Sheik Yerbouti
Lifer
- Feb 16, 2005
- 14,035
- 5,338
- 136
Obama authorizes secret support for Syrian rebels
Hey Barrack Hussien Obama, could you please get our nose of out Syria?
We have no business there.
link to this claim?
Obama authorizes secret support for Syrian rebels
Hey Barrack Hussien Obama, could you please get our nose of out Syria?
We have no business there.
Love you man. Just plain love you. A total state collapse because of some refugees who make up less than 1% of the total European population.
Looky here looks like someone found the magic button to learn how to play the racist and/or religious discrimination card.
This is simply flat out untrue, especially when made as a general statement.traditional Europeans aren't reproducing Muslims are (at 6x the normal rate). Just admit how fucking ignorant you are and move along.
Lying does not help your case.With over 2/3rds of Muslims in the USA believing that anyone should be killed for blasphemy, and >50% supporting Sharia law as the law of the land (look at Dearborn Michigan), this only shows how out of touch with reality you are. Islam has no place in the modern Western world, full stop.
I dunno why anybody would want to argue with him. He is just a mentally ill zealot that plays the tired racist card everytime on anybody that disagrees with his out-of-reality worldview.
PC-obsessed, self-righteous lunatics like him are worse than ISIS scum, at the very least the latter is pretty honest about how they want you dead.
Yeah, so why is it that they don't attack China, or Brazil, or well, anything but western countries exactly? Never seen any of you Islamic extremist "experts" attempt to explain that one.
Lying does not help your case.
If you were simply relying on some online source for these indisputably wildly false claims, you need to be way more careful in the future.
More than half (51%) of U.S. Muslims polled also believe either that they should have the choice of American or shariah courts, or that they should have their own tribunals to apply shariah. Only 39% of those polled said that Muslims in the U.S. should be subject to American courts.
Lying does not help your case.
If you were simply relying on some online source for these indisputably wildly false claims, you need to be way more careful in the future.
Goddamnit. What kind of cookies are on my system after clicking that link.
My fault. Should have known.
allowing Muslim communities to grow and take root in your country can definitely expose you to terrorist attacks.
Only thing I want to hear out of Kerry's mouth is this line: "We will work with Russia to kill ISIS and to restore the states of Iraq and Syria." Because that's the proper way forward from this.
To end this situation you end ISIS holding territory.
This is simply flat out untrue, especially when made as a general statement.
In France the birth rate is over the replacement level.
http://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/en/fr...e-one-fact/article/2-01-the-average-number-of
Yeah, so why is it that they don't attack China, or Brazil, or well, anything but western countries exactly? Never seen any of you Islamic extremist "experts" attempt to explain that one.
That's idiotic. Why would we choose randomly? Iran has had it coming for a while, and this is our chance.
So in other words you have practically no judgement and believe in preposterous claims.Really?
https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy...uslims-shows-thousands-support-shariah-jihad/
You're incredibly naive, quit lying to yourself.
Number of Islamic terrorist attacks world wide from 1990-1999: 27
Number of Islamic terrorists attacks from 1/1/15 to 6/26/15: 47
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Islamist_terrorist_attacks
More Islamic terror attacks in the first 6 months of this year than in the entire decade of the 90's.
Attacks were done by ISIS.
Iran is fighting ISIS.
Why would we attack Iran over what happened in Paris?
Here is some more data on the general point.Interesting, you highlight France because it's apparently at the highest level at 2.01 children per woman, or in other words, 2.01 children per every 2 adults. Just barely scrapping the surface of "above replacement". But the article doesn't split the statistics up by demographics, only the country as a whole. And that's the point of the comment you responded to.