moshquerade
No Lifer
- Nov 1, 2001
- 61,504
- 12
- 56
why did they have to call him "The" Batman? It sounded odd.
and who is going to play the Joker in the sequel?
and who is going to play the Joker in the sequel?
Originally posted by: moshquerade
and who is going to play the Joker in the sequel?
Originally posted by: wahoyaho
Wasn't Jim Carey the Joker?
Originally posted by: moshquerade
why did they have to call him "The" Batman? It sounded odd.
Originally posted by: Aikouka
Originally posted by: moshquerade
and who is going to play the Joker in the sequel?
He'll probably be safely locked away in Arkham for awhile .
I actually rewatched the original Batman the other day and I have to say... ignoring the obviously bad 80s special effects, Dark Knight is deeeeefinitely a better movie. Of course, I'm probably biased since I cannot, for the life of me, stand the Vicky Vale character in the movie with how she fucking screams at least once every damn minute. I also didn't find myself a huge fan of Nicholson's Joker.
Originally posted by: Kaido
Just got back from the movie. We had a tough crowd...we were among the 3-4 people who laughed at the funny parts in the beginning. It was so silent, I actually stopped laughing because it felt so awkward I think people were too scared or shocked. That and I sat next to two giggling teenage girls who kept taking pictures of the screen with their cell phones and texting people :|
I think Heath Ledger did an amazing job. You can usually "see" the actor beneath the character...I couldn't tell it was Ledger at ALL. He did an amazing job...he really came across as psychotic.
What was up with the MUSIC? There was ZERO pulse-pounding music during the big car chase scene...it felt slow and orchestrated...TOO slow! I also felt there were a couple weak plot points...number one, Harvey Dent flipped to the dark side too easily. The Joker's logic didn't convince me. Number two, Morgan Freeman quit too easily. Who wouldn't sift through a million people's phone surveillance systems to save hundreds of lives? He just kinda...quits. That's a pretty lame line in the sand, imo. I think they had a difficult time because the editing was probably a bit rushed and they couldn't shoot new Joker scenes without Heath. And yeah, Batman's voice was waaaay too deep sometimes. And his mask looked stupid. It made his face look wide and was too round...I liked the last movie's mask, more angles and sharper instead of smooth.
The bat bike was awesome! I also like the Joker's logic...you clearly saw how his plans worked, but the fun part was seeing how different characters would react to the situations they were put into.
Originally posted by: zerocool84
I finally saw this movie and I'm sorry to say it is WAAAAAY over hyped. People got my hopes up way too much. The first hour and a half was great but then it dragged after that. The movie dwelled on two-face for much too long. They should have ended it when to-face killed those people and set up for the next movie. Heath Ledger was good in the movie but not Oscar good. I'm sure that other people could have played it. It was a good movie but not as good as everybody played it out to be.
They did start to show him lose his cool after he thought Gordon had died. Even though he never would have gone over the edge because his coin wasn't yet scarred, he did resort to the lowered tactics...Originally posted by: Kaido
I also felt there were a couple weak plot points...number one, Harvey Dent flipped to the dark side too easily.
The Joker isn't supposed to be logical, perhaps that's why you state you like it...The Joker's logic didn't convince me.
I also like the Joker's logic...
Quit too easily? To quit he had to be on board with the idea in the first place, which he never was. This can go pretty deep into morality debate, but Fox (Freeman) simply had his principals...just like Batman won't ever take justice into his own hands and purposefully take a life, Fox was unwilling to use the power save for the one special instance.Number two, Morgan Freeman quit too easily. Who wouldn't sift through a million people's phone surveillance systems to save hundreds of lives? He just kinda...quits. That's a pretty lame line in the sand, imo.
Filming was completely finished with (at least any scenes with the joker) long before Heath died...I think they had a difficult time because the editing was probably a bit rushed and they couldn't shoot new Joker scenes without Heath.
Sacrificing form for function - this batsuit was the very first one of any of the films that actually allowed him to turn his head independent of his torso...And his mask looked stupid. It made his face look wide and was too round...I liked the last movie's mask, more angles and sharper instead of smooth.
Originally posted by: jiffer
...
I've been wondering. When the Joker visited Harvey in the hospital room, the Joker gave his gun to Harvey and even pointed it at his own head. He was going to LET Harvey kill him. When Harvey indicated that he would let the coin flip determine the Joker's fate, the Joker said, "That's more like it!" Obviously, the coin toss was in the Joker's favor, so Harvey didn't shoot him. But I wonder, if the coin toss had not been in the Joker's favor, would he have stopped Harvey from shooting him, or was he crazy enough to accept the coin toss? If he was really that crazy...that's REALLY crazy.
...
Originally posted by: jiffer
I assume that after the coin toss decided that the Joker would live, Harvey was finished with the Joker and had no more plans for revenge. He moved on to his next victims to see what fate the coin would decide for them. Or is there any reason to think that he would have gone back after the Joker later?
Originally posted by: Dirigible
Originally posted by: jiffer
...
I've been wondering. When the Joker visited Harvey in the hospital room, the Joker gave his gun to Harvey and even pointed it at his own head. He was going to LET Harvey kill him. When Harvey indicated that he would let the coin flip determine the Joker's fate, the Joker said, "That's more like it!" Obviously, the coin toss was in the Joker's favor, so Harvey didn't shoot him. But I wonder, if the coin toss had not been in the Joker's favor, would he have stopped Harvey from shooting him, or was he crazy enough to accept the coin toss? If he was really that crazy...that's REALLY crazy.
...
With regards to this question, yes I believe the Joker would've let Harvey kill him. When Batman was bearing down on the Joker on his motorcycle, the Joker kept saying, "Come on, do it," or something like that, indicating he wanted to Batman to kill him by running him over with the motorcycle. So I do believe the Joker had some desire to be killed, at least at times.
Joker wasn't exactly suicidal, he wanted Batman to break his rule and hit him (thus more than likely killing him). He didn't necessarily want to beat Batman, he just wanted to break him...he wanted to do the same with Harvey, although I get the feeling he could have easily used a a trick gun in case Harvey actually did pull the trigger...of course I don't think we'll ever really know for sure, but its probably best to take that scene at face value.
Originally posted by: Kaido
Just got back from the movie. We had a tough crowd...we were among the 3-4 people who laughed at the funny parts in the beginning. It was so silent, I actually stopped laughing because it felt so awkward I think people were too scared or shocked. That and I sat next to two giggling teenage girls who kept taking pictures of the screen with their cell phones and texting people :|
I think Heath Ledger did an amazing job. You can usually "see" the actor beneath the character...I couldn't tell it was Ledger at ALL. He did an amazing job...he really came across as psychotic.
What was up with the MUSIC? There was ZERO pulse-pounding music during the big car chase scene...it felt slow and orchestrated...TOO slow! I also felt there were a couple weak plot points...number one, Harvey Dent flipped to the dark side too easily. The Joker's logic didn't convince me. Number two, Morgan Freeman quit too easily. Who wouldn't sift through a million people's phone surveillance systems to save hundreds of lives? He just kinda...quits. That's a pretty lame line in the sand, imo. I think they had a difficult time because the editing was probably a bit rushed and they couldn't shoot new Joker scenes without Heath. And yeah, Batman's voice was waaaay too deep sometimes. And his mask looked stupid. It made his face look wide and was too round...I liked the last movie's mask, more angles and sharper instead of smooth.
The bat bike was awesome! I also like the Joker's logic...you clearly saw how his plans worked, but the fun part was seeing how different characters would react to the situations they were put into.
Originally posted by: Queasy
Originally posted by: moshquerade
why did they have to call him "The" Batman? It sounded odd.
He's called that in the comics too.