I accuse you of being a bald faced liar who trolls people. This makes you entirely unreliable as a source for anything. Is that clear enough or do I have to repeat myself for the tenth time?
You accuse me of lying about my computer hardware. Let me refresh your memory.
You said this:
What crock of shit. Two 580s and a 2600k overclocked will eat this game for breakfast. Anyone who implies otherwise is either on serious drugs or needs to be on serious drugs.
And I can easily prove you wrong. You do not know what you are talking about. I have repeated this a number of times, to you, and you have failed every single time to face the fact that you are wrong. In order to try to undermine my fact, you say that I'm lying about my hardware. When I offer to prove that I own the hardware in question, you say that I'll either be using Photoshop (I'm laughing) or a friend's computer to lie about it.
Your accusation (without proof) does not make me an unreliable source for information. You have to prove that I'm lying, to do so. You fail at this, of course, but that's not new in this thread (your repeated failures, that is).
I've already set strict criteria. I've already asked you to show one single thread where I claimed Crysis 2 was a crappy game. Instead you've continued to obfuscate, insinuate, ramble, and flat out lie.
One single thread? How about a post:
Exactly. Crysis never had great gameplay or even a good story line. The story is little better then a horror movie where monsters just start coming out of the woodwork and the game play is little better then Doom where you just shoot everything in sight. They've completely ruined the immersion for PC gamers by turning it into a shooter on rails and consolizing it to death. Now the graphics and immersion are just as bad as the game play and story line.
So, you say that the story is not good. You said that the game play is not good. You said that the immersion is 'completely ruined for PC gamers' because it's a 'shooter on rails' & it is 'consolized to death'. Now, in addition to this, the graphics and immersion are as bad as the [game play and story line] <- which, as you can see, you said at the start of that post weren't very good.
Now, show me where I lied? Or, have you changed your mind, and suddenly Crysis 2 isn't a bad game? Or are you going to wiggle out over the difference between 'bad' and 'crappy'? (This is me laughing).
Why should I answer a single thing you've written when you make flat out lies about anything I say and refuse to back them up?
Because I haven't lied, because most of my posts do contain argumentation and proof while yours merely contain accusations (such as whether or not my mother breast fed me or not, that was a relevant one to this thread!).
Yeah, and you are obviously getting so much out of our "conversation".
This is more like a tutorial. I teach, and you either learn or (so far), don't. That's up to you. But my purpose in this thread is to stop your continual spew of garbage.
Why should I care what others think? I'm not on stage like you. I don't want applause and don't care about criticism. Like I said, this is a STUPID bulletin board about a STUPID game. Give me one good reason to care.
What does 'whether or not you care about x' have to do with the truth value of x? Hint: Nothing. You might not care about the way you are perceived, but you might want to note that nobody else in this thread has called me a liar. I'm trying to show you that your perception is flawed, because you are so desperate to be the antagonist, to bring attention onto yourself, and to make it about you at every turn.
Don't go out of your way for my sake. Like I said, I don't care.
You should care about opening your mouth and stating X, and then needing to scurry away (tail tucked appropriately) when an easy contradiction to your X is presented.
Climb on that pedestal! Puff that chest out! Be the MAN! (snore)
Your e-persona is similarly boring, but I'm aware that my posts get under your skin and it is well deserved. Your only purpose in this thread is to shit on the game, as evidenced by the quote of yours I supplied in this post. Now, if you don't care, why don't you run along and allow (so graciously) the conversation in this thread to return to a discussion of graphical improvements, requirements, DX11 implications and motivations and so forth, instead of crapping up this thread with your bullshit?
Kind regards,
Aristotelian.