Are you? Anti-democracy political beliefs are to be shunned whenever possible.
Nazis weren't dealt with in WWII. They were fully dealt with during the postwar years when the horrors they caused were looked at and the true believers were carefully excised from the body politic because they were
fundamentally incompatible with functioning democracy and a free society.
Because the education system had been so thoroughly co-opted (as in by a certain point, you needed NSDAP membership or you lost your teaching job, same as professionals in a great many other fields), they only had enough people with firm anti-fascist credentials (as in the people who straight up got sacked and possibly imprisoned rather than yield to the Nazis) to administer schools, with the idea that they'd supervise the rest, who were selected because as best as could be told they joined the NSDAP and taught their curriculum because they had to, not because they were true believers.
The judiciary was even worse, just because it was chock full of alte komeraden, and there weren't enough people or a similar structure to have firm supervision from anyone with really strong pro-democracy credentials. However, they were the judiciary, and were given a legal code that worked well enough.
The particular beauty of Denazification as a historical example is that it was actually done
twice. We can compare and contrast. The East and the West did it. In the West, the government was largely a continuation of what had gone before as far as outward form. The East was a communist government designed by guys with utterly unimpeachable anti-Nazi credentials. In fact, a lot of the ground work was done inside a concentration camp. However, a government for a functioning state is a lot more than a handful of guys at the top. So they quietly did much the same thing as happened in the West.
However, the next step only happened in the West. In the East, criticism of the bureaucracy was brushed off because it was criticism of the government and those guys up top had flawless records. In the West it got to the point where they had a major youth movement in the 60s (if you want more info you can look up the 68er-Bewegung). Among other things, the upshot of the movement included a serious backlash against right wing figures in politics who had held positions under the Nazi government. When presented with a contrast between the pretense of their society to being better than the crimes of their parents and to being an anti-fascist democratic society and what their country actually was, they acknowledged it and took action. As a result, if you look at a map of German support for neo-Nazism, you can quite literally see the East/West border.
Support for attacks on democracy itself are not compatible with a democratic society and if we don't want them to take root, they
must be shunned and defused whenever possible. Democracy is not negotiable, it is a prerequisite for negotiation.