We're hitting on something here. In doing something that's against the law, you are by definition doing something wrong.
You can try to justify it in whatever way you want to make it seem better to you, but it's still breaking the law.
Just because something is illegal, doesn't make it wrong.
"In doing something that's against the law, you are by definition doing something wrong".
That's actually incorrect, and not the definition. It's a bad perspective to have.
Wasn't it at one point illegal for women to vote? Do you still think it's wrong for women to vote? What made it any less 'right' when it was illegal?
Unless you are trying to say that if something is illegal, it is wrong to break the law, even if the illegal thing being done is only 'wrong' BECAUSE it is illegal.
Let's take driving 65 in a 55mph zone. Is driving 65 on that road wrong? Probably not, especially if it is a highway. It would be 'wrong' to break the law that says driving 65mph in that zone, but it's breaking the law that's wrong, not what you are doing that is causing you to break the law.
Example? If it's wrong to drive 65 in a 55, what happens when the raise the speed limit to 65? It now becomes legal. It doesn't make it any more or less right, just legal.
Law NOT EQUAL moral