Deeko's 2016 NFL Predictions!

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,213
11
81
Hello, football fans! We're back, just in time for the start of the 2016 NFL Season! After a year where I picked the Panthers to go 6-10 and the Cowboys to go 11-5, I'm ready for another year of predictions! I'll forgo the caveats - by now you know them, and you'll ignore them anyway, so on with the picks!

NFC East

Dallas Cowboys (8-8) – Tony Romo is already out. Prescott already looks better than any of their backups last year, but he’s still a rookie. Elliott should provide a shot in the arm to the running game and take pressure off Prescott, but the defense wasn’t great last year and didn’t get better.
New York Giants (7-9) – A lot of flux in the Giants lately, but can they really come together? Eli Manning has looked worse and worse each year, but he’s still throwing to one of the best young receivers in the league, so they’ll move the ball through the air. Made moves to improve a woefully bad defense, but I don’t think it will be enough to turn the franchise around.
Washington Redskins (7-9) – Putting a lot of eggs in the Kirk Cousins basket. I don’t see it. Alfred Morris hasn’t looked great, but are they better without him? Josh Norman was a surprising and good pick for the defense, but I think he was a bit overrated. They won the division last year on the strength of it being a dumpster fire, which it still is, so they’ve got a shot…but I just don’t see Cousins taking them that far.
Philadelphia Eagles (6-10) – Trading Sam Bradford was an incredible future-looking move for the Eagles. They took advantage of a desperate Vikings team, but likely mortgaged their season in the process. Wentz might be good someday (if he doesn’t get locked in the bathroom), but a middling running game, weak receiving core, and blah defense won’t do much for Pederson’s first year.

NFC North

Green Bay Packers (12-4) – A lot of people, myself included, said the Packers would be fine no matter who was at WR as long as Rodgers was throwing the ball. Apparently that’s not true, he’s human after all. Assuming health is better than 2015, they should bounce back and win the division, especially given the QB situation in Minnesota.
Minnesota Vikings (8-8) – Oof. Bridgewater goes down, Bradford comes in, has to learn the offense in a week. Good luck. Peterson is still superhuman, but he’s getting older, he can’t keep doing this forever. They still have a strong running game, but the QB situation is going to drag them down.
Chicago Bears (6-10) – The receiving corps should make strides this year, but a bad offensive line, no running game, and the always inconsistent Jay Cutler is going to lead to a pretty slow offense. The defense isn’t bad up front, but it won’t be enough to carry the team.
Detroit Lions (5-11) – Calvin Johnson made this team a factor every game, you never knew when he was going to explode. He’s gone now and there’s not much else special left behind. They should struggle.


NFC South

Carolina Panthers (11-5) – Cam Newton exploded last year on his way to the MVP and the Super Bowl. I don’t think they’ll be as solid this year, not because I think they lost all that much (I already said I thought Norma was overrated), more because I think last year was a bit of overachieving. The division still isn’t great so they still have a good chance to win it, but I don’t see them repeating.
Atlanta Falcons (10-6) – Atlanta was a funny team last year, starting strong then fading fast, all the while being the only team to knock off the Panthers in the regular season. Freeman looked great and I expect the offense to be solid, the defense is young and not exactly top tier but I do expect some improvement as they come together.
New Orleans Saints (7-9) – Drew Brees is still Drew Brees, but the defense was just completely horrendous last year. Brees is getting older, the other offensive weapons aren’t anything to write home about, and the defense isn’t really better yet. The interior line should be solid but that’s about it.
Tampa Bay Buccaneers (6-10) – Wintston looked great as a rookie QB, they can run the ball, but there isn’t a lot else to like about this team. The offensive line can’t protect the quarterback, which is never good for a young QB, and the defense isn’t going to stop many people.


NFC West

Seattle Seahawks (11-5) – Losing Lynch is going to hurt this team in more ways than one. A young, unproven corps of backs running behind a bad offensive line is going to make for busy days for Russell Wilson, who improved a lot last year. The defense isn’t as deep as it used to be, but they’re still the scariest set of starters in the league.
Arizona Cardinals (10-6) - A lot of people have the Cardinals in the Super Bowl this year. I just don’t see it. They’re still solid, Palmer can still play, the secondary is still great, but on the whole the team isn’t getting any younger – in fact their best offseason acquisition is 34. They’ll be good, but I see them stepping back, not forward.
LA Rams (5-11) – Goff and LA may be the future, but it won’t be 2016. Gurley is a stud, but the line is inexperienced and hasn’t lived up to its billing. The defense was solid last year, but lost a few players which won’t help, especially if they’re on the field more. They will struggle.
San Francisco 49ers (4-12) – The 49ers coaching carousel continues on to Chip Kelly. How the mighty have fallen. In just a few short years Kelly went from potentially revolutionizing the game with his high-pace offense to falling flat and being fired. I don’t think San Fran has the tools he needs to succeed.

AFC East

Buffalo Bills (11-5) – The Bills were pleasantly surprising last year despite an off-season by LeSean McCoy. The offensive line is decent, the line is strong, Sammy Watkins is starting to live up to his billing, and Taylor exceeded expectations. Combined with the issues in New England, I see them taking the east.
New England Patriots (9-7) – Call me crazy but I see an off year for the Patriots. Brady’s suspension will hurt the start of the season, and they lost some solid players on defense. Sure, sure, the Patriots have been retooling and replacing players forever. It’s nothing new. I just see them coming down a notch this season.
New York Jets (8-8) – Overachieved last season, any team that’s holding their breath that Ryan Fitzpatrick will sign an extension can’t be taken too seriously, can it? Added Forte to the offense, but he’s not the force he used to be. Revis is back to anchor a decent defense, but in a stronger division, I don’t see them repeating last year’s success.
Miami Dolphins (5-11) – The defensive line sounds great but they’re all old and underperforming. Byron Maxwell has always been overrated and he showed it in Philly. Tannehill will never be more than just ok. Meh.

AFC North

Pittsburgh Steelers (14-2) – If Roethlisberger holds up this team is monstrous on offense. Bell is a beast, Antonio Brown is unstoppable, and while the line isn’t great, it’s a lot better than it used to be. The defense is very un-Pittsburgh like so they’ll see their share of shootouts, but a combination of great passing game and running game should be enough to put them over the top.
Cincinnati Bengals (10-6) – Dalton took some strides last season, but another one and done year for the Bengals. They are solid all around, with a few exceptional pieces like AJ Green. However, year in and year out they’re predicted to turn the corner, and it just never seems to happen. Why should this be the one?
Baltimore Ravens (8-8) – A horde of injuries led to a big let-down season or the Ravens. Flacco never lived up to his elite billing, but the rest of the offense is reasonable, if not flashy. The defense is certainly not the force it used to be, but Suggs coming back will give them a big boost. They’ll be better this season, but that’s not saying much.
Cleveland Browns (4-12) – I think RGIII got a bad deal in Washington and I think he’s an improvement here for the Browns. Unfortunately, the rest of the team is still terrible so that doesn’t matter.


AFC South

Indianapolis Colts (11-5) – Losing one of the top QBs in the league is enough to sink any season, but it wasn’t just bad…Luck…that got them there. The offensive line was horrendous and they paid the price. They’re trying to address it, but it still won’t be great, and the defense is still pretty bad. The return of Luck should boost them back to the top of a pretty bad division, but they won’t go much farther than that.
Houston Texans (8-8) – I perennially underrate the Texans, and this will be no exception. They have the best defensive player in the game, with solid talent around him, but the offense just doesn’t scare anyone. A stronger Colts team knocks them out of the playoffs.
Jacksonville Jaguars (8-8) – Every year seems to be the Jags year that they’re finally going to turn it around, and every year is disappointing. Bortles and Hurns showed some good chemistry last year, they added several solid free agents, and the draft should bolster the defense. They’ll be better, and they’re young so the potential is there, but I don’t see them really turning the corner in 2016.
Tennessee Titans (4-12) – Adding DeMarco Murray helps this team. Sure, he underwhelmed in Philly, but that was as much Chip Kelly’s fault as his own. Even still, Mariota failed to impress, and the defense isn’t anything special. It’s possible the young offensive line comes together and helps them put together a decent enough offense, but I wouldn’t count on it.


AFC West

Denver Broncos (11-5) – The Broncos won the Super Bowl on the strength of the best defense in the AFC (and possibly the league), despite starting the aging mummy that was Peyton Manning. People seem worked up over their QB situation, but come on…last year wasn’t exactly stellar. As long as they can minimize the mistakes, as Peyton did, they’ll still be solid.
Kansas City Chiefs (9-7) – The Chiefs finished on a great run last season, the opposite of what a Reid team usually does…only to have his old nemesis, clock management, strike them down in the postseason. Alex Smith is always underrated, and they do have a strong defense, but I expect them to
Oakland Raiders (8-8) – Derek Carr looked great last year, and they played behind a surprisingly stout line. Similarly, the defense was better than expected last season, too. Still, the offensive weapons left something to be desired, and I’m not sure they’ll continue their upward trend this season.
San Diego Chargers (5-11) – Phillip Rivers can still play, but not quite at the level he used to…or it could just be the fact that the rest of this team was terrible, and doesn’t look a lot better this season.
average to somewhere between their poor start and strong finish.


Playoffs

Wild Card

Falcons @ Panthers
Cardinals @ Cowboys
Patriots @ Colts
Bengals @ Bills

Divisional Round

Cardinals @ Packers
Panthers @ Seahawks
Patriots @ Steelers
Bills @ Broncos

Championship Round

Seahawks @ Packers
Broncos @ Steelers

Super Bowl

Steelers vs Seahawks

A rematch of Super Bowl XL...unfortunately for the great Northwest, I don't see it ending much differently.

Previous years:
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006

ARE YOU READY FOR SOME FOOTBALL??
 

Ken g6

Programming Moderator, Elite Member
Moderator
Dec 11, 1999
16,360
4,066
75
Denver Broncos (11-5) – The Broncos won the Super Bowl on the strength of the best defense in the AFC (and possibly the league), despite starting the aging mummy that was Peyton Manning. People seem worked up over their QB situation, but come on…last year wasn’t exactly stellar. As long as they can minimize the mistakes, as Peyton did, they’ll still be solid.
Funny, that's exactly the numbers I came up with looking over the Broncos' season. I figure the first three games will be losses, followed by lots of wins, until losses vs the Pats and @ KC
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,136
30,086
146
worst thread ever! Deeko raped the pope!

There, I think that covers the next 30 or 40 replies....
 
Reactions: Deeko

1sikbITCH

Diamond Member
Jan 3, 2001
4,194
574
126
I know it's hard to investigate and learn about 32 different teams but it would make it seem better than just a guess.
 

BALIstik916

Senior member
Jan 28, 2007
755
0
71
Not sure why everyone is picking the 49ers to regress. They can't possibly go lower than that miserable, greasy, sweat-filled piece of crap with a moustache that disguised himself as a head coach last season.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,136
30,086
146
Not sure why everyone is picking the 49ers to regress. They can't possibly go lower than that miserable, greasy, sweat-filled piece of crap with a moustache that disguised himself as a head coach last season.

Blaine.


Gabbert.
 

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,213
11
81
Yea. When they signed Chip Kelly, as much as I think the NFL has figured out his system, and his system is too strenuous for a 16 game NFL season - I did think Kaepernick was the right QB for it. But they're playing Gabbert, so...we'll see. Doesn't help that they're in a strong division with defenses that will pummel them.
 

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,024
5,905
126
Came here just to verify that Cowboys were still delusionally picked as #1 in NFCE.

Did not leave disappointed.
 
Reactions: KMFJD

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,213
11
81
The NFC East is a dumpster fire - any team could win and it doesn't matter because they'll get smashed in the 1st round of the playoffs. But your critical analysis is always appreciated, glad to see you put a lot of thought into your reply.
 

gorcorps

aka Brandon
Jul 18, 2004
30,739
452
126
Funny, that's exactly the numbers I came up with looking over the Broncos' season. I figure the first three games will be losses, followed by lots of wins, until losses vs the Pats and @ KC

First one was a win! An ugly win, but it's still a win!
 

Ken g6

Programming Moderator, Elite Member
Moderator
Dec 11, 1999
16,360
4,066
75
First one was a win! An ugly win, but it's still a win!
Yep. Gives the Broncos a little leeway in games I'm not sure about, like Atlanta and Houston. Not to mention how the division may be getting better.
 

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
23,085
21,204
136
Giants homer here. You are off on Eli Manning. Since Macadoo came on-board 2 years ago and installed his offense, Eli has looked better and better. The opposite of him looking worse and worse. Check his stats year to year. They show some of his career best numbers, not to mention I watch all the games and he's been looking solid these last 2 years.
 

Perknose

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 9, 1999
46,568
9,939
146
Giants homer here. You are off on Eli Manning. Since Macadoo came on-board 2 years ago and installed his offense, Eli has looked better and better. The opposite of him looking worse and worse. Check his stats year to year. They show some of his career best numbers, not to mention I watch all the games and he's been looking solid these last 2 years.
Eagles fan who "hates" the Giants: I definitely concur with Mr. Squish. Eli's last two years have been some of his best.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,136
30,086
146
Giants homer here. You are off on Eli Manning. Since Macadoo came on-board 2 years ago and installed his offense, Eli has looked better and better. The opposite of him looking worse and worse. Check his stats year to year. They show some of his career best numbers, not to mention I watch all the games and he's been looking solid these last 2 years.

Indeed, I was thinking the same about Eli (and I don't like that putz. ). Deeko's interpretation of the Skins/Cousins and what is going on with Seattle and their RB corps (I guess he forgot about that Rawls guy....) makes me think he pulled some of these write-ups out of his CrackerJax box.
 

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,024
5,905
126
He's a Dallas homer so you can't really blame him for his predictions of the NFCE. Every year for the past 2 decades I've thought the Redskins had a shot to win their division lol. Clearly I've been disappointed, as you can see from my avatar.
 

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,213
11
81
Man oh man, I don't post my caveat about the NFC East / Cowboys for one season and people are already coming out of the woodwork. I swear my toddler has thicker skin and a longer memory. Anyway. Let's talk about Eli.

There's a couple of things to keep in mind here:

1) 2013 was abnormally bad, even for Eli, so its not really fair to say he's so improved because he didn't repeat that abomination.
2) Each year he's played the league has become more passer friendly
3) The last two seasons he's played with one of the best WRs in the league, capable of ridiculous circus catches, who can cover up his inaccuracies

Now, sure, he's thrown the most TDs of his careers the last two years, but he's also had a lot of turnovers (21 each season), and he's thrown the most period - his TD percentage hasn't gone up, despite the presence of ODB. When you look at his QBR vs the rest of the league, here is where he finished:

2015: 15th
2014: 12th
2013: 27th
2012: 9th
2011: 10th
2010: 12th
2009: 9th

So I don't know if I would say he's playing the best football of his career. He's throwing the most, and has the best WR he's ever had, but if you look beyond the raw stats and just watch his quality of play - he doesn't look at sharp. Not to me anyway. But hey, I've always disliked the guy, but that's how I see it.

Regarding the Seahawks, I'm not really sure where you're going with that. I have them winning more games, winning their division, and going to the Super Bowl, all around an improvement on last season, despite losing Lynch. Rawls isn't bad to fill in for him, no, but he's not Marshawn Lynch. He had a nice average but he doesn't have Lynch's power or presence in the red zone, nor is he the heart of the team. Lynch didn't say much, but the team fed off of his presence, which is gone now, Rawls isn't replacing it. Despite that, I think the Seahawks regular season was misleading last year - they were better than 10-6 indicates I'd say. But we'll see. I lived in Seattle for five of the last eight years, I know a lot of Seahawks fans - not one of them thinks they're better off without Lynch, for what it's worth.

As for the Redskins, well, we'll just have to wait and see what happens. I'm not a believer in Cousins, but he's young, things can change, for better or worse. Of course its possible to see them winning the NFC East, the NFC East is terrible. Any of the four teams could easily win, but it's not really saying much. I've got all four between 6-10 and 8-8 so its not like I'm calling for the Redskins to plummet to nothing and the Cowboys to be the 1st seed in the conference.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,136
30,086
146
Regarding the Seahawks, I'm not really sure where you're going with that. I have them winning more games, winning their division, and going to the Super Bowl, all around an improvement on last season, despite losing Lynch. Rawls isn't bad to fill in for him, no, but he's not Marshawn Lynch. He had a nice average but he doesn't have Lynch's power or presence in the red zone, nor is he the heart of the team. Lynch didn't say much, but the team fed off of his presence, which is gone now, Rawls isn't replacing it. Despite that, I think the Seahawks regular season was misleading last year - they were better than 10-6 indicates I'd say. But we'll see. I lived in Seattle for five of the last eight years, I know a lot of Seahawks fans - not one of them thinks they're better off without Lynch, for what it's worth..

Hey, this guy thinks they were the best team overall last year!
http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/teameff

Fivethirtyeight has the NFCE totally reversed
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-nfc-east-will-be-an-ugly-magnificent-bloodbath-as-usual/
 

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,213
11
81
Long season, we'll see. Every single year fans of team [x] whine that I didn't follow their team hard enough and don't understand that [y] is going to make them amazing. I'm not a football analyst; I definitely don't follow your team as much as you do. But that's not the point of this thread. If you want that level of analysis, go read Barnwell or a someone of that ilk.
 

Perknose

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 9, 1999
46,568
9,939
146
Deeko, you are the OG artist in this thread, throwing your pearls before us swine. It takes entirely undeflated balls to do what you do. Cheers!
 
Reactions: Ken g6

Fingolfin269

Lifer
Feb 28, 2003
17,948
31
91
I'm not quite sure what you watched last year, or what your expectations are for a rookie QB with a shit team, but Mariota looked pretty good last year. Still lacking weapons though, unlike Jameis who somehow walked into a pretty good situation on offense. Speaking of Jameis, I'm not sure why he looked great to you last year but Mariota failed to impress. How much did you actually watch of these guys?

Per game in 2015 (Winston played 16 and Mariota basically played 11 (I discounted stats from 12 since he got knocked out early):
Jameis - 250 yds 1.375 td / 1 int / 58% / 13 yds rushing / 0.375 td rushing
Mariota - 253 yds 1.73 td / 0.9 int / 64% / 23 yds rushing / 0.18 td rushing

Looks pretty even to me even though Jameis definitely had the better weapons surrounding him.

Anyway, today was a different story. Jameis had a good game. Mariota also had a good game as well sans a pretty bad decision that led to a pick 6. Ultimately it looks like both of these guys have a chance to be good long term but Mariota definitely needs a big WR like Mike Evans soon.
 
Last edited:
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |