- Nov 14, 2003
- 9,811
- 110
- 106
I'm not laughing. Class act.
I mean pyramid schemes don't end well. And that is basically what this is.
It's not a pyramid scheme. That term has a strict definition and it's pretty obvious that BTC doesn't follow it. You are not paying a fee to "join", you are not paying directly to people who recruited you, you are not given any false expectation of 10X return on your money. Well, some people get that impression, but it's not guaranteed by anyone anywhere.
The early adopters, who people are so jealous of because they have 50,000+ bitcoins, were basically mining away for bitcoins when they were completely worthless. It was a bit of a risk for them to invest in something worth nothing. Then at some point, BTC reached $1. Again those early adopters took a risk in either keeping or cashing out. Free money is nice, but is it a good idea to cash out at $1, or wait and see if it goes higher? Continue on to today, and those same people are still asking that question. $16/BTC sounds like a lot if you have 50k of them and you got them nearly for free, but what if you cash out and they reach $100 in 6 months?
While it's claimed that the system gives the early adopters "free money", ultimatly tthey must continually risk that "free money". Each day they don't cash out they could lose what they gained if the market turns around. This is a bit different from a pyramid scheme.
TBH though, I'd almost prefer if it collapses somewhat. I'd give me a chance to buy in some more at the ground level. See, unlike a pyramid scheme, BTC are not going anywhere. Value might drop out, but unless everyone quits using them they will remain around. If the "scam" collapses and value gets reduced, it might just encourage them to be used for the intended purpose, and value will build back up naturally over time.