CPUZ 1.73 Benchmark Thread

[YBS1]

Nice, I just noticed how good of a multi thread score that was in comparison to the 4c/8t Intel chips. Makes me want to see how a 9590 north of 5GHz would do, surely someone in here has one?

 

[Burpo]

My Second System.

CPU: Intel Corei7 4790K Without Overclock.

Why does my rating down Guys.

Different motherboard or different RAM..

 

[BHZ-GTR]

My Ram Is G.skill TridentX DDR3 2400 MHZ 2*4 = 8 GB

 

[sm625]

The ST and MT scores are probably scaled totally different, like miles vs kilometers, so you cant directly compare the two. If you test a single core cpu then the MT score is going to be way lower than the ST score.

 

[soccerballtux]

The ST and MT scores are probably scaled totally different, like miles vs kilometers, so you cant directly compare the two. If you test a single core cpu then the MT score is going to be way lower than the ST score.

this seems to be an Intel CPU problem. My FX is scaling great

maybe skylake fixes it

 

[know of fence]

The ST and MT scores are probably scaled totally different, like miles vs kilometers, so you cant directly compare the two. If you test a single core cpu then the MT score is going to be way lower than the ST score.

Notice how for the pentium III the ST and MT scores are the exactly the same, which they would be if Bench wasn't borked.
Intel's pride and joy, the Atom heralded the era of Fast Enough computing and affordable Ultra Small Form Factor notebooks, though it was quickly slammed by critics for its inability to fluidly playback HD flash video (let's say, of cats) inside a browser.

 

[Yuriman]

An update with a bit more overclock:

I was disappointed to find I can't get 4.8ghz stable with my Zotac ITX board, while I could on my older ASRock Z77.

 

[Markfw]

Well, when I run it, it makes my PC reboot.

 

[PPB]

Well, when I run it, it makes my PC reboot.

Unstable overclock? When I run this bench with my 4790K the MT score number has some variation for like 15 seconds, then the bench stops at an avg. number. Anyone getting this kind of behaviour when running the bench?

 

[Dion250]

Looks like the i5 4670K is identical to the i5 6600K at same clocks, I wonder what RAM was used with the i5 6600K, DDR3? or slower DDR4?

Corsair 3200. But I could only get it to 3100.. 1550x2.

 

[SlowSpyder]

Have a screen shot but no place to host it currently. Just ran it at 5.1GHz, 1204ST / 7433MT.

 

[Yuriman]

Just drop it on imgur.

 

[MongGrel]

Turned mine down a bit even, but still.

Silly old Hexacore.

That's enough playing around I guess.

Tempted to go higher, but nah.

 

[SlowSpyder]

Just drop it on imgur.

Reran it and have the screenshot:

Scores improved a smallish amount, too (1208 / 7554)

 

[Kenmitch]

Wound up picking up a 4790k today at Fry's price matched to microcenter

Very early stages of the overclocking adventure. Seems like a decent chip so far. It's been forever and a day that I've tried overclocking a Haswell chip! Trying to remember what to fiddle with in the bios.

 

[MongGrel]

Wound up picking up a 4790k today at Fry's price matched to microcenter

Very early stages of the overclocking adventure. Seems like a decent chip so far. It's been forever and a day that I've tried overclocking a Haswell chip! Trying to remember what to fiddle with in the bios.

Looks good out of the box.

I'm sure it will get better, I'll probably never have a Haswell I imagine.

Been milking my X58s a long time now. ()

 

[YBS1]

this seems to be an Intel CPU problem. My FX is scaling great

maybe skylake fixes it

No, I don't think it's an Intel problem. I think whatever this bench is testing really thrives on AMD's 4 module / 8 core (or however you want to argue it) architecture rather than Intel's hyperthreaded logical cores. I'm going to try disabling hyperthreading and just run 8 true cores @ 4.5 to see how that compares to the 4c/8t Intels and the 4m/8c AMDs.

 

[YBS1]

Yeah, I'm guessing it's just really light on FPU use allowing the FX to really act as 8 pure cores. Eight real Intel cores just demolishes the 4c/8t Intel's.

 

[Edgemeal]

]SINCE THIS BENCH IS BETA I'M GOING TO STOP HERE!

Exceptions made, MongGrel, SlowSpyder, Kenmitch.

 

[Enigmoid]

No, I don't think it's an Intel problem. I think whatever this bench is testing really thrives on AMD's 4 module / 8 core (or however you want to argue it) architecture rather than Intel's hyperthreaded logical cores. I'm going to try disabling hyperthreading and just run 8 true cores @ 4.5 to see how that compares to the 4c/8t Intels and the 4m/8c AMDs.

The bench cannot scale properly on intel chips. Core scaling is very poor.

 

[YBS1]

The bench cannot scale properly on intel chips. Core scaling is very poor.

Logical cores are not scaling well, physical cores scale like mad, see post #123 above.

 

[Kenmitch]

Looks good out of the box.

I'm sure it will get better, I'll probably never have a Haswell I imagine.

Been milking my X58s a long time now. ()

We'll see. Went downhill from there

Set multiplier for 48x upped vcore 0.020v's booted windows did some quick testing which seemed fine....Hmm.

Went for the illusive 50x upping vcore 0.040v's more which probably was too little....Boot loop from hell is what I got! Bsod and reboot followed by the loop. Clearing cmos was a no go! Pulling battery and clearing cmos was a no go! Pulled 1 stick of ram and she booted with bios warning screen. Set to 42x profile booted and shutdown. Put stick back in boot loops. Swapped to other slots boot loops. Go figure!

 

[soccerballtux]

No, I don't think it's an Intel problem. I think whatever this bench is testing really thrives on AMD's 4 module / 8 core (or however you want to argue it) architecture rather than Intel's hyperthreaded logical cores. I'm going to try disabling hyperthreading and just run 8 true cores @ 4.5 to see how that compares to the 4c/8t Intels and the 4m/8c AMDs.

look, I don't get many chances to brag, OK?

 

[Enigmoid]

Logical cores are not scaling well, physical cores scale like mad, see post #123 above.

6.8x scaling, with HT, for 8 cores on a synthetic benchmark is pretty poor.

 

[YBS1]

look, I don't get many chances to brag, OK?

I wasn't knocking down your chance to brag, the FX is shining pretty well on this.