At least the video stopped before showing carnage and hopefully those identities shown escaped...
People, please state what any non-descript link concerns.
[EDIT] Thank you, norseamd
Last edited:
At least the video stopped before showing carnage and hopefully those identities shown escaped...
At least the video stopped before showing carnage and hopefully those identities shown escaped...
People, please state what any non-descript link concerns.
https://youtu.be/4yIlX5ZKHRUHey guys - I just want to say... that I DID MY PART in this. I changed my Facebook profile to be the colors of the French flag. WHAT HAVE YOU DONE?! NOTHING I BET!
How does it feel being a God-damned liar?Misrepresentation found:Uhhm, no, he most certainly missed nothing for what I wrote, as he directly quoted it in his own post.
In his responding post #360 he quoted exactly what I charged of an incitement for genocide against Muslims, made no mention of refuting that explicit assumption, and continued forth with a "need to be removed like the cancer they are...."
First he responds to YOUR assertion that he was talking about all Muslims and he directly refutes it...its not limited to Muslims, and no i do not hate them...
...then he begins talking about the clarified subject HE established without ever acknowledging or quoting your edit or his post....the affiliation of a group of people who threaten global peace does not matter they are all the same and need to be removed like the cancer they are
...and...?
It's word for word the exact same headline that he quoted: "Obama authorizes secret support for Syrian rebels." He didn't imply "...in response to current events in France." That came from your imagination (or I could say "inability to read").
Where did you or Zin get the idea that he was talking about anything more current? Have we stopped fighting ISIS? Did the arms we provided to the other rebels get returned to sender? I didn't get the memo.
FelixDeCat was clearly replying to Newell Steamer who was the first one to link it ITT. Because my post replying to you and Zin sat in my clipboard all day, I wasn't even the second to link to it (FelixDeCat). Like I said: you missed it earlier. It's kind of funny to see you two demand a link that was already provided from a person who was essentially responding to that link and then smugly act like no link would be coming, but it's even better when you get it twice more and STILL don't realize that it is exactly what he was talking about all along.
Ask Reuters. It's their headline.Oh, I see you responded to this claim already.
No, I didn't read the entire thread. I honestly can't hawk my way through this same type of asinine thread like we know that you do
Events like this, I tend to avoid such threads because it's the same useless bickering back and forth.
Felix has a history of bloviating about inane things and bullshit that he has conjured from within his own disturbed noggin. Such a claim without legitimacy, with such a history, generates a fair assumption from the rest of us.
And again, since you like to drag on petty semantic games endlessly: How, again, is something secret when it clearly isn't secret? :hmm:
You likely won't believe me when I say that I only read some 15% of these posts. To that: IDGAF.
Looks like they have a mole.Reuters said:WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama has signed a secret order authorizing U.S. support for rebels seeking to depose Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and his government, sources familiar with the matter said.
Meanwhile the dipshit Canuck is pulling out.
One thing that I thought was a bit odd was when ISIS admitted responsibility for the attacks. They referred to Paris as the 'capital of prostitution', yet ISIS were posting leaflets in territories they control regarding pricing for selling flesh into slavery.
I haven't read the entire thread btw so apologies if someone already broached this topic.
Nice job, you almost single-handily solved the entire problem of terrorism.Hey guys - I just want to say... that I DID MY PART in this. I changed my Facebook profile to be the colors of the French flag. WHAT HAVE YOU DONE?! NOTHING I BET!
According to CNN, the only attacker positively identified so far was a radicalized French national.
CNN has been a joke for years....almost as bad mas FOX....lol
Hey guys - I just want to say... that I DID MY PART in this. I changed my Facebook profile to be the colors of the French flag. WHAT HAVE YOU DONE?! NOTHING I BET!
I presume that because, for some esoteric reason, in their interpretation of Islam, it's not OK to voluntarily sell sexual favors, but forcing someone into it against their will is A-OK. If the person is a subhuman "infidel" of course.
Perhaps, but they were correct. Now it's 3 of the attackers who have been identified as French Nationals.
OMG - seriously?????????
Nice job, you almost single-handily solved the entire problem of terrorism.
One thing that I thought was a bit odd was when ISIS admitted responsibility for the attacks. They referred to Paris as the 'capital of prostitution', yet ISIS were posting leaflets in territories they control regarding pricing for selling flesh into slavery.
I haven't read the entire thread btw so apologies if someone already broached this topic.
Haven't read this thread but I see the fear narrative is being pushed quite successfully. Gotta get boots on the ground before ISIS kill my baby! This morning I heard that the terrists used encrypted texting apps to plan the attacks so we'll have to expand the Patriot Act of course. Then we'll finally be safe.
I heard McCain, Graham and some NY anti terrorist guy all say we need to bring back NSA "oversight" and we need tech companies to encrypt less stuff so we can prevent attacks like these. Kind of weird how these guys think to protect freedom we should give a bunch up.
Grating more power to the state is such a backwards concept that isnt based in reality. The Boston bombing happened while the NSA was spying away. This attack happened in a country that has less restrictions on invading personal privacy. Bottom line is even with all the spying these attacks are not thwarted. To give up more liberty for something that has proved itself ineffectual is insane.
I think the NY guy you are talking about is Peter King. While watching the news during the attacks. I knew that jackass was going to come on and tell the world how we need to expand the security state to protect our freedumbs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Still confused about the "secret" part. How is that secret--it was pretty well-documented at the time, no?
Pretty sure we were both under the impression that Felix was suggesting something that occurred in the last two days. Obviously, claiming something that was "secret" would preclude the ability to provide an actual source of the claim...which is the point of the challenge.
He quoted the headline, word for word, and responded to it. He didn't use "secret" to imply anything because it wasn't his word (it's Reuter's).Agree 100%, it may have not been directly said, but it was clearly implied that this 'secret' was a very recent announcement and related to the current horrific events in Paris.