bkiserx7
Golden Member
- Jan 14, 2007
- 1,338
- 28
- 101
move along... nothing to see here !
This guy saw the future and didn't share the info
move along... nothing to see here !
Sounds like a good idea, but I'm not sure I'd want to leave a bunch of coins on any site really.
Anyone see that bter.com is now offering interest for crypto deposits? Hmmmmm.... considering I'm just sitting on my coins waiting for the prices to jump.... why not?
1. historically, sites that hold your coins tend to lose them / embezzle them
2. you are basically handing control over your coins to the chinese government.
You are reaching paranoid conspiracy levels here.
Historically, there have been how many sites that have lost/embezzled out of how many that haven't?
Here is the updated listDear reader,
This thread has been superseded by a newer thread due to character size restrictions. A copy is left here for archival purposes; however, this copy is significantly out-of-date.
0.46% of entities, 6.6% of all coins in circulation (as of march 2014).
Just the first result on my search rather than anything exhaustive.
Also... I looked at the site you listed. that is 9542 entities that ACCEPT BITCOIN AS PAYMENT.
Accepting bitcoin as payment has nothing to do with holding your bitcoins for you.
Your argument is akin to saying that banks are secure because even though all major banks got hacked, if you count banks as 1 entity each and every company that accepts credit cards as one entity, you would find that the total percent of entities hacked is less than 1%. well no kidding.
out of those 9542 entities on spendbitcoins.com, only 37 entities offer financial services (and not all of those include online wallets).
PS. the list I found has the following blurb at the top
Here is the updated list
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=576337
Regardless, its up to you whether you want to actually secure your coins or not.
No skin off my back of you choose not to secure your coins properly.
What would prevent an online wallet from stealing your coins?
I wrote an scrypt kernel that is over 10% faster on gcn http://sterlingdesktops.com/pub/lsoc/
Funny thing is it's way too little way too late and nobody cares :/
I'm certainly not saying it's not wise to manage your currencies yourself. I just think it's an overreaction to summarily state that all services out there are going to embezzle or lose your coins.
Historically =! Y is going to happen1. historically, sites that hold your coins tend to lose them / embezzle them
I tested it on my 290 VaporX, and my hashing went from 790 Kh/s to 850 Kh/s. (with 14.6 beta, stock speeds and 18 Intensity)
That's an increase of about 7.5% on gcn 1.1.
Very good Job!
Thanks, you're the first person to test it other than myself
I've mostly performance tuned/targeted my 7850 and 7870.
It's slower on my 6670 and llano APU, but that had to happen
It took me several revisions to get that few extra %, I essentially rewrote the entire kernel (not just editing a line or two like most).
do you think you can do some magic for x11 or x13?.. i'd be interested in testing it if you can... that's where all my gpus are at, i only have my asics (gridseed) on scrypt now.
Newegg started accepting BTC.
Yeah that would definitely be nice. Geforce cards seem to be amazing at X11/X13. They seem to be using the card resources more efficiently. AMD cards have seen some speedup recently for X11/X13 but still not near what Geforce cards can get.
You are reaching paranoid conspiracy levels here.
Historically, there have been how many sites that have lost/embezzled out of how many that haven't?
I'm having a weird problem. I have 3 290s mining right now with all connected to the same pool and with the same settings. However, one of my cards has a hashrate that is ~30% lower. Powertune settings are the same, clocks, mem, intensity, etc are ALL the same.
I am mining X13 right now but I had the same problem with scrypt.
Anyone know what could be going on?