org/2010/01/economic-hoodwinking-of-the-public/
I didn't get too concerned over the idea that they could make it null&void until I started reading this:
http://www.ourfuture.org/budgetcommission
Don't these people already have too much power to change the economy ?Why don't we just forget about voting for someone, put a king in the white house and forget about people. It seems that is where we are headed. I really don't know if Washington has just become plain evil or if it is just lack of concern for anyone but themselves. Or maybe a little of both.
http://dissidentvoice.org/2010/01/economic-hoodwinking-of-the-public/
Kim Petersen: You write that the Treasury has stolen money from social security for current operating expenses and replaced it with worthless IOUs? But how worthless are the IOUs? Even if the IOUs have no open-market value, could the government default on its own IOUs without causing currency flight?
Allen W. Smith: The IOUs in the trust fund are completely different from any other government certificates. They are not real bonds in any meaningful sense of the term. They are a gimmick, created by the government in an effort to fool the public into believing that Social Security funds are invested in Treasury bonds, when, in fact, they have not been invested in anything. Money can be saved and invested, but it is not possible to both spend and invest money. Once the money is spent, there is nothing left to invest. Every dollar of the $2.5 trillion that is supposed to be in the trust fund has been spent to fund tax cuts, wars, and other government programs. Since none of the surplus Social Security revenue has been saved, none of it has been invested in anything.
What gives the special-issue IOUs the allusion of being real is that printed on the face of each of these documents are the words, Backed by the full faith and credit of the United States Government. The problem is that no provisions have been made for repayment of any of the Social Security funds. Given the deceptive practices that the government has already engaged in with regard to Social Security, it is hard to have faith that the government will repay the funds, and given the fact that some foreign lenders are already expressing concern about lending additional funds to the U.S., the credit of the United States government is not nearly as strong as it once was.
Most of the public debt is in the form of public issue marketable Treasury bonds that can be bought and sold in the open market at will. These bonds are as good as gold, so investors who hold such bonds have nothing to worry about. The government could never default on any of these marketable bonds without creating panic in the financial markets and causing currency to be withdrawn by foreign investors. Therefore, we can be absolutely sure that the government will never default on any of its public issue marketable Treasury bonds.
The special issue IOUs in the trust fund are a different matter. The government could declare the Social Security debt null and void at any time. Foreign investors might frown on such action, but, since it would not directly affect them, I think they would just view it as a domestic issue between the U.S. government and its citizens. Obviously such an act would be politically unpopular with the American people. But would it be any more unpopular than massive increases in taxes in order to repay the Social Security money? That is exactly what it boils down to. It will take enormous tax increases in the future in order to raise enough money to repay the $2.5 trillion of surplus Social Security revenue that the government has looted over the last 25 years. Unless the American people, and the Congress, support such tax hikes, the government will have no choice but to default on its debt to Social Security.
I didn't get too concerned over the idea that they could make it null&void until I started reading this:
http://www.ourfuture.org/budgetcommission
We write with strong opposition to the proposal of Senators Kent Conrad, Judd Gregg and others to create a deficit-reduction commission that would override the normal legislative process and replace it with expedited procedures prohibiting amendments and limiting debate. We write with an increasing sense of urgency, because plans to vote on the Conrad-Gregg proposal on January 20th or soon thereafter, as part of the debt ceiling bill. If the Conrad-Gregg proposal were to become law, it could dramatically change by stealth critical benefits and services so vital to Americas families.
Those supporting this circumvention of the normal process have stated openly the desire to avoid political accountability. Americans-seniors, women, working families, people with disabilities, youth, young adults, children, people of color, veterans, communities of faith and others-expect their elected representatives to be responsible and accountable for shaping such significant, far-reaching legislation.
Don't these people already have too much power to change the economy ?Why don't we just forget about voting for someone, put a king in the white house and forget about people. It seems that is where we are headed. I really don't know if Washington has just become plain evil or if it is just lack of concern for anyone but themselves. Or maybe a little of both.