So because we let cops get away with all sorts of misdeeds, we should let this one also slide?
I don't disagree, but one could nevertheless wonder, as a point of intellectual interest, why this one came out differently to all the others?
Could it be because the victim was particularly, visibly, 'respectable' and the media and police couldn't find a way to smear them as somehow 'deserving it?
Or because it set racist feelings against the strong culture of one's home being a protected space? Those two beliefs could counter each other within the same people.
Or just random chance - someone has to occasionally get justice in such cases, I guess.
I know it was all thrashed out at length in the first part of this thread, but everything about the behaviour of the police officer still seems utterly strange to me. I still don't understand how she could have mistaken the apartment, nor why her first instinct was to shoot, nor why she seemed incapable of grasping what she had done (going on about worrying about losing her job, as if that was the most important thing after killing a man). Nobody suggested she was drunk, right? Just tired? Just seems to me you'd have to be completely 'out of it' to behave the way she did. I'm still kind of baffled by the whole thing.