Deeko's 2014 NFL Predictions!

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,403
8,199
126
based on what? yeah they have Lacy and Nelson, and nothing else on offense of note, and no safeties(just like the bears)

Umm...Randal Cobb?

As far as safties go...how can you go wrong with a guy named Ha Ha?
 

Jimzz

Diamond Member
Oct 23, 2012
4,399
190
106
I'd swap the Cowboys and Redskins but honestly, both teams will go as their QB goes and there are some question marks about them. However with the Dallas D being possibly the worst in the league again, I don't think the boys can hope to keep winning shootouts all year.

I didn't see them in the pre-season but how did Romo and RG3 look? Does Romo look back from his back surgery? Did RG3 look 100%?

RG3 looked fine on his leg, but the new coach wants him to be more a pocket passer so he's trying a new throwing motion and not moving as much. Not sure how that will work out.
 

rudeguy

Lifer
Dec 27, 2001
47,371
14
61
RG3 looked fine on his leg, but the new coach wants him to be more a pocket passer so he's trying a new throwing motion and not moving as much. Not sure how that will work out.

It will work out the same as every other time: He will start out trying to do what the coach wants. When he feels pressure, he will go with his instincts. RG3 is good, I'm a big fan. But he's not a pocket passer.
 

Phoenix86

Lifer
May 21, 2003
14,643
9
81
Yea....I don't know why I even gave them 9 wins, we should all know by now that as long as Garrett is at the helm they're going 8-8.
Dallas is going to be very lucky to hit 8-8. Offense hasn't really improved much, it's better, but not like they added some major power to it. Defense, somehow, seems worse than worst in the league. How do you go down from there?!

You mentioned running, I think we will have a successful running game, but I don't think they will stick to it. Maybe for fear of Romo's back...
 
Last edited:

dawheat

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2000
3,132
93
91
I think you are still underestimating the impact Desean had on the offense, and I fully agree with the earlier poster that preseason stats are largely meaningless. They added some role players on defense, sure, but let's not forget just how bad their defense looked at times last year... Role players alone don't turn that into an elite unit.

Jenkins is a pretty big upgrade at safety for the Eagles and Allen seems to be a solid player. I don't think their secondary is going to be good, but it shouldn't be the huge problem it was last year. Run defense was solid, though not spectacular. I feel pretty confident in the Eagles having a league-average defense in 2014.

The Cowboys in retrospect have gone backwards from the league worst defense last year, especially in the first part of the season. I do think it's going to be as brutal as people are predicting. 8-8 would be a blessing for them, even though they have a relatively easy schedule.
 

KLin

Lifer
Feb 29, 2000
29,501
126
106
Deeko, you are such a damn idiot. Everyone knows the 49ers are going 19-0 this year.
 

-slash-

Senior member
Jan 21, 2014
361
1
41
Seahawks will not lose to the Saints, especially not with the Saints offense this year. No way no how. Niners wont make the playoffs. RG3 will be out with an injury by mid season and the skins will flutter. Broncos will be thumped a few times this year and the "greatest offense ever" will show the superbowl was no fluke. Pack wont make it to the SB, lost too much on the offense to remain reliable.
 

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,215
11
81

Maybe I'll do a pick em league and see how I do against Cortana week by week - that said, I would hope a computer algorithm, written by intelligent software engineers, unencumbered by personal bias, with near limitless processing power would be able to predict football better than me.


Seahawks will not lose to the Saints, especially not with the Saints offense this year. No way no how. Niners wont make the playoffs. RG3 will be out with an injury by mid season and the skins will flutter. Broncos will be thumped a few times this year and the "greatest offense ever" will show the superbowl was no fluke. Pack wont make it to the SB, lost too much on the offense to remain reliable.

Naturally you think the Seahawks will go nowhere but up, right?
 
Last edited:

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,215
11
81
Dallas will be at the bottom of the NFC east.

The Cowboys in retrospect have gone backwards from the league worst defense last year, especially in the first part of the season. I do think it's going to be as brutal as people are predicting. 8-8 would be a blessing for them, even though they have a relatively easy schedule.

Dallas is going to be very lucky to hit 8-8. Offense hasn't really improved much, it's better, but not like they added some major power to it. Defense, somehow, seems worse than worst in the league. How do you go down from there?!

You mentioned running, I think if we have a successful running game, but I don't think they will stick to it. Maybe for fear of Romo's back...

So let's talk about the Cowboys. The offense was very good last year. They were 5th in the league in points scored, and the only starter they lost was dead-weight-Miles-Austin (who I actually do like and hope he has success elsewhere). The offensive line is young, talented, and added another 1st round pick. There's no reason to believe they won't put up a ton of points again this year, which everyone seems to be overlooking. 8 of the top 10 scoring teams last season made the playoffs, and the two that missed (Dallas and Chicago) just barely missed, so let's not act like that's irrelevant.

On to the defense. The defense isn't going to be good, let's get that out of the way. Cutting Ware was stupid. However, they didn't really have him last year, either. He technically played in 13 games, but he played injured through most of those. He was a hollow shell of his usual self, he had no explosion off the line. So not having him isn't necessarily all that different from last season That said, they resigned Anthony Spencer, who missed all of last season, which has gone under the radar - assuming he stays healthy this year, that's a great move. Even before his breakout season in 2012, he was a stellar run stopper. They also signed Henry Melton, another guy who needs to bounce back from injury, but definitely has potential to fill the gap left by Jason Hatcher.

The LB corps is going to hurt, especially without Sean Lee. He's the heart and soul of that defense, and when he got hurt (every year) the defense took a nosedive. They did actually sign a replacement for him this season. I'm not saying Rolando McClain is that good (he's probably been arrested already), but it's better than the last two years when Lee went down and there was no one to fill the void.

However, most important of all - demoting Monte Kiffin. Remember 2011-2012? The Cowboys defense wasn't all that bad under Rob Ryan, with largely the same guys. When he was inexplicably hired, and Kiffin inexplicably hired, the unit went down hard and fast. They may not have brought back Ryan, but just the fact that Kiffin isn't calling the shots anymore will make a huge difference. The guy could barely stay awake through games, let alone actually call an NFL defense.

So yea. The Cowboys defense won't be good. But I consider it highly unlikely that it will be worse than last year if they can even stay somewhat healthy, and all this "worst defense in history" and "barely college level" stuff is silly. They weren't even the worst in the league last year! In yards, yes, but points are what really matter, and they were 26th in that category a year ago.

If they're smart (which they aren't) they'll run the ball hard and often. They've got a great offensive line and a good running back, the best way to help out your weak defense is to keep it off the field. So if they actually wise up and run the ball a little more, I don't see why they won't be at least as good, if not maybe a little better, than they were a season ago. That's why I have them at 9-7, not at the bottom of the division.
 
Last edited:

Phoenix86

Lifer
May 21, 2003
14,643
9
81
With all those question marks on D, you still managed to miss the DBs.

Scandrick's suspension, which means we're rolling out Carr and Claibourn for the first 4 games and depth isn't there either if something happens.

Church is good, Wilcox is another question mark.

The up-side is we're getting several players back in the 2-4 week area (injuries/suspensions).
 

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,215
11
81
The secondary isn't really changed from last year. It's not great, but it's not the biggest question mark - the front seven is where all the questions lie. Besides, who knows, Caliborne and Wilcox could have breakout years. They're young yet. I wouldn't count on it, but it could happen.
 

SP33Demon

Lifer
Jun 22, 2001
27,929
142
106
I think you are still underestimating the impact Desean had on the offense, and I fully agree with the earlier poster that preseason stats are largely meaningless. They added some role players on defense, sure, but let's not forget just how bad their defense looked at times last year... Role players alone don't turn that into an elite unit.
Preseason isn't completely meaningless, esp going against 1st team snaps for defensive guys. While their secondary was a liability last year, it may not be this year and I showed you the players (Allen and Wolff) who could solidify it. Also, like I said before, if that team becomes a top 5 run stop D then the safeties are going to have it easy on passing downs (no guessing at all) which will relieve pressure off of everyone by forcing the other team to throw more than they run.

Interesting that you picked them to finish last and they won the division last year. At least you acknowledged they have a very high percent to win it again. A couple of other things:
1) Losing 1 guy on a team isn't going to change much.
2) They are a rushing team, not a passing one.
3) Yes, Desean opened up some space but who cares when Ertz can run routes like a champ and make them respect him.

You're also forgetting that Jordan Matthews is almost as fast as Desean (4.40 vs 4.35 40, 2.61 vs 2.53 20, 1.55 vs 1.55 10, 10' vs 10' broad jumps) and much bigger (6-3/212lbs vs 6-0/178lbs), stronger (225lbsX21reps vs 3reps) with a higher vertical (35.5" vs 34.5"). From a measurables standpoint, he's got speed + the size that Desean never had and Philly desperately needed. For example, why did Desean choke hard in his two games against rival Dallas last year? Because he was too small - Week 7 he posted a -2.2 (3-8, 21yds) and in Week 17 -0.6 (3-4, 28yds). The smaller backs on Dallas (5-10 Scandrick, 6-0 Carr) had no problem defending his targets (they defended 10 of 12) and owned him. That doesn't happen with a 6-3 receiver like Matthews which will create a big matchup problem for Dallas. Who is Dallas going to put on him? Claiborne? 5-11. Aside from the fact that Matthews' vertical is > all 3 of those midgets (Claiborne@35"), on a jump ball they are at a serious disadvantage. Other options - Tyler Patmon? 5-10. Wilcox? 6-0. Green? 5-11. Nobody else worth mentioning. Philly finally has a weapon that Dallas will have no answer for. Good riddance Desean Chokeson.
 
Last edited:

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,215
11
81
I mean I picked the Eagles to go to the Superbowl during the 2011 "dream team" year and we all know how that ended up Anyway, could Jordan Matthews fill the void? Sure - but he's a rookie. They don't always work out the way you expect. You know who else was a physical freak? Matt Jones. 6'6, 242, 4.37 40, 40" vertical. How did he work out in the NFL? Granted he was a "project" from the start - you can't just say "Hey, I'm going to take my superstar, dump him, draft a guy, and say from the preseason that I've improved that slot because he looked good at the combine". It just doesn't work that way in the NFL. Your rookies might work out this year. Maybe in 3-4 years. Maybe never.

Like I said earlier, it's not just the stats Desean puts up - it's the presence. Teams gameplan around him. They have to keep a safety over the top just in case he gets past the jam (yes, clearly his weakness). Even when he got shut out, he still had an impact on the game.

Hey, be happy, I have the Eagles winning the division this year - I just can't quite understand why some fans are so sure that they're not only as good as last year, they're far better. It's way too early to make that claim based off of rookies and the preseason.
 

Zargon

Lifer
Nov 3, 2009
12,240
2
76
Lion's should win the NFC North....

LOL its possible, but still funny to think about, the door was left wide open for them last year and they still walked into a wall

Umm...Randal Cobb?

As far as safties go...how can you go wrong with a guy named Ha Ha?

I forgot about Ha Ha(who the bears should have drafted)

sorry jury is still out on Cobb, hes had a single good year, an OK one(his rookie) and he was out most of last year. his big year there was a lot of other talent on the field that has now left GB




and all I can say after last night is.....I guess the Zach miller hype factory was right. dude was pretty amazing
 
Last edited:

Perknose

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 9, 1999
46,282
9,367
146
They added some role players on defense, sure, but let's not forget just how bad their defense looked at times last year... Role players alone don't turn that into an elite unit.

Missing from your statement is "at times" was mostly in the first half of the season. The Eagles 'D' improved markedly as the season wore on. While their D isn't exactly a strength overall, I think the arc of improvement it followed last year will continue this year, and help keep them in games.


Hey, be happy, I have the Eagles winning the division this year - I just can't quite understand why some fans are so sure that they're not only as good as last year, they're far better. It's way too early to make that claim based off of rookies and the preseason.

Imho, DeSean had a career year principally due to being a beneficiary of Chip's system (as did Shady.) So . . . DeSean is gone but the system remains. A key question is which side wins the spy vs spy leapfrog -- defensive coordinators facing the Iggles or Kelly? I'm putting my chips on Chip. He's added weapons in Sproles, Ertz as a break-out all-pro candidate, and, hopefully, a healthy and productive Maclin. DeSean is one highly talented gnome, but also an immature, narcissistic meathead. He's PERFECT for the Washington Native Americans!

That said, I do see 11 wins and one playoff victory as dem Iggles ceiling. And, hell, that works for me.

Finally, I'd like to add that I've always admired your giant cojones for posting these predictions, Deeko. In that respect, you 'da man! :thumbsup:
 
Last edited:

Imported

Lifer
Sep 2, 2000
14,679
23
81
Still picking the 49ers. If they make the playoffs, they'll be the most rested at the least..
 

angminas

Diamond Member
Dec 17, 2006
3,331
26
91
Super...Bowl. Two words. It's not hard. What the fuck is wrong with you people?

Oh, and, barring injuries or alien abductions, Seahawks are going to repeat. Maybe the best team I've ever seen.
 

DrPizza

Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Mar 5, 2001
49,606
166
111
www.slatebrookfarm.com
Slightly curious, OP. How do you propose that the total games you predict to be won is so much different than the total games you predict to be lost?
 

BUTCH1

Lifer
Jul 15, 2000
20,433
1,769
126
Looks like some pretty solid picks again by Deeko, as usual injuries will determine how well any given team will do and sometimes a 2nd stringer can come from the bench and play far above expectations and surprise everyone. Now that week one is about to start I'm stuck watching the Jag's games due to NFL rules about showing "home" teams games even if almost everyone in central FL would much rather watch the Dolphins. Can anyone hook me up with a decent streaming site to watch other games??, IDK if it's against forum policy to post link's to streaming sites since technically it is watching a game illegally, if so it would be much app. if someone could send me a PM with the link(s) and remove me from football hell that is the Jag's. I would gladly pay the NFL on a PPV basis to watch the game I want but we all know that is not possible in North America due to the Direct TV contract which forbids the NFL from doing so.
 

Perknose

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 9, 1999
46,282
9,367
146
Slightly curious, OP. How do you propose that the total games you predict to be won is so much different than the total games you predict to be lost?

Oh, Deeko, oh. Looks like the Good Doctor has gotten your goat! :biggrin: :awe: ()
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |