Oh, I fully agree that Comey's decision was justice; Mrs. Clinton received the exact same free pass as did the Republicans. But voting inherently involves a value judgment; we have to vet a person's character, capabilities, and intentions. My issue is when he describes her as "Pure as the driven snow." I have no problem with anyone voting for Clinton as the lesser evil, just as I have no problem with anyone voting for Trump. No one is required to share my own priorities and values; we're all free individuals with our own unique priorities. But "Pure as the driven snow" implies that he has honestly evaluated her character and found her to be exemplary. That is simply not believable. There is no possible way that anyone can honestly evaluate Hillary as being anything other than completely dishonest and untrustworthy.
It's a damned sad day in America when "Nothing that could be reasonably prosecuted was found" causes us to embrace a candidate. Sure, she's extremely careless and we have uncovered "evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information" (Comey's statement) but she isn't bad enough to prosecute. Yay! And if we're going to redefine evidence of crimes but not enough to prosecute as "Pure as the driven snow", then we might as well just start auctioning off the Presidency. After all, lots of organized crime bosses fit that exact same description.