368 cameras used to create that 1.8 gigapixel camera that can see an image down to 6''. :hmm:
And 90% of ATOT rejoices as their penors are safe from the eye in the sky.
368 cameras used to create that 1.8 gigapixel camera that can see an image down to 6''. :hmm:
Unfortunately mine would be highly visible. ^_^And 90% of ATOT rejoices as their penors are safe from the eye in the sky.
Knock Knock who's there? Man in black coming to get you:biggrin:So, the "supposed" hard drive shortage after the floods in Thailand was really the Feds buying up huge amounts of hard drives to store downblouse photos.
Why stop at drones. You line of thought obvious would ante up over time to police and news helicopters, then small planes and airliners. Where do you draw the line in shooting something down that ain't yours?I'm interested in seeing anti drone tech from hobbyists. I fully support shooting those fuckers out of the sky, and that needs to happen. Something fast with a mounted .22 would probably do it.
Oooh, nabbed me another lurker.very cool
I'm interested in seeing anti drone tech from hobbyists. I fully support shooting those fuckers out of the sky, and that needs to happen. Something fast with a mounted .22 would probably do it.
Why stop at drones. You line of thought obvious would ante up over time to police and news helicopters, then small planes and airliners. Where do you draw the line in shooting something down that ain't yours?
As for the storage, didn't some agency just build a huge data center? Was it the NSA? Probably for this.
I believe that's to monitor and record communications (phone calls, internet traffic, etc). I could actually see logging the worlds porn habits taking a million terabytes of data per day, but no way does recording some video take that much.
Anyone feel like running the numbers? I'd take a phone video, multiply it by the number of sensors they said they used(16 was it?), double that figure, then multiply that by whatever time frame you want; x MB per hour, or whatever.
I'm sure it would be way off, but it would give a feasible ballpark figure for what it would take.
The high end would be 20GB/hour x 368 sensors x 24 hours = 176TB/day (44 4TB HDD's plus overhead and parity).
This just made me think of this scenario:...
They probably don't track every single person, but rather randomly pick and choose. Guessing they'll use these to catch speeders too.
This just made me think of this scenario:
A military drone chasing a Google self-driving car. I guess only one of them has missiles though. Right now, anyway.