Silverforce11
Lifer
- Feb 19, 2009
- 10,457
- 10
- 76
Is this sarcasm? Or is it really like this in your country? I have never ever heard anyone make a claim that solar and wind energies are bad for the environment, so I assume this is some kind of joke?
But ideally, for your rigs at home, you could use a solar array on your roof to power your mining rigs, and literally pull free BTC right out of thin air (well, pulling them from the sunlight).
"Clean" energy sounds good, especially if its "energy from the sunlight or wind!!"... sounds great to people who have no idea. Big dig a bit further and it turns out completely opposite. The energy input to make solar cells is so great (refining all those rare-earth minerals) that in most countries, a typical rooftop panel never make enough energy to repay its original input cost over its short 20 years lifespan.
Wind is more viable in that sense, but its intermittent nature (same for solar) means it absolutely has to be backed up with rapid generators that cover the slack when the wind doesn't blow, or else there's massive blackouts and damage to the grid. Guess what that backup is? Gas generators, rapid on off of power on demand. So for each unit of wind power you install, you need an equal unit of backup gas generation. Wind power, expensive and inefficient use of land, not to mention damaging to wildlife and people nearby.
Hybrid cars are the worse. The battery pack is full of refined rare-earth (lithium is quite rare and its harvest is highly toxic to the environment) that needs to be replaced every ~8 years. Over its lifetime, it doesn't even justify the energy input and toxicity to the environment than the petrol it saves your car from using. But here, government gives a $8,000 tax rebate for a new hybrid car purchase! At the expense of other tax payers and businesses. Damn scam.
These poor policies are why I'm having to pay 29 cents a kWh. The price went up 50% over a few years.