Its not in Raptor Lake, so what Intel core are you referring to ? Server parts ?(1) Is AVX-512 exclusive to x86 cores? AMD and Intel are certainly implementing it on their latest CPU cores. However, i haven't heard of an ARM core with AVX 512. Is this possible?
(1) Is AVX-512 exclusive to x86 cores? AMD and Intel are certainly implementing it on their latest CPU cores. However, i haven't heard of an ARM core with AVX 512. Is this possible?
Its not in Raptor Lake, so what Intel core are you referring to ? Server parts ?
AVX is an extension to the x86 ISA, so it's not possible for ARM to support it by definition. However, the operations themselves can (and in some cases, do) have parallels in ARM via NEON and SVE.(1) Is AVX-512 exclusive to x86 cores? AMD and Intel are certainly implementing it on their latest CPU cores. However, i haven't heard of an ARM core with AVX 512. Is this possible?
Yes, in terms of hardware, Golden Cove and Raptor Cove have AVX-512 support. It's disabled by what's ultimately a firmware lock.But didn't Alder Lake already have AVX 512 in the Golden Cove cores? Intel disabled it via a bios update.
No, the argument is kinda a non-sequitur. Apple's simply chosen to focus their efforts on other areas (single thread performance, power, area) instead of throughput.(2) I have come across various people who have posited that Apple's P cores do not have SMT since they have a very large ROB. I'll try post links to the OPs who said so -I can find them, but the idea is that the need for multithreading is eliminated since the core is very good at Out-of-Order execution. Is this correct?
(2) I have come across various people who have posited that Apple's P cores do not have SMT since they have a very large ROB. I'll try post links to the OPs who said so -I can find them, but the idea is that the need for multithreading is eliminated since the core is very good at Out-of-Order execution. Is this correct?
The picture shows CCD's being put onto what amounts to an IOD. The patent itself instead seems to relate to mixing layers of different dies from different nodes, allowing to extend one die with additional layers of another die.What is the significance of below 3d vcache patent ?
Looks like talking about CCD sitting on top of a v cache chiplet rather than the reverse given that the CCD is typically fabbed on the more advanced node.What is the significance of below 3d vcache patent ?