Mr Pickles
Diamond Member
- Feb 24, 2006
- 4,104
- 1
- 0
Originally posted by: minendo
I almost mistaked that picture for an AT&T ad, but realized the 4th bar was missing.
lol mistaked...
Originally posted by: minendo
I almost mistaked that picture for an AT&T ad, but realized the 4th bar was missing.
:roll:Originally posted by: DocHolliday
www.googlemaps.com paste this 38.873749,-77.233517 and that's where the sign was!! Sigh... I'm bored I guess...
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
:roll:Originally posted by: DocHolliday
www.googlemaps.com paste this 38.873749,-77.233517 and that's where the sign was!! Sigh... I'm bored I guess...
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
Quick, head here.
even better! :laugh:
Really?Originally posted by: zoiks
Fake.
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
Quick, head here.
even better! :laugh:
Really?Originally posted by: zoiks
Fake.
Originally posted by: zoiks
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
Quick, head here.
even better! :laugh:
Really?Originally posted by: zoiks
Fake.
I wasn't able to open the above pics at bbzzdd for some reason. Saw the first one though and I've seen similar stuff.
Originally posted by: RESmonkey
Why would cops bother to find out who wrote that? Isn't it a harmless prank?
It's not fake you doof. I even posted the password reset code so you can go try on a local sign. What more do you want? A printed and signed picture by the cops?Originally posted by: zoiks
I wasn't able to open the above pics at bbzzdd for some reason. Saw the first one though and I've seen similar stuff.
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
Well, at least you didn't do like most of ATOT and jump to a faulty conclusion based upon speculation.Originally posted by: zoiks
I wasn't able to open the above pics at bbzzdd for some reason. Saw the first one though and I've seen similar stuff.
Originally posted by: Evadman
It's not fake you doof. I even posted the password reset code so you can go try on a local sign. What more do you want? A printed and signed picture by the cops?Originally posted by: zoiks
I wasn't able to open the above pics at bbzzdd for some reason. Saw the first one though and I've seen similar stuff.
Originally posted by: Quintox
I really want to do this badly, but I'm scared of getting caught while doing it.
Originally posted by: zoiks
I wasn't able to open the above pics at bbzzdd for some reason. Saw the first one though and I've seen similar stuff.
Originally posted by: Evadman
Originally posted by: jjones
I wasn't able to open the above pics at bbzzdd for some reason. Saw the first one though and I've seen similar stuff.
I also should point out (because I am an annoying dick) that this statement is mutually exclusive. If you couldn't open the pics, how did you see the pics? Or even better, how did you see the pics and then determine that they are fake?
The standard "This is a 'shop, I can tell from the pixels and from seeing quite a few shops in my time" doesn't work. did you even see the other 'shops? or did you have problems with those too?
You couldn't tell from the pixels since you couldn't see any pixels. Though I suppose you could make the assumption that you have seen quite a few 'shops in your time, therefore all images are 'shops, even without looking at pixels. But that invalidates half of the argument.
To break down your statement:
1. I wasn't able to open the pics at bbzzdd
2. I saw the first pic
3. I saw similar pics before.
1 and 3 are mutually exclusive, same with 1 and 3. 2 and 3 could be correct, but only if number 1 is correct. So, which of the 3 statements are you lying about? Or do you just have problems in general? :laugh:
Crap, you are totally correct. Thanks for catching that, my stupid.Originally posted by: jjones
Hehe, you quoted the wrong poster.
Originally posted by: Evadman
Originally posted by: zoiks
I wasn't able to open the above pics at bbzzdd for some reason. Saw the first one though and I've seen similar stuff.
I also should point out (because I am an annoying dick) that this statement is mutually exclusive. If you couldn't open the pics, how did you see the pics? Or even better, how did you see the pics and then determine that they are fake?
The standard "This is a 'shop, I can tell from the pixels and from seeing quite a few shops in my time" doesn't work. did you even see the other 'shops? or did you have problems with those too?
You couldn't tell from the pixels since you couldn't see any pixels. Though I suppose you could make the assumption that you have seen quite a few 'shops in your time, therefore all images are 'shops, even without looking at pixels. But that invalidates half of the argument.
To break down your statement:
1. I wasn't able to open the pics at bbzzdd
2. I saw the first pic
3. I saw similar pics before.
1 and 3 are mutually exclusive, same with 1 and 3. 2 and 3 could be correct, but only if number 1 is correct. So, which of the 3 statements are you lying about? Or do you just have problems in general? :laugh:
Originally posted by: zoiks
I admire your details in pointing that out. Can I send you an e-cookie?
Originally posted by: Evadman
Originally posted by: zoiks
I admire your details in pointing that out. Can I send you an e-cookie?
Your undying admiration will be acceptable. If that is not possible, a cookie would be a good substitute.