Covidiots thread

Page 155 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
24,247
10,899
136
Without arguing the details, I for one am totally open to doing ANYTHING that helps keep me and my family safe. It may not be perfect, but to do nothing is asinine. I am not saying you are arguing against it, but this sort of black and white thinking is what keeps people form doing anything.

Masks aren't perfect-don't wear masks at all.
Vaccine isn't perfect - don't get vaccinated.
Omicron is not totally stopped even with a booster - don't get a booster.

Without masks and vaccines, things would be infinitely worse, yet there are millions of people who would do nothing because it doesn'1t fix everything perfectly. Conservative brains are broken.
They have a real problem understanding proportion, and risk analysis. They've always been overly aware of crime.

Love responding to something old. Cookies where are you. Edge is about to go out the door.
 

eikelbijter

Senior member
Aug 27, 2009
534
304
136
It's not weird at all. Only your fixation on it is.

Exactly why would I want to avoid a vaccine if I had been infected?

If I had been infected, I would only be happy to get the extra protection that a vaccine offers. Especially given the mutating nature of COVID and the breakthrough infections.

Natural Immunity is another common talking point for Antivaxxers, but it doesn't hold any water as an excuse to not get vaccinated.

Likewise your appeal to save money by vaccinating less, seems utterly absurd given the prices of vaccine vs the cost of even one hospitalization.

Your shtick is quite tiresome. You claim to be super well informed, then repeat absurd antivaxx talking points.

I'm not saying anyone should "avoid" vaccination. Why do you guys keep putting words in my mouth? It really shows you guys are not thinking clearly.

Well, the Dutch government for one disagrees with you. You have SO much PTSD from the Antivaxxers that you're unwilling to open your mind to the rest of the world. Listen man, natural immunity is real, and the more I learn about it, the more I realize it's robust, and as far as protection against severe disease goes, long lasting, even with the new variants that we KNOW of. It CERTAINLY "holds water".

According to data from Canada, protection from infection from a vaccination more than a few months ago, looks to have dropped below 15%. Now of course a serious drop in that protection is to be expected from natural immunity too.


Booster protection seems to measurably wane after 10 weeks: "Among people who received two doses of the AstraZeneca vaccine, a booster with one of the mRNA vaccines, made by Pfizer and Moderna, was 60 percent effective at preventing symptomatic disease two to four weeks after the shot. After 10 weeks, however, the Pfizer booster was just 35 percent effective. "

Now, look at that ICU or Hospital line. The protection against severe disease is EXCELLENT, almost 100%. There is no good reason to try to FORCE others to get boosted, NONE, especially with a vaccine that was made to match the wild strain, because the sterilizing protection you'd get from that is good for a very short time. I'm telling you now, folks are NOT going to get a booster every three months, there is just now way. If THAT's the only way you'd be satisfied, if everybody just shut up and take whatever the powers that be say we should, prepare for a very unhappy rest of your life my friend.

To compare the price of 1 shot to 1 admission is preposterous. Fact is, we now have more than 15 thousand fully vaccinated Americans who have died already and probably around 5 MILLION breakthrough infections.

Again, I AM fully vaccinated, I believe and defend science and modern medicine, but we HAVE to be honest when something doesn't work as well as we'd hoped it would, and these vaccines fall into that category for me. As I watch more and more lectures (MIT has amazing stuff out there!), I realize that we probably knew, or expected, that these vaccines would only work in a sterilizing manner for less than a year. It's just the nature of Corona viruses in general, they mutate very fast, so the neutralizing Abs necessary to prevent entrance into a cell through that ACE2 receptor, which in effect can kill the virus too much replication starts, don't match well enough anymore. Once the virus is in the cell, those Abs can't even get to it anymore, and your immune system's next job becomes to destroy the cell.

I'm ALL FOR people getting however many boosters they want, seriously. The WHO by the way says to NOT boost healthy people; are THEY anti-vaxxers? Are THEY a fringe group? Would you call them names?

You keep calling my claims "absurd", but they are clearly not. You might not agree with them, but they are far from fringe opinions. My only problem is with MANDATING that everybody get a shot that should be optional, just like the flu vaccine is. That's it! You HAVE to stop claiming I'm anti-vax because your refusal to see grey in your black-and-white world, is contributing to INCREASING the division in a country that's primed for civil war. I've been living here for damn near 30 years and I've seen the slide. Neighbors that can't even talk to each other anymore without resorting to insults within seconds, with BOTH sides doing nothing but repeating talking points. A complete unwillingness to put yourself into someone else's shoes. A level of irrationality I never expected to encounter in my LIFE, and I'm surround by musicians most of the time! LOL
 
Last edited:

eikelbijter

Senior member
Aug 27, 2009
534
304
136
You’re spreading more anti-vax misinformation.

1) vaccinating kids is important for their health as well as the health of others.

2) having just been to LA the idea that 50% of people outdoors are wearing masks is laughable. This is either a super edge case or you’re lying.
1) The goverment of the UK seems to agree with me. Are THEY anti-vaxxers?

2) I didn't say LA, I said on MY WALK. You don't even know where I live exactly and I promise you, the level of irrational fear differs GREATLY by neighborhood. Again with the incredibly dumb insinuation that I would be lying.....
 

gothuevos

Platinum Member
Jul 28, 2010
2,313
1,854
136
Here's my 2 cents on the whole matter, now almost 2 years into it.

The right has yet again successfully poisoned the well as far as any mitigation efforts go. And to be honest, I don't know if there is any strong appetite for any strong measures, anyway - regardless of what a tiny sliver of majorities in polls show (or at least, used to). And we're seeing this in other countries too, not just the US.

The GOP is already all but assured to take the house, maybe the Dems have an outside shot at keeping and/or slightly expanding their Senate majority but unlikely. And once again the Dems are losing the messaging battle, BIG time (think CRT, but worse). They now risk making this a losing political issue and head into 2022/2024 and suffer even bigger losses than predicted. I hate to use the term damage control, but if we want to avoid GOP super majorities, that's exactly what it is. Mind you, I'm not saying this because the GOP is going to run on some sort of wildly popular or useful agenda, but their messaging machine is great at the last minute.

None of these are necessarily my original ideas, but what I would focus on moving forward:

1). Continue to work on, refine and promote vaccines. Mandates where they make sense (healthcare, travel industry, military, etc). Try to turn this into the seasonal flu shot in the near future.

2). Continue to also focus on therapeutics - go "Operation Warp Speed" on this and try to release something akin to Tamiflu. OTC even? Not sure where Pfizer and Merck are with this. Maybe a pipe dream but at least something that your family doc can easily and readily prescribe. Even if it's not a silver bullet but decreases symptom severity/duration (like Tamiflu) and keeps you out of the hospital, it would be huge. This could be Biden's legacy, too.

3). Agree with more at-home tests, cheaper, more available (yes I know this has been mentioned and is being worked on).

The above 3 alone would GREATLY decrease the heavy burden on our strained healthcare system.

4). Spend money to improve surge capacity at our busiest hospitals. I don't know if this means expanding ICU wings, ER capacity, entirely new buildings for overflow altogether (not to mention the additional staffing it would require). It would probably be very costly and wouldn't happen overnight, but this step must be taken as there will continue to be future variants especially as vaccination holdouts continue. It's a self-fulfilling prophecy at this point. But we can't continue to have our healthcare system go through the ringer every time there's a surge.

5). Do WHATEVER IT TAKES to help with healthcare worker burnout, fatigue, and threats. Make it a federal crime to threaten a healthcare worker. Offer FULL student loan repayment for those physicians that have been mired in this muck the longest (I think some states have done this, or something similar?). Whatever incentives/protections it takes.


Just my thoughts, happy to hear any feedback.
 

eelw

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 1999
9,805
4,994
136
My only problem is with MANDATING that everybody get a shot that should be optional, just like the flu vaccine is. That's it!
It’s the hypocrisy that we on the left hate that is coming from the extreme right. So accept their right to choose if they mask or vaccinate. But yet they can control what complete strangers do with an unwanted pregnancy? Respect their right to shop without a mask. But then they complain when a private business limits who can enter. Why the vocal minority think their rights supersede the responsible majority.
 

eikelbijter

Senior member
Aug 27, 2009
534
304
136
It’s the hypocrisy that we on the left hate that is coming from the extreme right. So accept their right to choose if they mask or vaccinate. But yet they can control what complete strangers do with an unwanted pregnancy? Respect their right to shop without a mask. But then they complain when a private business limits who can enter. Why the vocal minority think their rights supersede the responsible majority.
That's exactly SO many of you putting me in the group of right-wingers is so bizarrely wrong. I'm NOT a right winger AT ALL. I can't BELIEVE that Roe v Wade might actually be overturned in this country, it's a disaster and a huge step back to the fucking middle ages, pardon my French.
 

eikelbijter

Senior member
Aug 27, 2009
534
304
136
Here's my 2 cents on the whole matter, now almost 2 years into it.

The right has yet again successfully poisoned the well as far as any mitigation efforts go. And to be honest, I don't know if there is any strong appetite for any strong measures, anyway - regardless of what a tiny sliver of majorities in polls show (or at least, used to). And we're seeing this in other countries too, not just the US.

The GOP is already all but assured to take the house, maybe the Dems have an outside shot at keeping and/or slightly expanding their Senate majority but unlikely. And once again the Dems are losing the messaging battle, BIG time (think CRT, but worse). They now risk making this a losing political issue and head into 2022/2024 and suffer even bigger losses than predicted. I hate to use the term damage control, but if we want to avoid GOP super majorities, that's exactly what it is. Mind you, I'm not saying this because the GOP is going to run on some sort of wildly popular or useful agenda, but their messaging machine is great at the last minute.

None of these are necessarily my original ideas, but what I would focus on moving forward:

1). Continue to work on, refine and promote vaccines. Mandates where they make sense (healthcare, travel industry, military, etc). Try to turn this into the seasonal flu shot in the near future.

2). Continue to also focus on therapeutics - go "Operation Warp Speed" on this and try to release something akin to Tamiflu. OTC even? Not sure where Pfizer and Merck are with this. Maybe a pipe dream but at least something that your family doc can easily and readily prescribe. Even if it's not a silver bullet but decreases symptom severity/duration (like Tamiflu) and keeps you out of the hospital, it would be huge. This could be Biden's legacy, too.

3). Agree with more at-home tests, cheaper, more available (yes I know this has been mentioned and is being worked on).

The above 3 alone would GREATLY decrease the heavy burden on our strained healthcare system.

4). Spend money to improve surge capacity at our busiest hospitals. I don't know if this means expanding ICU wings, ER capacity, entirely new buildings for overflow altogether (not to mention the additional staffing it would require). It would probably be very costly and wouldn't happen overnight, but this step must be taken as there will continue to be future variants especially as vaccination holdouts continue. It's a self-fulfilling prophecy at this point. But we can't continue to have our healthcare system go through the ringer every time there's a surge.

5). Do WHATEVER IT TAKES to help with healthcare worker burnout, fatigue, and threats. Make it a federal crime to threaten a healthcare worker. Offer FULL student loan repayment for those physicians that have been mired in this muck the longest (I think some states have done this, or something similar?). Whatever incentives/protections it takes.


Just my thoughts, happy to hear any feedback.
I'm still not convinced that vaccine mandates make much sense at all, even in settings you mentioned, but everything else is MORE than reasonable.

What boggles my mind is that so many lefties don't realize that forcing these vaccines on people who are let's say skeptical, might just lead to that Orange Disaster becoming president AGAIN! Is that trade-off worth it?

I know, you guys are gonna say that's ridiculous, but that's what we thought the FIRST time this disgrace of a "man" ran.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,651
50,912
136
It's not weird at all. Only your fixation on it is.

Exactly why would I want to avoid a vaccine if I had been infected?

If I had been infected, I would only be happy to get the extra protection that a vaccine offers. Especially given the mutating nature of COVID and the breakthrough infections.

Natural Immunity is another common talking point for Antivaxxers, but it doesn't hold any water as an excuse to not get vaccinated.

Likewise your appeal to save money by vaccinating less, seems utterly absurd given the prices of vaccine vs the cost of even one hospitalization.

Your shtick is quite tiresome. You claim to be super well informed, then repeat absurd antivaxx talking points.
Yeah the whole ‘I’m not an anti-vaxxer but I’m going to constantly push anti-vaccine nonsense’ is really getting old.

As omicron shows, natural immunity is not an option.
1) The goverment of the UK seems to agree with me. Are THEY anti-vaxxers?

2) I didn't say LA, I said on MY WALK. You don't even know where I live exactly and I promise you, the level of irrational fear differs GREATLY by neighborhood. Again with the incredibly dumb insinuation that I would be lying.....
okay so you’re saying in one small part of LA that’s the case? Seems important to say, right?

Remember when you said getting covid again was a viable alternative to vaccination? Lol.
 

Heartbreaker

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2006
4,337
5,456
136
I'm not saying anyone should "avoid" vaccination. Why do you guys keep putting words in my mouth? It really shows you guys are not thinking clearly.

Sure you did.

You argued that Health care workers who had COVID shouldn't have to comply with vaccine mandates.

Non compliance is avoidance.

Listen man, natural immunity is real, and the more I learn about it, the more I realize it's robust, and as far as protection against severe disease goes, long lasting, even with the new variants that we KNOW of.

And again, you are advocating against vaccines. How else could obtain "natural" immunity unless you avoid vaccination. Advocating "natural" herd immunity is again another antivaxxer stance.

The WHO by the way says to NOT boost healthy people; are THEY anti-vaxxers? Are THEY a fringe group?

The WHO isn't against boosters because of lack of effectiveness. They wan't wealthy countries to send those vaccines to poorer countries first. It's about morality, not disease protection:
Distributing Covid-19 vaccine booster shots in some countries while inoculations across Africa lag is "immoral," according to the director general of the World Health Organization (WHO).

WHO would have no issue with boosters if Africa was vaccinated, you still would, so they aren't "on your side".


You keep calling my claims "absurd", but they are clearly not.

No, your claims are absurd, you just spew a bunch of antivaxxer talking points. Then point to some action from somewhere in the world, out of context, and claim it backs you, when it doesn't.
 

eikelbijter

Senior member
Aug 27, 2009
534
304
136
Yeah the whole ‘I’m not an anti-vaxxer but I’m going to constantly push anti-vaccine nonsense’ is really getting old.

As omicron shows, natural immunity is not an option.

okay so you’re saying in one small part of LA that’s the case? Seems important to say, right?

Remember when you said getting covid again was a viable alternative to vaccination? Lol.
I haven't said a SINGLE ANTI vaccine thing, except perhaps I had hoped they had worked in a sterilizing manner for longer than they turn out to do.

Show me ONE study that shows vaccination works better at protecting you from severe disease or death than previous infection AT EQUAL TIMES. The last part is crucial, because, whether you like it or not, being exposed to Covid again after recovery from a previous infection has an extremely similar result in your body as getting a booster.

As far as LA goes: what are you going on about? "One small part"? Now it's my turn to LOL.

Listen, let me put it this way: the whiter, the more scared, and of course, the richer the more scared. My neighborhood is more of the first. It's saddens me, because I know they have wildly inflated assumptions of the REAL risk. It just doesn't make sense to make kids live in a world where the other is so scary, when the reality is there is virtually no danger to them, except a small subset with certain comorbidities. Vaccinate those and let them live!








You cannot make claims about COVID-19 without links from accepted scientific sources.
Again, see bolded above. In-your-opinion claims about COVID-19 without links to back it up are considered misinformation.
Posting misinformation about COVID-19 is not allowed on these forums. If you post it, you better be able to back it up.


esquared
Anandtech Forum Director
 
Last edited by a moderator:

eikelbijter

Senior member
Aug 27, 2009
534
304
136
Sure you did.

You argued that Health care workers who had COVID shouldn't have to comply with vaccine mandates.

Non compliance is avoidance.



And again, you are advocating against vaccines. How else could obtain "natural" immunity unless you avoid vaccination. Advocating "natural" herd immunity is again another antivaxxer stance.



The WHO isn't against boosters because of lack of effectiveness. They wan't wealthy countries to send those vaccines to poorer countries first. It's about morality, not disease protection:


WHO would have no issue with boosters if Africa was vaccinated, you still would, so they aren't "on your side".




No, your claims are absurd, you just spew a bunch of antivaxxer talking points. Then point to some action from somewhere in the world, out of context, and claim it backs you, when it doesn't.
Well, at least you make some real arguments.

Firstly I'm not ADVOCATING natural immunity, I never said one should PREFER getting Covid over getting a vaccine, quite the contrary. For you to suggest that is disingenuous . I've had multiple discussions about this with my hesitant boss who believed all the BS about supposed side effects. Partly because of me, we are now able to continue working. She's older, and I explained to her simply that the risk to her health from getting infected for the first time is substantially higher if she was unvaccinated.

As far as the boosters go: we're not playing a game here, it's not being on each other's side. But yes, their main reasoning is that we should help those in poor countries who haven't been able to even get their first shot BEFORE we boost healthy people. They haven't even gotten to whether we need to boost EVERYBODY yet!

Now the most tricky one is that mandate. You're right I guess that it's too easy for me to say I'm not in favor of avoidance, because I believe we can leave that decision up to the man or woman that not that long ago RISKED his or her life BEFORE we had vaccines, or even knew much at all, those we called HEROES, now MUST take the shot or be terminated. Not when we now see that the current booster shot goes down to 35% protection against reinfection in less than 3 months.

It just doesn't make any sense because we are STILL using the vaccine against the wild type! If we're always going to be this far behind, it means we have to boost every two months for this to be sterilizing. That MIGHT be feasible in a medical setting, but that's NOT going to fly with the general population.

Now finally, as far as I've heard for the last few years, we couldn't GET enough nurses. And now, in a pandemic, we're going to fire this many? This is going to backfire BADLY.




You cannot make claims about COVID-19 without links from accepted scientific sources.
Again, see bolded above. In-your-opinion claims about COVID-19 numbers without links to back it up are considered misinformation.
Posting misinformation about COVID-19 is not allowed on these forums. If you post it, you better be able to back it up.


esquared
Anandtech Forum Director
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Iron Woode

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 10, 1999
31,003
12,544
136
Show me ONE study that shows vaccination works better at protecting you from severe disease or death than previous infection AT EQUAL TIMES. The last part is crucial, because, whether you like it or not, being exposed to Covid again after recovery from a previous infection has an extremely similar result in your body as getting a booster.
How about one word:

smallpox
 

Heartbreaker

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2006
4,337
5,456
136
Well, at least you make some real arguments.

Firstly I'm not ADVOCATING natural immunity, I never said one should PREFER getting Covid over getting a vaccine, quite the contrary.

You just finished praising natural immunity, after arguing it should be allowed as a vaccine exemption.


But yes, their main reasoning is that we should help those in poor countries who haven't been able to even get their first shot BEFORE we boost healthy people.

Your posts are all over the place. It doesn't seem like you have one or two arguments against vaccines, but are instead throwing everything against the wall, in hopes anything sticks. This is what makes you seem disingenuous. Previously you were expressing cost concerns about vaccine mandates. Now seem ready to fund vaccinating the rest of the world, just to keep the mandates out of your backyard.

because I believe we can leave that decision up to the man or woman that not that long ago RISKED his or her life BEFORE we had vaccines, or even knew much at all, those we called HEROES, now MUST take the shot or be terminated.

This is a very weak "appeal to emotion". If you were someone I respected, I would say that that's beneath you, but it's just feeling like a pattern already.

Yeah, how dare we make our brave, all American Hero's get a vaccine shot.

Back in real life, getting vaccinations have been required in the past for health care workers and students to attend school, and it's no big deal, even for children, let alone HEROES, to roll up their arms and get a a jab.

IMO, no one should be more prioritized that front line health care workers, and in places where they had to choose, the loss of staff was very small.

It's fucking absurd that any front line health care worker wouldn't get vaccinated. They deal intimately, with the most vulnerable patients, and their higher odds of spreading disease to the very patients they should be helping, is why health care vaccine mandates existed before COVID, and why they should be prioritized now.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,651
50,912
136
I haven't said a SINGLE ANTI vaccine thing, except perhaps I had hoped they had worked in a sterilizing manner for longer than they turn out to do.

Show me ONE study that shows vaccination works better at protecting you from severe disease or death than previous infection AT EQUAL TIMES. The last part is crucial, because, whether you like it or not, being exposed to Covid again after recovery from a previous infection has an extremely similar result in your body as getting a booster.

As far as LA goes: what are you going on about? "One small part"? Now it's my turn to LOL.

Listen, let me put it this way: the whiter, the more scared, and of course, the richer the more scared. My neighborhood is more of the first. It's saddens me, because I know they have wildly inflated assumptions of the REAL risk. It just doesn't make sense to make kids live in a world where the other is so scary, when the reality is there is virtually no danger to them, except a small subset with certain comorbidities. Vaccinate those and let them live!
Thank you for proving my point.
 

eikelbijter

Senior member
Aug 27, 2009
534
304
136
Now seem ready to fund vaccinating the rest of the world, just to keep the mandates out of your backyard.

This sentence alone shows your utter lack of reading comprehension. How does "But yes, their main reasoning is that we should help those in poor countries who haven't been able to even get their first shot BEFORE we boost healthy people." become ME ready the fund the world? Sorry, your response just doesn't make any sense.

Again, I NEVER said one should try to achieve natural immunity instead of getting vaccinated. NEVER! I am, and have ALWAYS been talking about people who have had Covid already. Whether they shoulda been vaccinated is at that point irrelevant as to how much protection they will get against future infections. To deny that they have any protection at all is as anti-scientific as it gets.

Now you could take "advocating" to mean "talk in favor of", or as "trying to convince to ". I'm guilty of the first, but certainly not the second. I fully acknowledge that full vaccination even a year ago gives high protection against severe disease. Unfortunately it doesn't protect against infection much anymore, unless it was quite recent. I'm merely saying that the same goes for having had Covid. Yes, getting a shot after that will increase you Ab titers , and even activate ones that are outside of the perfect match with the RBD of the wild type. That's why we can restore sterilizing immunity with the old recipe against the new variant.

You know, every action has a reaction, every measure has advantages and disadvantages. To pretend like the mandates don't have a cost is foolish; to write it off as insignificant is dangerous.
 

NWRMidnight

Diamond Member
Jun 18, 2001
3,045
2,653
136
1) The goverment of the UK seems to agree with me. Are THEY anti-vaxxers?

2) I didn't say LA, I said on MY WALK. You don't even know where I live exactly and I promise you, the level of irrational fear differs GREATLY by neighborhood. Again with the incredibly dumb insinuation that I would be lying.....
Another government from another country (UK) agrees with you on what's taking place in the United States, and what's best for the citizens of the United States? OR is their research based on the UK and what is happening in the UK based on their citizens, which have hundreds of different influences that are vastly different than here in the United states?

Basically your argument is like trying to argue that the water in New York is the same as the water in Dallas based on the research done in Dallas using Dallas's water supply.
 

eikelbijter

Senior member
Aug 27, 2009
534
304
136
Another government from another country (UK) agrees with you on what's taking place in the United States, and what's best for the citizens of the United States? OR is their research based on the UK and what is happening in the UK based on their citizens, which have hundreds of different influences that are vastly different than here in the United states?

Basically your argument is like trying to argue that the water in New York is the same as the water in Dallas based on the research done in Dallas using Dallas's water supply.
This is about humans, and the English are not THAT different from the Americans. Well, I guess the latter's children are far more obese, which IS a serious comorbidity. Your water analogy is preposterous, I wont even go there...

Whole point I was trying to make was, that believing under 18s should be vaccinated indiscriminately is NOT accepted science worldwide, it just isn't. In the black & white world of THIS forum you guys seem to only want to have it either/or but it's not that simple.
 

eikelbijter

Senior member
Aug 27, 2009
534
304
136
How about one word:

smallpox
Interesting history about smallpox; learned a lot today! It's a terrible comparison to Corona, you know, with a 30% death rate an such.

So, I decided to visit the CDC again and see what's the official word. I was glad to find PLENTY of information about convalescent immunity. It was quite broad in its scope, including even that latest Israel study, all the while legitimately raising the possible concerns.

CDC

It says things like:

"A systematic review and meta-analysis including data from three vaccine efficacy trials and four observational studies from the US, Israel, and the United Kingdom, found no significant difference in the overall level of protection provided by infection as compared with protection provided by vaccination; this included studies from both prior to and during the period in which Delta was the predominant variant [79] "

Upon reading that referenced paper I'm amazed to read the conclusion:

"While vaccinations are highly effective at protecting against infection and severe COVID-19 disease, our review demonstrates that natural immunity in COVID-recovered individuals is, at least, equivalent to the protection afforded by full vaccination of COVID-naïve populations. There is a modest and incremental relative benefit to vaccination in COVID-recovered individuals; however, the net benefit is marginal on an absolute basis. COVID-recovered individuals represent a distinctly different benefit-risk calculus. Therefore, vaccination of COVID-recovered individuals should be subject to clinical equipoise and individual preference."

This is right from the horse's mouth. Doesn't sound too different from what I've been saying. Now I know, Omicron changes the game; but it does for the vaccines too. This is NOT as cut and dried as you guys want.

So we're clear: I'm not even saying no one should take a booster, or a vaccination. We should make them available to anyone who wants one, but we can't say that it's settled science either way.

 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,651
50,912
136
This is about humans, and the English are not THAT different from the Americans. Well, I guess the latter's children are far more obese, which IS a serious comorbidity. Your water analogy is preposterous, I wont even go there...

Whole point I was trying to make was, that believing under 18s should be vaccinated indiscriminately is NOT accepted science worldwide, it just isn't. In the black & white world of THIS forum you guys seem to only want to have it either/or but it's not that simple.
Lol ‘indiscriminately’.

I guess that’s what comes from either not understanding English or being a huge liar.
 
Reactions: eikelbijter
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |