slashbinslashbash
Golden Member
- Feb 29, 2004
- 1,945
- 8
- 81
That would be a real coup for the operator if true. It's certainly possible, the DOGE block reward is determined by the hash of the previous block in the chain, so it is absolutely predictable before mining starts on a block.
It certainly could explain some of the very odd behavior shown by the middlecoin pool, where it would mine DOGE for 1 block, then go and mine something else for 30 seconds, then go back to DOGE.
That said, given the very lackadasical attitude of the middlecoin developer over the last few months, I don't know if it's something that he'd spotted and taken advantage of.
Well, it's quite clear that somebody/bodies with command of considerable hashrate was taking advantage of it. I posted a link to a Reddit thread about it a couple days ago.
http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost.php?p=36066026&postcount=10348
The guy had done a considerable amount of research, and commenters in the thread added more info. They found that all the big DOGE pools had an average block reward of around 460k instead of 500k, IIRC. And this is over something like a month-long period, so not just a small sample size, so for it not to be very close to 500k is highly suspect.
Also, network hashrates were higher on the high-paying blocks (or at least, block generation times were below 60s on the high-paying blocks, and over 60s for the low-paying blocks). So clearly some decent proportion of the DOGE hashrate (5-10%?) was taking advantage by only mining DOGE while the big blocks were active.