Dallas officer enters apartment she mistakes for her own, fatally shoots man inside

Page 26 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Josephus312

Senior member
Aug 10, 2018
586
172
71
Also, for those that think I'm a troll, what do you think of this guy lol.

You're a pedantic moron who loves semantics and derails threads using that skill. I'd say you're on the scale.

FIVR is quite clearly either a child or a "special" adult. Could also be a Russian, it's hard to distinguish between a Russian and an American "special" adult.
 

realibrad

Lifer
Oct 18, 2013
12,337
898
126
You're a pedantic moron who loves semantics and derails threads using that skill. I'd say you're on the scale.

FIVR is quite clearly either a child or a "special" adult. Could also be a Russian, it's hard to distinguish between a Russian and an American "special" adult.

Oh, and you figured this out in the 4 posts of mine to you, also interesting.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
36,289
28,144
136
It's not that I disagree with anything you're saying, it's that I believe that we need to draw a line in the sand. If Guyger gets away here without any criminal punishment, then that sets a precedent that says that any law enforcement officer, at any time, for any reason, can just walk into any one of our homes and kill any one of us.
That's not alarmism or hyperbole. Jean was in own home, doing nothing wrong, when an off-duty LEO unlawfully entered his home and killed him.
That she might get away with that freaks the fuck out of me. And I'm so white even other white people call me white. This is not okay.
If that happens the city will burn to the ground. It will be the first time I didn't object to that reaction.
 

Viper1j

Diamond Member
Jul 31, 2018
4,195
3,699
136
We get so many in this forum who claim "just behave and you have nothing to worry about". Ok guys where so we go from here?

Do we need to arm ourselves to be safe from police? If Jean had been armed, shot and killed her first what would be said about him? He would NOT get the benefit of self defense.

Can you even begin to imagine what would happen if a black man shot a cop and used "I fired because I was in fear for my life and the life of my family.." as a defense?
 

Sunburn74

Diamond Member
Oct 5, 2009
5,034
2,613
136
I still don't understand how it's justified to just blow a guy away on sight just because you think he shouldn't be in a certain place.
 
Feb 4, 2009
34,703
15,951
136
I still don't understand how it's justified to just blow a guy away on sight just because you think he shouldn't be in a certain place.

I know, what area of life could you be the cause of someone’s death and the reason be I worked a long day? Could someone fall asleep while driving and use the same reason, would anyone defend that person for doing it?
I realize this isn’t her legal defense but the whole situation is really odd.
 

Darwin333

Lifer
Dec 11, 2006
19,946
2,329
126
That fits with what I said. Police have a us vs them mentality. The them are seen as the dangerous/violent masses while they are the arbiters of justice. That never ends well.

Ironically they have been getting all butthurt when we adopt the very same "us against them" mentality, something the black community has done for quite a long time. Then they have the nerve to blame them for not cooperating with their police overlords.
 

realibrad

Lifer
Oct 18, 2013
12,337
898
126
Ironically they have been getting all butthurt when we adopt the very same "us against them" mentality, something the black community has done for quite a long time. Then they have the nerve to blame them for not cooperating with their police overlords.

There is also the issue that Police are trained and citizens are not. So even when people think they are being reasonable Police do not and they overreact.
 

Darwin333

Lifer
Dec 11, 2006
19,946
2,329
126
The reason they are protecting her, is because of the us vs them mentality. Cops do risk their safety and so its reasonable for them to be somewhat guarded. The problem is that what most in dangers cops is not having control of situations. The solution they found was from the military. The military picked up its methods in war, and that is very different situation than what police face. Further, we have a gun culture so any violence has the probability of becoming lethal in ways that other societies do not have. So, when a cop goes into a situation, the first thing they try to do is establish order through their authority.

The problem is that because this is not war, and they are servants of the people they are trying to serve, their military tactics cause other problems that the military does not often if ever have to deal with. Civilians are not combatants. Combatants are people that are looking to kill you any moment they see an opening, so soldiers on the battlefield need to use force to establish ultimate control. Police are not on a battlefield, but, they are also not as safe as the main populace.

My roofers have a far more dangerous job in almost all aspects but definitely, and provably, in deaths. See my own personal story, read at least the first two. one, two, three

So should my roofers be able to put civilians in a lot more danger in order to provide themselves with a tiny bit more safety? You mentioned the guy that was killed for grabbing his shorts. He was shot in a crowded hotel with an AR-15, the cops had to wake people up in like 12 rooms to make sure that none of the bullets went through the floor and hit them which was a definite possibility. So not only did they gun down the poor innocent sobbing guy who was literally begging for his life but they also endangered a bunch of other people that had zero to do with the situation just for a tiny bit more perceived safety. In reality they had 4 guys with long guns pointed at him and another two with pistols, when you look at the situation as a whole there is no way they should have killed him and endangered the other civilians. That wasn't an isolated incident of them putting innocent people not people in danger, sometimes severely injuring them, for a tiny bit of perceived safety. Like throwing a flashbang into a baby's crib trying to arrest one guy that wasn't even there and iirc didn't live there at all instead of going in normal or better yet just staking the place out until he leaves. There are countless other cases of them firing long guns or shotgun slugs with no regard for the safety of innocent people.

In one case the police shot at a guy they mistakingly believed had a gun, they didn't hit the guy at all but did hit two female bystanders. In another they shot at a guy who did have a gun and wound up shooting 9 innocent bystanders. To add insult to injury the city doesn't cover their medical bills and they can't even sue to get reimbursed in those situations. How fucked up is that cop shoots at a guy they shouldn't even be shooting at, completely miss said guy, shoot two innocent people instead and then said innocent people get stuck with the very expensive hospital bill.
 
Reactions: Josephus312

Darwin333

Lifer
Dec 11, 2006
19,946
2,329
126
There is also the issue that Police are trained and citizens are not. So even when people think they are being reasonable Police do not and they overreact.

I couldn't agree more. A shitton of times you see officers escalating the fuck out of a situation which then ends up "requiring" the use of force instead of first trying to deescalate the situation. Ironically this also puts the officers in more danger too.
 

Darwin333

Lifer
Dec 11, 2006
19,946
2,329
126
I sit on the side that believes its currently manslaughter. I also see some things that could point to this being more, but, I will hold off until I get more details. But, I think there is a fantastic case for manslaughter which should give more than enough of an alarm to other cops. Further, I also want to have justice for what has been done so far, such as letting her clean up and move.

The problem is that the cops aren't even looking to see if those details exist or not. Even worse is they have allowed her to cleanse a shit ton of potentially damning evidence including moving out of her apartment before it was searched, not sure if it would have mattered or not given all of the time she continues to have to continue to cleanse. But now there is zero chance that anything will be found from her apartment. To date, we can find all kinds of search warrants issued for this case but none of them have been for anything remotely related to evidence that would up the charge.
 

Darwin333

Lifer
Dec 11, 2006
19,946
2,329
126
There is also the issue that Police are trained and citizens are not. So even when people think they are being reasonable Police do not and they overreact.

Which goes more toward the point that I, and I'm pretty sure you, are trying to make. They are the supposedly trained professionals on the scene and more often than not they appear, at least initially, to be the unreasonable ones. They can take a calm encounter and ratchet that shit from a 3 to a 10 in two minutes.
 

realibrad

Lifer
Oct 18, 2013
12,337
898
126
Which goes more toward the point that I, and I'm pretty sure you, are trying to make. They are the supposedly trained professionals on the scene and more often than not they appear, at least initially, to be the unreasonable ones. They can take a calm encounter and ratchet that shit from a 3 to a 10 in two minutes.

That is part of it, but not the most important. They are trained in a military style that directs extreme force to establish compliance. In war, anyone that does not follow commands is a likely threat. For police, they are trained to believe the same. So a drunk guy crying on all fours is an equal threat as a combatant on the battlefield. Police are going to have far more solo interactions and so the risk increases for an overreaction.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
The problem is that the cops aren't even looking to see if those details exist or not. Even worse is they have allowed her to cleanse a shit ton of potentially damning evidence including moving out of her apartment before it was searched, not sure if it would have mattered or not given all of the time she continues to have to continue to cleanse. But now there is zero chance that anything will be found from her apartment. To date, we can find all kinds of search warrants issued for this case but none of them have been for anything remotely related to evidence that would up the charge.

That's ridiculous. What kind of damning evidence would you suggest existed in her apt? You have a conspiracy theory working, or what? Of course she moved. Staying there would just invite more trouble than she already has, which is plenty.
 

Josephus312

Senior member
Aug 10, 2018
586
172
71
The problem is that the cops aren't even looking to see if those details exist or not. Even worse is they have allowed her to cleanse a shit ton of potentially damning evidence including moving out of her apartment before it was searched, not sure if it would have mattered or not given all of the time she continues to have to continue to cleanse. But now there is zero chance that anything will be found from her apartment. To date, we can find all kinds of search warrants issued for this case but none of them have been for anything remotely related to evidence that would up the charge.

Pretty sure that as according to witnesses she was banging on his door they should have taken her phone and computer to check if there was any communication rather than let her clean everything out.

But you know, she's a cop so she's above the law.
 

Darwin333

Lifer
Dec 11, 2006
19,946
2,329
126
That's ridiculous. What kind of damning evidence would you suggest existed in her apt? You have a conspiracy theory working, or what? Of course she moved. Staying there would just invite more trouble than she already has, which is plenty.

Proof that she had more of a relationship than she stated.

Do you believe for one millisecond that if the roles were reversed, he killed her in her apartment because of the same exact alleged accident, that his apartment wouldn't be tossed as soon as they could get a search warrant in front of a judge, even if they had to wake one up?

Edit: Also see above post about her computer.
 
Reactions: Josephus312

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Proof that she had more of a relationship than she stated.

Which is conspiracy theory.

Do you believe for one millisecond that if the roles were reversed, he killed her in her apartment because of the same exact alleged accident, that his apartment wouldn't be tossed as soon as they could get a search warrant in front of a judge, even if they had to wake one up?

Edit: Also see above post about her computer.

More conspiracy theory. Why does it have to be more than an unfortunate incident where she made a huge mistake? It seems pretty clear that's the way it was. It's the only thing that makes any sense at all. I strongly suspect she will ultimately face charges for manslaughter.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,415
14,307
136
Which is conspiracy theory.



More conspiracy theory. Why does it have to be more than an unfortunate incident where she made a huge mistake? It seems pretty clear that's the way it was. It's the only thing that makes any sense at all. I strongly suspect she will ultimately face charges for manslaughter.

Because even if it was some horrible unfortunate mistake, then she must face charges for manslaughter, and should be convicted if what we know is found to be true. Because that is undoubtedly what would happen to any one of the rest of us if we made the same mistake. To treat her otherwise is to place the police, even off duty, above the law.
And shouldn't that concern all of us? That an off-duty government employee could walk into any one of our homes and murder one of us and get away with it because hey, it was a mistake? And if that doesn't worry you, why not?
Is it because the circumstances of when the police are allowed to be held above the law seem to depend considerably upon the social status of the victim? I'm thinking so.
 
Reactions: DarthKyrie
Feb 4, 2009
34,703
15,951
136
Because even if it was some horrible unfortunate mistake, then she must face charges for manslaughter, and should be convicted if what we know is found to be true. Because that is undoubtedly what would happen to any one of the rest of us if we made the same mistake. To treat her otherwise is to place the police, even off duty, above the law.
And shouldn't that concern all of us? That an off-duty government employee could walk into any one of our homes and murder one of us and get away with it because hey, it was a mistake? And if that doesn't worry you, why not?
Is it because the circumstances of when the police are allowed to be held above the law seem to depend considerably upon the social status of the victim? I'm thinking so.

At bare minimum.
You or I could at least claim we are not professionals regarding identification and we’ve had no professional training in identifying who is a threat.
A Cop cannot make that claim, to me they have to be held to a higher standard, plus review my previous post here

http://www.portvapes.co.uk/?id=Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps&exid=thread...oots-man-inside.2553666/page-26#post-39582492
 
Reactions: Josephus312

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Because even if it was some horrible unfortunate mistake, then she must face charges for manslaughter, and should be convicted if what we know is found to be true. Because that is undoubtedly what would happen to any one of the rest of us if we made the same mistake. To treat her otherwise is to place the police, even off duty, above the law.
And shouldn't that concern all of us? That an off-duty government employee could walk into any one of our homes and murder one of us and get away with it because hey, it was a mistake? And if that doesn't worry you, why not?
Is it because the circumstances of when the police are allowed to be held above the law seem to depend considerably upon the social status of the victim? I'm thinking so.

As I said, a charge of manslaughter is obviously in order.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
36,289
28,144
136
Which is conspiracy theory.



More conspiracy theory. Why does it have to be more than an unfortunate incident where she made a huge mistake? It seems pretty clear that's the way it was. It's the only thing that makes any sense at all. I strongly suspect she will ultimately face charges for manslaughter.
You don't need a conspiracy theory just an awareness of history to know blacks are treated worse by the criminal justice system then whites
 
Reactions: DarthKyrie

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
You don't need a conspiracy theory just an awareness of history to know blacks are treated worse by the criminal justice system then whites
So what? The facts are indisputable in this case. She shot him dead in his own apartment. He was unarmed in his underwear. She will inevitably face charges.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
36,289
28,144
136
So what? The facts are indisputable in this case. She shot him dead in his own apartment. He was unarmed in his underwear. She will inevitably face charges.
Meaning if the cop was black he would have been arrested and his apartment searched before he could scrub it.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |