Country music star has change of heart on 2nd amendment after Las Vegas massacre

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

woolfe9998

Lifer
Apr 8, 2013
16,189
14,102
136
America is done. There is no solution. The things you can do in America without running the risk of being shot or blown up is at an all time low. Everything is fucked, they're almost running out of distractions. I do understand his feelings though.

I haven't the foggiest idea where you're getting any of this from.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=95379&page=1

This is what happens when we obsess over news stories. Mass murders are high profile events for the media. We've had a surge of them over these past several years, yet the overall murder rate continues to decline.
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,723
2,064
136
I haven't the foggiest idea where you're getting any of this from.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=95379&page=1

This is what happens when we obsess over news stories. Mass murders are high profile events for the media. We've had a surge of them over these past several years, yet the overall murder rate continues to decline.

Thanks for the link.


"Fox and Blumstein found math problems and mistakes in the FBI report."
........................
"
Fox pointed out “a horribly misleading example of rounding” in the FBI’s statement that firearms rose from accounting for 6 of 10 murders to 7 of 10 — which seems like a 16.6 percent increase. The unrounded rise was from 6.48 to 6.52 — “a statistically insignificant 0.4 percent increase,” Fox said.

The FBI’s Carlos Davis agreed: “The rounding is deceptive. We should not have made that comparison.”
 

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,234
701
126
Do you want to ban alcohol? Or do you accept that some kids will die so people can have a drink?

Yes, as far as I'm concerned. My dead brother says yes from his grave. If we can't ban it, there should be absolutely no going easy. Jail time for the 1st time (dui), period. If you kill someone, murder, period.
 

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
37,852
8,314
136
Can anyone point to any poster here or in the other thread that have called for a ban on guns? No? Then its odd that the counter arguments against gun control are against something no one is proposing.

Fucking dumbass gun nutters.
Ahem. I have called not just for a ban on automatic weapons, but for all guns. My position, and I stated it in this very thread yesterday (Post #21):

1. Nobody, you, me, the president, I don't care who you are... nobody should be allowed to own a gun. Every gun in the USA should be the property of the US government.

2. Only trained, vetted, continuously monitored personnel should be allowed to touch one of these guns. That would be a certain subset of law enforcement or military.

3. If you want to hunt with a gun, you too cannot own a gun. You should have to apply for a license to hunt with guns, be trained, vetted, continuously monitored and when you want to go hunting you should (in advance) schedule a hunting event and only then, after approval, check out any guns involved. You should need to have at least one other licensed hunter in your company for that event. You should have a plan, itinerary and stick to that plan. You should not be allowed to drink alcohol during one of these events.
 
Last edited:

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
37,852
8,314
136
Yes, as far as I'm concerned. My dead brother says yes from his grave. If we can't ban it, there should be absolutely no going easy. Jail time for the 1st time (dui), period. If you kill someone, murder, period.
I can totally see that. If you don't make a first time offense heavily punished you do not send the right message. You have to put an onus on it not just a slap on the wrist for the first offense, but make it something that people fear doing enough where they'll refrain from it in the first place.
 

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
38,003
18,350
146
Just like guns, as a society we consider alcohol related deaths acceptable losses.
 

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
37,852
8,314
136
Just like guns, as a society we consider alcohol related deaths acceptable losses.
Speak for yourself. Speaking for myself, no gun or alcohol caused loss is acceptable. I also take issue with your concept of "society." Society is just out to fuck you up. Bob Dylan said that many years ago. It's the truth. Wise up.
 

frowertr

Golden Member
Apr 17, 2010
1,371
41
91
I own half a dozen AR15 rifles, one is a class III licensed short barrel. Also have a few supressors and a slide fire stock. Love my toys, but just like other dangerous things, in the hands of a madman, its an arsenal.

Gun can control talk will quiet down in a couple weeks when the next disaster strikes.
 

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
37,852
8,314
136
I own half a dozen AR15 rifles, one is a class III licensed short barrel. Also have a few supressors and ..
Gun can control talk will quiet down in a couple weeks when the next disaster strikes.

Columbine was at the zenith when it happened. It was the worst mass shooting of its kind. But these mass shootings in the USA are kind of a oneupsmanship thing, even Columbine, which had just raised the ante.

The ante has been raised again as of Sunday and it's gotten to be a very high stakes game. The man fired from the 32nd floor of a building overlooking a concert with 22,000 people packed shoulder to shoulder. His high powered bullets killed or injured approximately 3% of that crowd. It will be hard for someone to top that, but human ingenuity being what it is, I'm sure that someone will find a way. I'm in favor of those AR15's being taken away from you if you do not voluntarily surrender them. Nobody should own killing machines and for me that goes right down to the derringer and everything between.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,821
29,574
146
he was, they found them at his home

ah. so they did do something when they found his arsenal? oh right, they didn't. He had already murdered dozens of people. Would they have been able to do anything before, just because he had tons of legal guns? No, no they couldn't have.

Hell, I was listening to a gun dealer that sold this guy several guns over the last year, and everyone in the store said that there was nothing off about the guy, nothing that raised an eyebrow, he was completely clear. And his "arsenal?" lol--the dude only had what, 19 guns? Gun collectors and enthusiasts have dozens, even hundreds of guns. This guy was barely a fart when it comes to arming himself compared to many card-carrying NRA bedwetters.

So yeah, let's continue to focus on "mental health" despite the dozens and dozens of case studies and actual, real life examples, that prove to us again and again and again that there is no way to address this issue and actually stop crazy people from doing this when, by and large, they generally seem to check out.
 

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
38,003
18,350
146
Speak for yourself. Speaking for myself, no gun or alcohol caused loss is acceptable. I also take issue with your concept of "society." Society is just out to fuck you up. Bob Dylan said that many years ago. It's the truth. Wise up.
Just watch what happens with the situations. We accept it.
 

frowertr

Golden Member
Apr 17, 2010
1,371
41
91
I'm in favor of those AR15's being taken away from you if you do not voluntarily surrender them. Nobody should own killing machines and for me that goes right down to the derringer and everything between.

Good luck with that one. I sure all the people that own guns illegally with happily turn them over in the utopia you have created in your head.
 

pmv

Lifer
May 30, 2008
13,298
8,212
136
I haven't the foggiest idea where you're getting any of this from.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=95379&page=1

This is what happens when we obsess over news stories. Mass murders are high profile events for the media. We've had a surge of them over these past several years, yet the overall murder rate continues to decline.


The nation’s longest and steepest rise in crime totals — increases of 10.2 percent to 13.8 percent from 1965 through 1969 — came as postwar baby boomers reached the crime-prone ages of 15 to 25 and may finally be undone by current trends, Blumstein said.

Academic experts credited both parties’ favorite anti-crime remedies but also factors beyond control of politicians, like the aging of baby boomers past crime-prone years.

Hang on - so they are saying that the fall in the crime rate is happening because baby-boomers have gotten too old and decrepit to cause as much mayhem as they used to?

Maybe this needs to be reposted in that baby-boomer-bashing thread?

(I don't endorse such collective blame, I've even objected to it, yet, dammit, it's hard to resist stirring the pot).
 

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
14,659
12,782
146
Hang on - so they are saying that the fall in the crime rate is happening because baby-boomers have gotten too old and decrepit to cause as much mayhem as they used to?

Maybe this needs to be reposted in that baby-boomer-bashing thread?

(I don't endorse such collective blame, I've even objected to it, yet, dammit, it's hard to resist stirring the pot).
It almost looks like, by multiplying the total number of people in an age range that's prone to violent behavior, all things being equal, you multiply the amount of violent behavior by a roughly equivalent amount. Surprising.
 

evident

Lifer
Apr 5, 2005
11,938
538
126
I used to be an optimist. The optimist in me has been slowly but surely bludgeoned to death. I am now a cynic and a pessimist. The 2016 presidential election and the continuing terror have done me in. Now this. It just drives a nail into the heart of the optimist in me, whose heartbeat is so faint I'm not sure it's alive.

However, I disagree with the second sentence I quoted here, "there is no solution." Concerning these mass shootings, I have a solution and I've been stating it for a number of years. I used to get shot down, just mauled for expressing it, but nowadays I think my ideas are taking root in the populace, in some quarters.

You should not be allowed to own a gun. All guns should be government property. You should not be allowed to get your hands on one unless you are:

Vetted, trained and monitored law enforcement or military.

If you are a hunter, you should only be able to check out guns. When doing so, you should have a permit, an itinerary and be buddied by at least one other vetted, trained and monitored hunter.

The NRA is your enemy, whether you know it or not.

Sounds great on paper. Now how do you implement this in this country and forcibly take guns away from current owners...

I've been (thankfully) living away from the US all this year in a country with virtually no guns. Want to talk about freedom? the ability of being able to walk virtually anywhere in a huge city, even stumbling home at 2AM without having to worry about getting fucking shot or mugged. or being in the middle of a huge crowd without worrying about getting gunned down or blown up. oh and lets throw the ability to go to the hospital or get medical care without having to spend the equivalent of downpayment on a vehicle. The US is F'd right now.
 
Last edited:

woolfe9998

Lifer
Apr 8, 2013
16,189
14,102
136
Hang on - so they are saying that the fall in the crime rate is happening because baby-boomers have gotten too old and decrepit to cause as much mayhem as they used to?

Maybe this needs to be reposted in that baby-boomer-bashing thread?

(I don't endorse such collective blame, I've even objected to it, yet, dammit, it's hard to resist stirring the pot).

My apologies but I didn't realize my article seems to have been from the year 1999, which makes it out of date. The decline continued through 2014 at least:

https://www.infoplease.com/us/crime/homicide-rate-1950-2014

I think there was a spike up in 2016 if memory serves from reading it elsewhere. Not sure why it spiked up just last year.

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-u-s-murder-rate-is-up-but-still-far-below-its-1980-peak/

I think last year might have been a fluke. Other violent crimes also went up but to a much lesser extent than murder, and property crimes actually went down.

I don't believe the baby boomer explanation was more than a small factor, at least not as of 1999. The decline started in the early 90's. The boomers will still quite young enough to commit plenty of crime then. It may actually be more of a factor now.
 

SlowSpyder

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
17,305
1,001
126
Yes, as far as I'm concerned. My dead brother says yes from his grave. If we can't ban it, there should be absolutely no going easy. Jail time for the 1st time (dui), period. If you kill someone, murder, period.

I'm sorry to hear of your family's loss. I'm sure losing a loved one in such a way isn't easy.

As you can attest, when a freedom is used irresponsibly it can cause harm. It sounds like you are for harsher penalties, I'm for that too. But, do you think the answer is to remove the freedom?
 

SlowSpyder

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
17,305
1,001
126
lol, wrong person to ask, 24 years sober here. And while a somewhat clever attempt to divert, I'm staying on course. You're good with children being killed by guns to ensure your right to own one isn't infringed.
You've made that exquisitely clear.

You are twisting things. Most freedoms we have will cause harm if used for evil or irresponsibly. Kids will die if someone drunk drives. Kids will die if someone uses a gun for evil intent or carelessly. Kids will die because we allow free speech which can lead to bullying and suicides. Kids will die because tobacco exists and is sold everywhere. Kids will die because we have automobiles. You are holding guns to a standard you don't hold anything else to.

Am I ok with kids dying for my freedom? No. Do I accept that it'll happen for freedoms? Yes. When you hold all these other things to the same standard you hold guns to, we can have a discussion. Until then you are fighting an emotional battle in a war of logic.
 

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,234
701
126
I'm sorry to hear of your family's loss. I'm sure losing a loved one in such a way isn't easy.

As you can attest, when a freedom is used irresponsibly it can cause harm. It sounds like you are for harsher penalties, I'm for that too. But, do you think the answer is to remove the freedom?

Yes, I do and no amount of discussion on the subject will change my mind so don't waste electrons typing them on the particular subject.
 
Feb 16, 2005
14,035
5,338
136
You are twisting things. Most freedoms we have will cause harm if used for evil or irresponsibly. Kids will die if someone drunk drives. Kids will die if someone uses a gun for evil intent or carelessly. Kids will die because we allow free speech which can lead to bullying and suicides. Kids will die because tobacco exists and is sold everywhere. Kids will die because we have automobiles. You are holding guns to a standard you don't hold anything else to.

Am I ok with kids dying for my freedom? No. Do I accept that it'll happen for freedoms? Yes. When you hold all these other things to the same standard you hold guns to, we can have a discussion. Until then you are fighting an emotional battle in a war of logic.

No, I'm looking for rational discourse on the epidemic of gun violence. The gun is designed to kill, that's it. That's it's sole purpose.
Cars - transportation to work, vacation, grocery store, etc
Alcohol - in moderation can help relieve stress and relax you
Ban the fuck out of tobacco, I have zero issues with that.
Guns need to be regulated, at some level, I don't know what that is, but we've done nothing to control the stem of gun violence and it's worked for shit. Your strawman arguments mean nothing, we're talking about guns. That's it, that's the alpha and omega of this discussion, the guy wasn't throwing liquor bottles at people on the ground, the killer in Sandy Hook didn't trap the students in a room and 2nd hand smoke them to death.
There will never be a rational discussion on this. You find the deaths of children an acceptable loss to keep your freedoms. I do not.
 

SlowSpyder

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
17,305
1,001
126
No, I'm looking for rational discourse on the epidemic of gun violence. The gun is designed to kill, that's it. That's it's sole purpose.
Cars - transportation to work, vacation, grocery store, etc
Alcohol - in moderation can help relieve stress and relax you
Ban the fuck out of tobacco, I have zero issues with that.
Guns need to be regulated, at some level, I don't know what that is, but we've done nothing to control the stem of gun violence and it's worked for shit. Your strawman arguments mean nothing, we're talking about guns. That's it, that's the alpha and omega of this discussion, the guy wasn't throwing liquor bottles at people on the ground, the killer in Sandy Hook didn't trap the students in a room and 2nd hand smoke them to death.
There will never be a rational discussion on this. You find the deaths of children an acceptable loss to keep your freedoms. I do not.

If you do not feel people will die from freedoms then I don't know what to tell you. You are holding guns to a different standard. Guns, in moderation can help relieve stress and relax you. See how I bypassed the damage guns do as you did with alcohol while not addressing what I asked at all? If you are willing to trade your freedoms to save lives, then I expect to see your posts from now on to have a tone of banning free speech, alcohol, tobacco, guns, and cars.

The items in bold above are not guns and each of them has lead to dead children. Are you willing to let kids die to continue to have these rights and freedoms? Y/N
 
Feb 16, 2005
14,035
5,338
136
If you do not feel people will die from freedoms then I don't know what to tell you. You are holding guns to a different standard. Guns, in moderation can help relieve stress and relax you. See how I bypassed the damage guns do as you did with alcohol while not addressing what I asked at all? If you are willing to trade your freedoms to save lives, then I expect to see your posts from now on to have a tone of banning free speech, alcohol, tobacco, guns, and cars.

The items in bold above are not guns and each of them has lead to dead children. Are you willing to let kids die to continue to have these rights and freedoms? Y/N
wish in one hand and shit in the other see which fills up first.
 
Feb 16, 2005
14,035
5,338
136
If you do not feel people will die from freedoms then I don't know what to tell you. You are holding guns to a different standard. Guns, in moderation can help relieve stress and relax you. See how I bypassed the damage guns do as you did with alcohol while not addressing what I asked at all? If you are willing to trade your freedoms to save lives, then I expect to see your posts from now on to have a tone of banning free speech, alcohol, tobacco, guns, and cars.

The items in bold above are not guns and each of them has lead to dead children. Are you willing to let kids die to continue to have these rights and freedoms? Y/N
and this is about guns, that's it, no matter how many other strawmen you prop up in front of it. Your pathetic attempts are tiresome and boring and completely unsurprising.
How about universal background checks and you have to register each and every gun you own? You can keep all your precious toys but need to be responsible for their whereabouts. We've tried nothing for decades now, and it's only getting worse, time to try something.
 

SlowSpyder

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
17,305
1,001
126
wish in one hand and shit in the other see which fills up first.

Can I get that Y/N? Are you alright with and/or willing to accept kids will die so you can have those freedoms?

I hope you see why such wordplay is silliness, including when you do the same with guns.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |