- Feb 19, 2015
- 616
- 23
- 81
Read a couple of reviews and still don't know if the MX200 is better then the 100 or not, esp. in the 250GB size which seems important to mention since diff sizes give diff performance apparently.
On one hand the MX200 seems to have new or better features like
- Dynamic Write Acceleration.. why is that unique to the 250GB model?
- better overprovisioning in that size model
- according to this review there's huge diff between bootup time in Windows 7, namely 5.1 s vs 14 s.. does that make sense.. it's with the 500GB though so not sure the same would apply to the 250GB models
On the downside, the MX200 scores pretty bad with intensive IO workloads according to the Anandtech review here. Especially the average service time shows a VERY large latency in comparison to all other drives. The review says "Especially the performance of the 250GB is surprisingly bad and it looks like Crucial's SLC cache implementation isn't optimal for intensive IO workloads."
Does intensive workloads also include for example having 15 tabs open at the same time in Chrome?
So in context of both performance and endurance, which is the better choice for the 250GB model? Price is very close so that doesn't matter.
Would wanna buy it these weekend so thanks for all good advice!
On one hand the MX200 seems to have new or better features like
- Dynamic Write Acceleration.. why is that unique to the 250GB model?
- better overprovisioning in that size model
- according to this review there's huge diff between bootup time in Windows 7, namely 5.1 s vs 14 s.. does that make sense.. it's with the 500GB though so not sure the same would apply to the 250GB models
On the downside, the MX200 scores pretty bad with intensive IO workloads according to the Anandtech review here. Especially the average service time shows a VERY large latency in comparison to all other drives. The review says "Especially the performance of the 250GB is surprisingly bad and it looks like Crucial's SLC cache implementation isn't optimal for intensive IO workloads."
Does intensive workloads also include for example having 15 tabs open at the same time in Chrome?
So in context of both performance and endurance, which is the better choice for the 250GB model? Price is very close so that doesn't matter.
Would wanna buy it these weekend so thanks for all good advice!
Last edited: