Originally posted by: dpopiz
mmmm I dunno. I think 1910 sounds better. so nice and tiny, great screen, and windows.
how is the speed of linux on this thing? is it a lot snappier than wince?
This all from what I've read myself. Hardware wise, I think they're similar, except that the iPaq has only an SD slot while the Zaurus has both an SD/MMC and CF slot, as well as a CPU difference (Zaurus: Intel StrongArm 206mhz, iPaq: Intel XScale 200mhz). Software wise, the Zaurus is running Linux (with a Windows-y like KDE) while the iPaq has WinCE. The actual speeds, as far as I've read, are similar and not noticeably different. I kind of like the thought of being a non-Microsoft slave. Sure, I'll use Microsoft products when I have to, and sometimes because its better (or more likely, the best alternative). Though, the Zaurus seems kinda plug-and-playish and it has the multimedia power and software backing of independent developers; of course, it takes more work to find all the cool stuff for the Zaurus. For a computer geek like myself, nothing could be cooler! Ask yourself if you're willing to play around with the Zaurus a little bit or crave the mainstream, "sports-car" sexy, as one reviewer put it, of the iPaq. Actually, I think the Zaurus is SO cool that it is sexy! But that's for you to decide. Either way, you won't find an iPaq at this price (at least I, won't)