Debt ceiling brawl threatens economy, consumers

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

manimal

Lifer
Mar 30, 2007
13,560
8
0
If the debt ceiling is something that should "not be messed with / played chicken with" why do we even have it? Whats the point of a ceiling if we raise it every time we reach it?
Why don't we just get rid of it?

Because we have a constitution
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,967
19
81
BTW, so I guess you are some rich fuck?

Do you know that right now your portion of the Federal debt is like $40k?

$40k may not mean much to you, but it is a year of my income.

So, at any time, someone can call my debt, and I am broke.

That's a big thing for me.

-John

IMHO you have settled into your value. Just based on your post count never going up and seeing 3+ responses from you shows you simply fail to understand how life works.

I seriously do not understand how you only have less than 3000 posts here.
 

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
Yeah, and you are heartless.

Each child born today is born into debt, and servitude.

Opportunity is being legislated out of the American Constitution, as we speak.

I'm more or less lucky, that I won't have to really pay back what I owe, but in the immortal words of "Back to the future, Part 3" "It's your kids!"

-John
 
Last edited:

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
Maybe that is what society wants... that every child be born into hardship.

If so, it worked when America had something to offer, but as we all know, America has little to offer today.

So, society needs to get off their ass and offer kids some hope, and not insurmountable debt.

-John
 

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
Or, you can continue spending kids into damnation.

The hell with them. You have yourself to think of.

-John
 

gdansk

Platinum Member
Feb 8, 2011
2,493
3,398
136
The hell with them. You have yourself to think of.

I don't think it'll be too long before most Americans do not have children. So, perhaps so.

Each child born today is born into debt, and servitude.
Hasn't this always been the case?

Opportunity is being legislated out of the American Constitution, as we speak.
What do you mean by opportunity? If you're referring to the ability to do anything than pay debts... then I don't think it is just the legislators behind it. There are many things the government does that destroys opportunity. Such as quantitative easing and other inflationary policies (in the sense that they maintain 3% inflation rather than allowing deflation).

Borrowing money is fine and normal, but when it is a nation borrowing money it can be a huge problem. Governments must pay that to someone, eventually. The government has to collect higher revenue to pay off the interest payments, or reduce spending. So essentially by borrowing now, we are reducing future useful spending by devoting a certain portion of our revenue toward interest payments. Now imagine we wanted to start paying off the debt we have, we'd have to substantially increase revenue, stop borrowing any more and decrease spending. It is a recipe for disaster if we continue to leverage assets that we do not have (ie future government revenue).
 

boomerang

Lifer
Jun 19, 2000
18,890
642
126
Brother, Can You Spare A Trillion?

Here's our pathological liar of a President telling us how he's going to cut the deficit in half. He still has time, I'll give him that.

Obama will cut deficit in half FEB 2009

Here's an article about our dipstick in chief telling us why his career was more important than the country.

Obama: I voted as a Senator to help my career, not the country

I think that it's important to understand the vantage point of a senator versus the vantage point of a ... president. When you're a senator, traditionally what's happened is, this is always a lousy vote. Nobody likes to be tagged as having increased the debt limit for the United States by a trillion dollars. ... As president, you start realizing: 'You know what? We -- we can't play around with this stuff. This is the full faith in credit of the United States.' And so that was just a example of a new senator, you know, making what is a political vote as opposed to doing what was important for the country.
 

manimal

Lifer
Mar 30, 2007
13,560
8
0
Only when a Democrat is in the Whitehouse

When Republicans are in control spending goes on without impunity
Its almost like there has been a platform switch again..


maybe both parties should be called the democratic republicans and the neocons and big government republicans can have the federalist party back...



btw I know that is a gross oversimplification but that seems about par for the course here lately..



btw



The debt ceiling would have to be raised multiple times if teh Ryan plan was installed today....even if we installed the medicare changes today not in 10 years the debt ceiling would have to be raised multiple times...
 

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,947
126
This thing is gonna get real stupid real fast. The world is rolling their eyes right now.
 

matt0611

Golden Member
Oct 22, 2010
1,879
0
0
Its almost like there has been a platform switch again..


maybe both parties should be called the democratic republicans and the neocons and big government republicans can have the federalist party back...



btw I know that is a gross oversimplification but that seems about par for the course here lately..



btw



The debt ceiling would have to be raised multiple times if teh Ryan plan was installed today....even if we installed the medicare changes today not in 10 years the debt ceiling would have to be raised multiple times...

I'm fine with raising the debt limit if we implement a plan that balances that budget within 5 to 6 years.
I think thats pretty reasonable to ask.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,839
49,548
136
I'm fine with raising the debt limit if we implement a plan that balances that budget within 5 to 6 years.
I think thats pretty reasonable to ask.

It's actually not. What you are asking is for people to give in to your policy demands or face an immediate global financial crisis.

That's not logical policymaking, it's hostage taking. Even the Republicans aren't this crazy or this woefully irresponsible. If the debt ceiling is not raised and the US defaults on its debt, each and every legislator who votes against raising it should be voted out of office for it due to gross negligence.
 

matt0611

Golden Member
Oct 22, 2010
1,879
0
0
It's actually not. What you are asking is for people to give in to your policy demands or face an immediate global financial crisis.

That's not logical policymaking, it's hostage taking. Even the Republicans aren't this crazy or this woefully irresponsible. If the debt ceiling is not raised and the US defaults on its debt, each and every legislator who votes against raising it should be voted out of office for it due to gross negligence.

You don't have to default on the debt if you don't raise the debt limit. Those are two separate things.

Asking for a plan to balance the budget is not unreasonable.
Are you saying if the government were to cut 1.6 trillion over 6 years that will cause a global financial crisis?
Thats bullshit and you know it. Thats like 250 billion / year, even less when revenues pick up. Give me a fucking break.

Either they don't increase the debt limit and they are forced to balance the budget right here and now, or you sign on to a plan that balances it in 5-6 years.
Thats what I want to do. Thats the only leverage they have against the spending.
 
Last edited:

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,839
49,548
136
You don't have to default on the debt if you don't raise the debt limit. Those are two separate things.

Asking for a plan to balance the budget is not unreasonable.
Are you saying if the government were to cut 1.6 trillion over 6 years that will cause a global financial crisis?
Thats bullshit and you know it. Thats like 250 billion / year, even less when revenues pick up. Give me a fucking break.

Either they don't increase the debt limit and they are forced to balance the budget right here and now, or you sign on to a plan that balances it in 5-6 years.
Thats what I want to do. Thats the only leverage they have against the spending.

I have no idea how you got that from what I posted. No, I'm saying that a failure to increase the debt limit would lead to US default, which will lead to a global financial crisis. And yes, failure to raise it will absolutely cause a default. There are large numbers of US statutes already enacted that would require the US to spend money, but that money could not be borrowed to cover those expenditures. That means we would have a situation where the government would be forced to act outside of its ability to borrow, and run out of money, aka: default.

It's not like the budget suddenly gets magically balanced if we don't raise the debt ceiling. So then you're probably thinking to yourself 'well congress could just pass new legislation getting rid of all those pesky programs that cause debt!'. Not only would that be a monumental undertaking to disentangle all those programs without causing a complete collapse of the US government, but from a practical standpoint I see no reason why that legislation would pass when a debt ceiling increase didn't.

What you are advocating is irresponsible ideological governance at its worst, luckily no political party is insane enough to actually do what you're advocating, so we'll be ok.
 

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,947
126
What you are advocating is irresponsible ideological governance at its worst, luckily no political party is insane enough to actually do what you're advocating, so we'll be ok.

Yeah. Thank god we dont have direct democracy. These fucking idiots would do shit and then be like "oh"
 

matt0611

Golden Member
Oct 22, 2010
1,879
0
0
I have no idea how you got that from what I posted. No, I'm saying that a failure to increase the debt limit would lead to US default, which will lead to a global financial crisis. And yes, failure to raise it will absolutely cause a default. There are large numbers of US statutes already enacted that would require the US to spend money, but that money could not be borrowed to cover those expenditures. That means we would have a situation where the government would be forced to act outside of its ability to borrow, and run out of money, aka: default.

It's not like the budget suddenly gets magically balanced if we don't raise the debt ceiling. So then you're probably thinking to yourself 'well congress could just pass new legislation getting rid of all those pesky programs that cause debt!'. Not only would that be a monumental undertaking to disentangle all those programs without causing a complete collapse of the US government, but from a practical standpoint I see no reason why that legislation would pass when a debt ceiling increase didn't.

What you are advocating is irresponsible ideological governance at its worst, luckily no political party is insane enough to actually do what you're advocating, so we'll be ok.

I know that will never happen, thats why you use that as leverage.

Theres plenty of things we can do to avoid defaulting anyway in the short term. Borrowing money from pensions, printing it, cutting government, etc

I advocate for fiscal sanity, 1.6 trillion deficits are irresponsible, and if the only way to stop them is to do this, so be it.

And yes, thank god that we have a republic, or this country would be in even worse shape than it is now.
 
Last edited:

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,839
49,548
136
I know that will never happen, thats why you use that as leverage.

Theres plenty of things we can do to avoid defaulting anyway in the short term. Borrowing money from pensions, printing it, cutting government, etc

I advocate for fiscal sanity, 1.6 trillion deficits are irresponsible, and if the only way to stop them is to do this, so be it.

And yes, thank god that we have a republic, or this country would be in even worse shape than it is now.

You want to use something with a probability of zero as leverage? That's pretty terrible leverage. There are things we can do to stave off default in the short term, Treasury says we can make it till about July.

If you are arguing for 'fiscal sanity' you are doing the exact opposite of it. What's funny is that if you want to use the threat of default and a global economic meltdown as leverage, you have to be willing to do it to make a credible threat. Even a credible threat will likely have dire effects on global financial markets at it undermines the credibility of US securities.

Argue for lower spending all you want, but this is the absolute most insanely stupid way to go about it. Once again, incredibly irresponsible. Those who want to do it are not fit to govern, because they are incompetent.
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,967
19
81
What needs to be done first is to prevent fund sharing at the government level. Too many people do not realize voting $5000 for the Spring Queen Event opens up that money to be grabbed by the Summer Beach Vacation Fund For GS13+

We should also require our government to at least run at 'break even' as a large paint brush and allow a 3-5 year 'loss window' for new upstarts just like in the private sector.

Sadly at the end of the day when profits are never expected it's easy to self-pay and give handouts.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |