- Oct 3, 2013
- 1,292
- 56
- 91
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...-dc-ban-on-gun-carry-rights-unconstitutional/
A good ruling. Still, it will take years; between appeals and the district setting up the permit process before this decision is fully manifested.A federal judge in the District of Columbia on Saturday overturned the citys total ban on residents being allowed to carry firearms outside their home in a landmark decision for gun-rights activists.
Judge Frederick Scullin Jr. wrote in his ruling in Palmer v. District of Columbia that the right to bear arms extends outside the home, therefore gun-control laws in the nations capital are unconstitutional.
Click here to read the decision.
We won, Alan Gura, the lead attorney for the Second Amendment
Foundation, told Fox News in a phone interview. Im very pleased with the decision that the city cant forbid the exercise of a fundamental constitutional right."
Gura said he expects the District to appeal this decision but added, Well be happy to keep the fight going.
The decision leaves no gray area in gun-carrying rights.
Judge Scullin extensively referenced the Supreme Court decisions in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) and McDonald v. Chicago (2010) to concluding there is no longer any basis on which this court can conclude that the District of Columbia's total ban on the public carrying of ready-to-use handguns outside the home is constitutional under any level of scrutiny.
The court ordered the city to now allow residents from the District and other states to carry weapon within its boundaries.