After reading part of this thread and initially adding my incorrect assertions, I decided to research CRT.
Critical Race Theory, so misunderstood by so many, is actually a university law course.
So, I apologize in advance if the following material has been covered:
Duke University's Law School's description of Course 504 - Critical Race Theory:
"The course affords students an opportunity to think about the ways in which racism, sexism, classism, and heterosexism are inextricably interwoven as well as an opportunity to challenge critically our most basic assumptions about race, law, and justice."
From UCLA Law:
"Throughout American history, race has profoundly affected the lives of individuals, the growth of social institutions, the substance of culture, and the workings of our political economy.
"Not surprisingly, this impact has been substantially mediated through the law and legal institutions. To understand the deep interconnections between race and law, and particularly the ways in which race and law are mutually constitutive, is an extraordinary intellectual challenge.
"That is precisely the project of Critical Race Theory (CRT). This course will pursue this project by exploring emerging themes within CRT."
The problem with lawyers is that they tend to author long-winded descriptions. This is why I'm just going to post the link to
Columbia University Law School's lengthy description of CRT:
https://news.columbia.edu/news/what-critical-race-theory-and-why-everyone-talking-about-it-0
Because so many people, including a fair number of Blacks, still think CRT is actually Black History, a couple of months ago, I came up with a one-sentence explanation of CRT that could simplify matters:
Critical Race Theory is a premise that posits skin color and race determine the outcomes of most decisions, laws and behavior in the U.S.