The word knowledge implies observable reality, not bronze age stories mommy told you were true because Santa Claus, or someone, is able to see you when you're sleeping, knows when you're awake, and knows when you've been bad or good.
Never met anyone in real life that called it the authorized version.
What are you rambling on about? What you quoted had nothing to do with anything you wrote.The word knowledge implies observable reality, not bronze age stories mommy told you were true because Santa Claus, or someone, is able to see you when you're sleeping, knows when you're awake, and knows when you've been bad or good.
You posted a picture with the word "know" in it, in an attempt to provide "knowledge" to someone else.What are you rambling on about? What you quoted had nothing to do with anything you wrote.
How many false assumptions can you throw my way?
My parents never took me to church, I was an atheist up until my mid 20s.
To the list.
I did not know that the non-existence of Jack Chick is a thing. How can a non-existent being leave tracks everywhere? Checkmate, Nonchickians.A fair number of that 28% of Christians that are biblical literalists (y'know the ones buckwheat pretends do not exist) affirm quite explicitly that only the King James Version is the literal word of God. Jack Chick is a notable example (except for the fact that he doesn't exist according to buckwheat).
In your 20s? Dang, she must have been sweeet!My parents never took me to church, I was an atheist up until my mid 20s.
No, you weren't. If you aren't an atheist now, then you were never an atheist before. Once an Atheist, Always an Atheist, didn't you know?My parents never took me to church, I was an atheist up until my mid 20s.
Chicks work in mysterious ways.I did not know that the non-existence of Jack Chick is a thing. How can a non-existent being leave tracks everywhere? Checkmate, Nonchickians.
There are KJVOnlyists but none of them take the bible 100% literally, none of them. Your continual lying about this doesn't change this fact.A fair number of that 28% of Christians that are biblical literalists (y'know the ones buckwheat pretends do not exist) affirm quite explicitly that only the King James Version is the literal word of God. Jack Chick is a notable example (except for the fact that he doesn't exist according to buckwheat).
I wish it was something like that. Bottom line, dude's assumptions about me are false.In your 20s? Dang, she must have been sweeet!
My apologies for making assumptions. He must have been sweeet!I wish it was something like that. Bottom line, dude's assumptions about me are false.
Churches losing tax exempt status because they won't marry gays....it looks like its still an ongoing issue. dailycaller.com/2015/06/26/roberts-warns-churches-could-lose-tax-exempt-status-for-opposing-gay-marriageNo, that certainly never happened here, nor was it ever proposed to happen. Further, it's strange that you recall this being an issue with such certainty.
The story you linked says no such thing.Churches losing tax exempt status because they won't marry gays....it looks like its still an ongoing issue. dailycaller.com/2015/06/26/roberts-warns-churches-could-lose-tax-exempt-status-for-opposing-gay-marriage
There are KJVOnlyists but none of them take the bible 100% literally, none of them. Your continual lying about this doesn't change this fact.
Jack Chick existed and he didn't take the bible 100% literally.
edit: I guess he's still alive...
He still doesn't take the bible 100% literally.
The story you linked says no such thing.
The story you linked says no such thing.
Your specific claim was that churches will lose tax exempt status for refusing to marry gays. The story you linked in no way supports this claim. "The possibility is now very real reality" is a nonsensical assertion.It says what I said at the beginning it is an issue that churches will lose tax exempt status because they are now infringing on a constitutional right for gays to get married. I thought that this was already the case but it seems that it hasn't been put into full effect yet. But the possibility is now very real reality.
It provides nothing to support your claim.Did you read the first paragraph
Just so I understand Rafael has admitted if he has to make a decision where there is a conflict between the constitution and the bible he will side with the bible?
The head of the Christian Taliban is running for POTUS?
Only when they have oil, and that's been going on since WWI.Well we just had 8 years of potus siding in with Islam
Did you read the first paragraph
www.newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2015/04/30/not-news-obama-admin-admits-tax-exempt-status-non-complying-churchesIt provides nothing to support your claim.
There's no point in arguing with them. Seriously the question was worded terrible. Im sure you could interview those same people and begin asking them if they think such and such should be taken literally, just like the sun and shield verse and they would say no. But they being of honest heart do believe that the Bible should be taken literally when possible. Thou shall not kill would be a great example.
1. If a man commits a murder, that man must be killed.
Only when they have oil, and that's been going on since WWI.
A blog post does not a fact make.www.newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2015/04/30/not-news-obama-admin-admits-tax-exempt-status-non-complying-churches
You seriously dont see it!
I my original claim was that this happened but I later said I will need to recheck. So I admitted that I may be wrong.
But what I have linked to has the Obama administration saying that this will be an issue.
And all faith based institutions will be in jeopardy.