Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: Howard
Brings up an interesting philosophical argument. Is it better to respect the client's privacy, or to go LoKe on the child porn in order to [potentially] save children from harm?
The client has no privacy. If they're paying me to sift through their HD and clean all the crap off of the HD, they better not have anything on their that would jeopardize my operations or me operating within the confines of the law.
The ethical question would be whether or not to report the child porn, because in order to know it was child porn, you'd have to have looked at it. In the eyes' of the law, that makes you just as guilty as the perp. Which is why you're supposed to call the authorities if you assume there is child porn on the computer.