bryanW1995
Lifer
- May 22, 2007
- 11,144
- 32
- 91
It would be faster, though I don't have a lot of data on x25m g2 160gb RAID 0 drives. I suspect that exdeath, groberts, and a few others in memory/storage forums have more info.
I wasn't thinking clearly earlier. I saved my single disk as-ssd images on my old ssd, which is now disconnected and doesn't play nice with the new setup. Here's the 2nd RAID upload, however:
for comparison, here is what it was before the firmware update:
edit Actually, I just found an x25m g2 80gb RAID 0 article: http://www.servethehome.com/windows-dynamic-disk-versus-ich10r-raid-0-intel-x25-m-g2-80gb/
I'm not sure how much faster the 160 gb is vs the 80 gb, but from looking at this I can tell you that the crucial m4 256gb is faster. I was around 510 read and 270 write in sequentials, though I can't remember the other scores. I know that I saw some at AT the other day... ok, there are some m4 numbers on this page: http://www.anandtech.com/show/5735/micron-c400-msata-128gb-ssd-review/2
I wasn't thinking clearly earlier. I saved my single disk as-ssd images on my old ssd, which is now disconnected and doesn't play nice with the new setup. Here's the 2nd RAID upload, however:
for comparison, here is what it was before the firmware update:
edit Actually, I just found an x25m g2 80gb RAID 0 article: http://www.servethehome.com/windows-dynamic-disk-versus-ich10r-raid-0-intel-x25-m-g2-80gb/
I'm not sure how much faster the 160 gb is vs the 80 gb, but from looking at this I can tell you that the crucial m4 256gb is faster. I was around 510 read and 270 write in sequentials, though I can't remember the other scores. I know that I saw some at AT the other day... ok, there are some m4 numbers on this page: http://www.anandtech.com/show/5735/micron-c400-msata-128gb-ssd-review/2
Last edited: