Dark Souls 3 leak - May not come on PC

[Cloudfire777]

Here is the leak with a ton of new details and screenshot. It looks soooo gooood

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dyRJ5u-L8qw


But the leaker said the game may not make it to PC. They say its negotiable whatever that means?
Please rally up and make a petition if this turns out true. I love the Dark Souls Series and would hate it become a new DS1 with years before we get it on PC.


Screenshots

 

[Artorias]

I don't understand FROM Software, they are owned by Kadokawa Dwangowith/Kadokawa Corporation who have an estimated $16 billion in assets.

Why the hell do they need to sell out to Sony? Can they not get funding from their owner? The Souls franchise is a huge money maker for them, why not have it on all platforms.

Edit: I see it may be console exclusive, which would be mind boggling since DS2 was a good port. Still doesn't excuse them from making Bloodborne an exclusive.

 

[PieIsAwesome]

omg

 

[master_shake_]

good.

charging 12 bucks for directx 11 is kinda pathetic.

 

[smackababy]

Don't mind it being console only. I prefer playing on console because there are no cheaters.

 

[thehotsung8701A]

I buy their games at $5 or less. I would never support developers that treat PC gamers like poo.

 

[TheSlamma]

Man I hope not, I have so many lag locations in Bloodborne.

PS4/Xbone just doesn't have the power for these types of games, the load times are also horrid. They patched it and it's still terrible.

 

[futurefields]

Man I hope not, I have so many lag locations in Bloodborne.

PS4/Xbone just doesn't have the power for these types of games, the load times are also horrid. They patched it and it's still terrible.

Hhaha the don't care about the game quality, just as long as it is on the consoles and people are buying it

 

[Cloudfire777]

They made a ton of money on Dark Souls games for PC. I don`t think they can leave out PC, not even Sony can afford to pay that much money to keep it for themselves.

Still not sure what "up for negotiating" means in this context?

But im so hyped for this game. Love Dark Souls. Here`s to hoping for a Feb/March launch

 

[cmdrdredd]

I don't understand FROM Software, they are owned by Kadokawa Dwangowith/Kadokawa Corporation who have an estimated $16 billion in assets.

Why the hell do they need to sell out to Sony? Can they not get funding from their owner? The Souls franchise is a huge money maker for them, why not have it on all platforms.

Edit: I see it may be console exclusive, which would be mind boggling since DS2 was a good port. Still doesn't excuse them from making Bloodborne an exclusive.

Cause before the game launches, sony writes a fat check. So they don't have to sell any copies yet and already make money. Microsoft has done that too.

 

[cmdrdredd]

Don't mind it being console only. I prefer playing on console because there are no cheaters.

This is why I played the first one on PC with a trainer available to me, no griefers(I just put god mode on and ignore them when they invade) and no need to disconnect from the internet to play lol.

Wasn't my cup of tea anyhow.

 

[cmdrdredd]

Man I hope not, I have so many lag locations in Bloodborne.

PS4/Xbone just doesn't have the power for these types of games, the load times are also horrid. They patched it and it's still terrible.

Load times have nothing to do with power and everything to do with a 5400rpm HDD on a SATA-II(3Gbps) interface.

 

[JujuFish]

Load times have nothing to do with power and everything to do with a 5400rpm HDD on a SATA-II(3Gbps) interface.

SATA II has nothing to do with it.

 

[cmdrdredd]

SATA II has nothing to do with it.

Yes it does, it's a slow interface with a slow drive with some OS overhead likely as well. It's not the system's "power". The CPU and GPU aren't the reason for load times.

 

[JujuFish]

Yes it does, it's a slow interface with a slow drive with some OS overhead likely as well. It's not the system's "power". The CPU and GPU aren't the reason for load times.

SATA II has more throughput than any consumer level HDD uses. That's not a "slow" interface.

 

[smackababy]

This is why I played the first one on PC with a trainer available to me, no griefers(I just put god mode on and ignore them when they invade) and no need to disconnect from the internet to play lol.

Wasn't my cup of tea anyhow.

I always just got to a place I could kick them off a ledge from. That was always fun.

 

[cmdrdredd]

I always just got to a place I could kick them off a ledge from. That was always fun.

Heh yeah. Whatever makes you happy. I just couldn't be bothered.

 

[ImpulsE69]

I liked the first game for what it was, and put some time into it, but lost interest after GFWL lost my save. Never bothered with the 2nd one.

 

[TheSlamma]

Load times have nothing to do with power and everything to do with a 5400rpm HDD on a SATA-II(3Gbps) interface.

Umm yeah, the I/O is part of the "power" of the console.

Also please actually read the WHOLE post this time, Man I hope not, I have so many lag locations in Bloodborne.

Also I put a 256GB SSD in my PS4 and Bloodbornes load times still suck hard, they are less worse but don't compare to DS2 on my PC. That AMD setup they have isn't at all impressive.

 

[cmdrdredd]

Umm yeah, the I/O is part of the "power" of the console.

Also please actually read the WHOLE post this time, Man I hope not, I have so many lag locations in Bloodborne.

Also I put a 256GB SSD in my PS4 and Bloodbornes load times still suck hard, they are less worse but don't compare to DS2 on my PC. That AMD setup they have isn't at all impressive.

It is not the cpu or the gpu that causes any of that.

I was commenting on load times, not the fps drops. Some if not all of the fps drops is because of developers going too far beyond what is playable on the console. It can be rendered but it's not fast enough.