- Dec 18, 2010
- 67
- 0
- 0
So, you're willing to pay an obscene premium for the latest and greatest but, you don't want to deal with s hot fix?
$280 or $380 for a VIDEO CARD, either way I'm playing in crazy territory.
So, you're willing to pay an obscene premium for the latest and greatest but, you don't want to deal with s hot fix?
Well, at least it will be different. I've been running ATI cards since the 9700 Pro.
I think you just had buyer's remorse, and was just looking for a excuse.
Whatever.
Maybe it's the numerous hotfixes. It's bad enough to have to install a new driver every month, but every week or more. Didn't a recent driver need 5 hotfixes.
Maybe it's the numerous hotfixes. It's bad enough to have to install a new driver every month, but every week or more. Didn't a recent driver need 5 hotfixes.
LOL - I ran the stock 10.4's for seven months, and only installed the 10.12's last week. Similar periods elapsed between driver installations when I ran a 8800 GTS.
There's a difference between needing a new driver and being OCD about it. Or spreading the fangirl FUD.
I think the driver issues are a valid point and no need to call out troll...Just look at the thread comparing driver releases....9.10>10.3>10.7!! Results were up and down like a whores draws!....95% of people who have experienced cards from both manufacturers acknowledge the nVidia out of the box support is better than AMD, the other 5% just wont admit it....LMAO!
$280 or $380 for a VIDEO CARD, either way I'm playing in crazy territory.
As for updating drivers, I don't even bother updating after every driver release. It's just not needed unless the drivers are fixing an issue with a game you're having or the drivers offer a general improvement over a wide range of games.
I wonder if the people who destroyed their cards with the 196.75 drivers feel Nvidia has the upper hand in driver quality?
I wonder if the people who destroyed their cards with the 196.75 drivers feel Nvidia has the upper hand in driver quality?
Yes but, you chose to pay it. Sounds more like buyers remorse.
Well, at least it will be different. I've been running ATI cards since the 9700 Pro.
how many people you think that is?, you would of thought people be screaming all over the net about it, however fact of the matter is, NV users dont update their drivers much, therefore not many bothered and those that did obviously caught the problem....and I didnt think every card was affected and also those that did got support\replacement?
Please put the bias hammer down for a minute read our posts and understand our position.
Join the community and state what will be better for "us" gamers.
Thanks.and be happy
reviews are really annoying because they can vary greatly from each other. its almost like some sites are testing a completely different card.How long did it take to find those numbers?
Anandtech shows a 21W difference under load between 570/6970 with Crysis and and 85W difference with Furmark, both in AMD's favor. Idle temps tied and under load with Crysis, AMD was 4 degrees cooler, Furmark load, 5 degrees cooler. Idle, noise was 0.4dB in Nvidia's favor, and under load 3.3dB in favor of AMD.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4061/amds-radeon-hd-6970-radeon-hd-6950/24
Both companies have their better and worse drivers. I just don't buy for a second that Nvidia has better 'out of the box support', or at least nothing I have seen points to one company being better than the other.
__________________
I agree, if you read my prior post, but what about divx gpu support and performance improvements. Why should "we" AMD card owners have to be afraid to update our drivers and have these advancements.
Thats not fair and is one of things that keeps AMD from being a supeirior gpu company at the moment.IMHO
Did you buy it after the 10.3 drivers? I think they were released in the beggining of April.previously had a 5850,