Deeko's 2014 NFL Predictions!

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,215
11
81
Hello everyone! It’s time for everyone’s favorite time of year – football season!

Is anyone else excited to actually be talking about the game again? Ever since one of the most wild, unexpected Superbowls I can remember, we quickly got lost talking about suspensions, sexual orientation, and where Johnny Football likes to party. Let’s put all that behind us and get back to what matters! X’s and O’s, W’s and L’s!

As usual, some disclaimers. I don’t profess to be an expert on the NFL, I do this for fun. I don’t do any game by game picks, just a rough guess on each team’s standing, so these exact records may not be possible with the 2014 schedule. While I do try to be objective, no one can completely put aside their personal bias.

NFC East

1. Philadelphia Eagles (9-7) – The Eagles have been anointed the kings of the East by default, as if Foles didn’t lose DeSean Jackson. They have a good chance of winning this division, only because the competition isn’t strong, but I don’t really see a lot of progression forward. Sproles is a nice change of pace, but he doesn’t replace DJax, and the defense still has questions.
2. Dallas Cowboys (9-7) – People are screaming “worst defense in history!” from the rooftops. Let’s settle down now. Yes, it was stupid to get rid of Ware, but more important, the fossil of Monte Kiffen is no longer calling the shots, which is a plus. The offense will be potent, the offensive line is strong, but will they finally learn to run the ball? Probably not. Actually utilizing Murray is what determines if this team takes the division or not.
3. Washington Redskins (7-9) – I like the Redskins on offense. Griffin should improve from last season, but I don’t think the defense will be strong enough to lift them too far.
4. New York Giants (5-11) – You have to assume Manning will be better than last year, but I don’t think that will matter. The rest of the team won’t improve with him.

NFC West

1. Seattle Seahawks (11-5) – Sooner or later, Marshawn Lynch is going to slow down, and when he does…they’ll still be a very good team on defense with a stadium designed to punish visitors. I do think the Seahawks will struggle to put up points, but the defense is strong enough that that might not matter.
2. San Francisco 49ers (10-6) – Did you see that tip out of Crabtree’s hands? That might have been the window closing on this team. Ok..that might be a bit dramatic, but they’re aging in key places, half the team is hurt or suspended, and Kaepernick is woefully overpaid. Not good signs.
3. Arizona Cardinals (8-8) – The Cardinals are in a tough spot. This division has inexplicably gone from the toilet to the throne, so it’s not a matter of being good…you have to be great, and I just don’t really think they Cardinals and Carson Palmer are great anymore.
4. St Louis Rams (4-12) – Take a mediocre team in a strong division. Then have your top two offseason stories be a practice squad player that ended up getting cut, and your starting QB getting injured. Not a good sign.

NFC North

1. Green Bay Packers (12-4) – Aaron Rodgers healthy is all you really need to say. If Lacy can build on what he did last year, their offense is very good, and I’ve always been a big fan of Julius Peppers – we’ll see how much he has left in the tank.
2. Chicago Bears (10-6) – The Bears might have one of the best offenses in their history – which they’ll need, because the defense doesn’t live up to historical expectations.
3. Detroit Lions (8-8) – Calvin Johnson is enough to win the Lions some games, but it won’t be enough to get them into the playoffs. Golden Tate is overrated.
4. Minnesota Vikings (5-11) – Like Mike Zimmer, but the QB situation is going to keep the Vikings from mattering. Peterson can’t do it all, and losing Jared Allen won’t be addition by subtraction on defense.

NFC South

1. New Orleans Saints (10-6) – This will be an interesting season. Brees lost some of his weapons, so we’ll see if new ones can fill the void. My vote says yes. Rob Ryan remains one of the most underrated coaches in the league and will keep the defense improving, if not stellar.
2. Atlanta Falcons (8-8) – It’s not so much that I think they did a lot in the offseason to turn things around – I just don’t think they were as bad as their 2013 record would suggest. Ryan/Jones/White is still a nice combo on offense, but the defense leaves something to be desired.
3. Carolina Panthers (8-8) – The inverse of what I said about the Falcons…it’s not that I think they got THAT much worse, I just don’t think they were as good as they looked last year. Losing Steve Smith leaves a leadership and experience void, although the defense does still remain strong.
4. Tampa Bay Buccaneers (4-12) – Apparently it’s a thing in the NFC to dump your best defensive player…just ask Dallas and Minnesota. It won’t help here. They added some pieces, but they’ll still struggle.

AFC East

1. New England Patriots (13-3) – A return to the Patriots of old? I’m not sure the offense will be as potent as its been, but they made some big moves to strengthen the defense. I see a big comeback year for Revis.
2. Miami Dolphins (8-8) – Moreno is a nice pickup, but I’m not sure it’s going to be enough to push the Dolphins over the hump. Not with the Patriots loading up on defense.
3. Buffalo Bills (8-8) – The defense was better than they got credit for last year, and Watkins should help Manuel’s progression along here. Not a playoff team or anything, but better than they’ve been.
4. New York Jets (6-10) – I mean….Chris Johnson? Meh. Decker with Geno Smith instead of Peyton Manning? I don’t see it.

AFC West

1. Denver Broncos (12-4) – Still hard to really fathom what happened in the Superbowl. Even the most diehard Seahawks fans didn’t see that one coming. That said, the Broncos aren’t licking their wounds, they appears to be gearing up for another shot. Despite losing some players, I think the Broncos got better on defense, and Peyton certainly showed no signs of age last season. Still the class of the AFC.
2. San Diego Chargers (10-6) – Some people are saying it was a mirage for Phillip Rivers to look so strong last season. Personally, I think the mirage was the weak season or two he had prior. The Chargers will still be respectable, but they didn’t do enough to challenge the Broncos.
3. Kansas City Chiefs (7-9) – There’s part of me that enjoyed seeing Andy Reid succeed…in no small part due to my feelings about the Eagles. That said, they tapered off at the end of the season, and I don’t really think they’ll see that same spark again.
4. Oakland Raiders (3-13) – They added a lot of players, but most of them are past their prime. The Raiders will still be the Raiders.

AFC North

1. Cincinnati Bengals (10-6) – Not sure anything happened to make them worse, but can’t see a reason for them to be much better, either. The AFC North isn’t as strong as it once was, so that might be enough.
2. Pittsburgh Steelers (9-7) – Question marks for this team. They typically draft smart on defense, and they’ll need their picks to make a difference in a hurry. Roethlisberger should lean heavily on Blount and Bell, which may wear down opposing defenses enough to keep them in the hunt.
3. Cleveland Browns (7-9) – I feel bad for Cleveland. They made some nice signing, Johnny Manziel should fit great here….and then the suspensions come crashing in. It’s a lot easier to develop into an NFL QB when you’re throwing to Josh Gordon. The Browns are headed in the right direction – but this won’t be the year.
4. Baltimore Ravens (6-10) – Ray Rice is washed up, Joe Flacco is overpaid, and the defense is a hollow shell of its former self.

AFC South

1. Houston Texans (9-7) – Last year was a fluke. They’ll bounce back this year, the defense is terrifying in the front, and just about anything is better than Matt Schaub. Whether or not they can dethrone the Colts depends on what the running game can do to support their QBs.
2. Indianapolis Colts (8-8) – It’s not that I don’t like the Colts - I do – but statistics eventually have to catch up to their aptly-named signal caller. They can’t keep winning that many close games…it just doesn’t happen in the NFL.
3. Jacksonville Jaguars (7-9) – The Jags finished last season almost respectably ( by their standards ), and I did like what they did in the draft. They won’t scare too many teams, but they’re headed in the right direction.
4. Tennessee Titans (4-12) – Wisenhunt has a great track record, but I don’t think Jake Locker has what it takes, and there really isn’t much else worth talking about with this team.

Playoffs

Wildcard Round
Bears (5) @ Eagles (4)
49ers (6) @ Saints (3)
Steelers (6) @ Bengals (3)
Chargers (5) @ Texans (4)

Divisional Round
Bears (5) @ Packers (1)
Saints (3) @ Seahawks (2)
Chargers (5) @ Patriots (1)
Bengals (3) @ Broncos (2)

Championship Round
Saints (3) @ Packers (1)
Broncos (2) @ Patriots (1)

Superbowl
Denver over Packers

ARE YOU READY FOR SOME FOOTBALL????

Previous years:
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
 
Last edited:

pete6032

Diamond Member
Dec 3, 2010
7,580
3,126
136
Not so sure about those AFC South predictions.

How can the Texans, who have massive QB issues, finish in better shape than the Vikings? Even if we say Ryan Fitzpatrick = Matt Cassel then I'd still pick the Vikings to finish with a better record.
 
Last edited:

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,215
11
81
Man I'd love to see that Superbowl.

Yea, really, that whole Championship weekend + Superbowl would be awesome...QB nirvana

49ers wont make it to the playoffs

I wouldn't be surprised if that were the case.

Not so sure about those AFC South predictions.

How can the Texans, who have massive QB issues, finish in better shape than the Vikings? Even if we say Ryan Fitzpatrick = Matt Cassel then I'd still pick the Vikings to finish with a better record.

You can definitely make the case against them winning the division; originally I had the Colts winning, but decided the Texans would be my "worst to first" team. That said, vs the Vikings? There's plenty of reasons for the Texans to beat them. The Texans' defense is much, much better than the Vikings, and the Vikings play in a much harder division. Really, the only thing the Vikings have over the Texans is starting running back.

That said, considering they're not even in the same conference, let alone the same division, it seems like an odd comparison to make, and unless you're a Vikings fan that isn't happy with how low I have them, I'm not sure why you'd bring it up.
 

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,215
11
81
Sorry but Manning isn't beating NE in NE in Jan.

In the AFC Championship game, Manning won the last two games (2013 and 2006), with Brady winning in 2003. Granted, historically, the home team has won playoff games between those two, the last time Brady beat Manning in a playoff game was 2004 - and he had a much better defense in 2004, while Manning's was much worse.

It's by no means a sure thing, but it's silly to dismiss it on principle, too.
 

Capt Caveman

Lifer
Jan 30, 2005
34,547
651
126
In the AFC Championship game, Manning won the last two games (2013 and 2006), with Brady winning in 2003. Granted, historically, the home team has won playoff games between those two, the last time Brady beat Manning in a playoff game was 2004 - and he had a much better defense in 2004, while Manning's was much worse.

It's by no means a sure thing, but it's silly to dismiss it on principle, too.

So, the home team always wins and we already know how Manning plays in cold. NE win if they're the first seed with home field advantage.
 

rudder

Lifer
Nov 9, 2000
19,441
86
91
AFC South


4. Tennessee Titans (4-12) – Wisenhunt has a great track record, but I don’t think Jake Locker has what it takes, and there really isn’t much else worth talking about with this team.

How dare you talk smack about my team!!!! They will be 6-10 dipwad.
 

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,215
11
81
So, the home team always wins and we already know how Manning plays in cold. NE win if they're the first seed with home field advantage.

"Always has won" != "Always wins". The Patriots won at home in 2003 and 2004, the Colts won at home in 2006 and the Broncos won at home in 2013. You really can't say "Brady beat Manning in a cold weather playoff game 11 years ago when he was on a different team, therefore he'll do it again this year".

Besides, it's a team game....if Demarcus Ware is in Brady's face all night, it really won't matter what Manning does. I think, as a whole, the Denver team would win that game - not that I think Manning would outplay Brady.

Anyway, it's 4+ months away and the game might not even happen, so this early in the game, it's not really worth debating any more than that. You think the Patriots would win, I think the Broncos would. We'll see what happens if it comes to it.
 

Ban Bot

Senior member
Jun 1, 2010
796
1
76
Nice read, good effort, and it takes some guts to put out picks in the preseason i.e. before a ton of injuries, shooting stars, and burned out vets set the stage to clear the smoke of pretenders and contenders. I was quite concerned seeing your Seattle pick--the Hawks getting rolled out by the Saints and bowing out of the playoffs with a win. I felt a little better knowing you picked Seattle as a 6th seed last year and getting thumped out of the wild card round by Dallas

My worthless prediction is: Seattle will lead the league in rushing. Their OL, for all their pass blacking issues, is starting the season healthy and has some good road graters. The Lynch-Wilson-Harvin trifecta is going to hurt a lot of teams. If teams focus on Lynch Seattle pull out the read option with Wilson. And if teams think they got that down Seattle can kill defenders on the edge with Harvin on Jet Sweeps, reverses, end arrounds, and various screens. The backup runners, especially Michael, are good as well. (EDIT: stacking 8 in the box is now a big mistake). My other prediction is how "under the radar" Seattle's youth has been. This is Wilson's 3rd year (26 iirc). Harvin is 26. They have a lot of young players playing for contracts this year or next:

Defense: LB: Wright, Wagner, Smith, Irvin; DB: Maxwell, Lane; DL: Avril.
Offense: QB: Wilson; WR: Kearse; TE: Miller; RB: Lynch, Turbin; OL: Carpenter, Okung, Sweezy

Most of these players are very young (less than 26) and are hungry for their first contract. Others, like Avril, are studs looking for a big pay day. Others like Lynch and Miller aren't quite over the hill (both 28) and would like another round at the rodeo.

I think people are going to be very surprised at how much Wilson has matured. Ditto players like Bobby Wagner. I think Seattle is going to struggle some (slot and right corner; pass rush at times; pass protection) and probably loses more games than last year (harder schedule) but I also think they are so young that a lot of their returning players are going to be a lot better because they are going into year 3 and 4. Seattle isn't an old team fighting father time. Seattle is a very young squad where the players are getting better and hungry for pay days. Oh, and I think Harvin has a chip on his shoulder because he didn't get to contribute much last year.

Ps- I posted this about the 49ers yesterday. Yes, my only comments are on the Hawks and 9ers--as if any other teams really mattered

While I am a Seahawk homer I enjoy the Seattle-San Francisco rivalry. Unfortunately, my "bold" pre-season prediction is San Francisco is going to be scrambling just to make the playoffs.

On the defensive side of the ball the Bowman injury hurts (piss off to the Seattle fan who threw popcorn on him--get well soon Navarro!) which is compounded by Aldon Smith being out 9 games. And now there is the Ray McDonald mess. Dorsey is hurt (maybe out all season?) and Ian Williams is coming back off a bad break. In general the shallow 49er defensive rotation has put a lot of wear and tear on their superlative unit. These are big red flags. It doesn't help that their defensive secondary has no cohesion as all four starters from 2 years ago are gone.

On the flip side of the ball I see similar issues. The running back rotation is shot with James injured, Hunter out for the season, and Lattimore perpetually injured. So SF has an aging Frank Gore and a rook in Hyde. Reports are Ipatti is coming back a little slow from his injury and Boone was out all pre-season. And while the additions to the WR core are nice I am not sold on Colin Kaepernick... yet. Where I see progression with Luck and Wilson I see Kaepernick and RGIII struggling. I like the mobile QBs are they can turn dead plays into first downs and it makes defenses play more honest. But at some point you must protect yourself (RGIIIs problem) and sometimes you need to win the battle as a QB, not a runner (something I think they both have issues with). I think he struggles reading defenses and I haven't seen him do some of the things Wilson has (e.g. in the Saint's playoff game on 3rd&3 in the 4th Wilson goes deep against the blitz and hit Baldwin for the key first down to seal the game; or the savvy to draw the 49ers offsides in the championship game and then make a spectacular through to Kearse for the touchdown.) Wilson is still developing but the little I saw of the 49er preseason--which was ugly IMO--don't think the 49er offense has matured much.

The fact is after 3 straight visits to the NFC title game and an aging roster at some point the 49ers will drop off. Sadly, these things tend to surprise people and also be precipitous.

The good news for the 49ers is the Rams offense is a mess with Bradford done and the Cardinals defense has had to weather big losses, big enough I don't think their defense can make up for all of Palmer's prescribed error quota.

EDIT: My second useless prediction is Seattle repeats
 
Last edited:

Mermaidman

Diamond Member
Sep 4, 2003
7,987
93
91
Just want to point out that, once again, you don't have any teams with fewer than 3 losses, or fewer than 3 wins.
 

Capt Caveman

Lifer
Jan 30, 2005
34,547
651
126
"Always has won" != "Always wins". The Patriots won at home in 2003 and 2004, the Colts won at home in 2006 and the Broncos won at home in 2013. You really can't say "Brady beat Manning in a cold weather playoff game 11 years ago when he was on a different team, therefore he'll do it again this year".

Besides, it's a team game....if Demarcus Ware is in Brady's face all night, it really won't matter what Manning does. I think, as a whole, the Denver team would win that game - not that I think Manning would outplay Brady.

Anyway, it's 4+ months away and the game might not even happen, so this early in the game, it's not really worth debating any more than that. You think the Patriots would win, I think the Broncos would. We'll see what happens if it comes to it.

And Manning's record when it's below 40F? Below 30? Jan in NE is not toasty. With Ware's declining performance over the last couple of years and NE's line able to handle smaller sized rushers(like Von Miller). I don't think Brady is going to be worried about a pass rush. Brady losing his weapons over the course of the season due to injury is something I'd worry about more.

And I predict NE will have a better defense than Denver this year.
 

MetalMat

Diamond Member
Jun 14, 2004
9,692
36
91
Saints are finishing 11-5, Browns at 4 wins. And can I say I was waiting BIG TIME for Deeko's predicitions
 
Last edited:

rockyct

Diamond Member
Jun 23, 2001
6,656
32
91
Don't care, still going with Chiefs taking the AFC West by force.

I don't really see that happening. The Broncos are losing some players for the first part of the season due to suspensions, but I can't see them regressing too much unless Wes Welker tanks after he serves his suspension. I also am oddly optimistic about the Chargers this season. I think things have clicked for them in the offseason.
 

Pocatello

Diamond Member
Oct 11, 1999
9,754
2
76
Great work on the prediction. I do enjoy reading it every year. I'm sure there will be a lot of surprises, just like every year. Maybe except for the Cowboys, they've been consistently 8-8 for as long as I could remember, which is quite a feat and baffling.
 

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,215
11
81
Great work on the prediction. I do enjoy reading it every year. I'm sure there will be a lot of surprises, just like every year. Maybe except for the Cowboys, they've been consistently 8-8 for as long as I could remember, which is quite a feat and baffling.

Yea....I don't know why I even gave them 9 wins, we should all know by now that as long as Garrett is at the helm they're going 8-8.

Just want to point out that, once again, you don't have any teams with fewer than 3 losses, or fewer than 3 wins.

Gotta do what you've gotta do. It takes a special lack of luck to fall below 3-13, and that's a line I guess I just can't call.
 

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,403
8,199
126
I've got the same SB matchup as you and also thinking Peyton pulls out a win to polish his legacy. Just like Ray Lewis's farewell tour.

I also think this is the year that Dallas wins a playoff game.
 

IndyColtsFan

Lifer
Sep 22, 2007
33,656
687
126

The article focuses too much on Luck and not the rest of the team. Yes, obviously Luck played a HUGE role in those comebacks but the rest of the team helps too. If anything last year, the coaching staff handcuffed Luck too much and if they had let him loose, I believe they would've won one or two more games. Luck is a great QB but you can't keep handcuffing him and forcing the issue with the run when you're only getting 2 ypa from Richardson.

At any rate, I don't think the front office is doing enough to build the Colts into a SB contender. Their OL isn't getting the help it needs and the defense is still questionable. I don't believe this team could win any other division besides the AFC South with the possible exception of the NFC East.
 

Zargon

Lifer
Nov 3, 2009
12,240
2
76
I cant see any errors in your NFC North Predictions, though I will say the bears are due for a playoff win over the pack......at least I hope so.

the bears D looks terrible outside of the dline
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |