Unfortunately the Constitution isn't magic, and is dependent on humans to apply the words contained therein. Simply being forbidden doesn't stop them from doing it unless someone stops them from doing it.No 3rd term, the constitution forbids it. It would need an amendment that's impossible to pass. Not only that, the withering lout will be around 82 and would term out at 86. His lackeys lack credibility. Everybody knows that. He's backed lots of people who lost, he's really good at picking shithead-losers.
If Trump wants, can get rid of the Constitution with a new one, the problem? opposition and that leads into the failure of the countryUnfortunately the Constitution isn't magic, and is dependent on humans to apply the words contained therein. Simply being forbidden doesn't stop them from doing it unless someone stops them from doing it.
No 3rd term, the constitution forbids it. It would need an amendment that's impossible to pass. Not only that, the withering lout will be around 82 and would term out at 86. His lackeys lack credibility. Everybody knows that. He's backed lots of people who lost, he's really good at picking shithead-losers.
Why bother with all that work when they could just ignore it?If Trump wants, can get rid of the Constitution with a new one, the problem? opposition and that leads into the failure of the country
Yes, it doesn't get as many direct views, but the headlines and topics do filter to social media and whatnot. The media can raise and hammer the salience of a particular issue and give it appropriate framing if they are willing.“Media” only reaches about 17.5-24 million people during prime time. That’s roughly 720 million views a month versus 1.7 billion views a month for YouTube’s top 10 creators. We aren’t even talking about social media yet. It’s hard to blame the media when barely anyone is watching it.
No 3rd term, the constitution forbids it.
Law and order is only a concept that carries any meaning while there are principled people with power, influence and most importantly willingness to defend it.No 3rd term, the constitution forbids it. It would need an amendment that's impossible to pass.
Not only that, the withering lout will be around 82 and would term out at 86. His lackeys lack credibility. Everybody knows that. He's backed lots of people who lost, he's really good at picking shithead-losers.
You're mad, the constitution died weeks ago.No 3rd term, the constitution forbids it. It would need an amendment that's impossible to pass. Not only that, the withering lout will be around 82 and would term out at 86. His lackeys lack credibility. Everybody knows that. He's backed lots of people who lost, he's really good at picking shithead-losers.
It's faster to break stuff than fix stuff:
IMO the US at best is starting a cycle whereby the GQP slashes and burns everything it touches, the electorate decides that in 2028 that it doesn't like the GQP anymore, the Dems half-heartedly fix stuff, the electorate forgets about what two Trump administrations have done and decides that it doesn't like the price of something else by then so it votes the GQP in again, rinse and repeat until the US ceases to be a developed country.
I'm not sure whether memory is really the biggest issue here, as you say it's propaganda.Of course, it's the American voter's short attention span and even shorter memory that perpetuates that cycle. Add to that how easy it is to fill their minds with fake scary terrible things that the liberals are doing to the country and oh how convenient it is that just by coincidence it's the Republican party who's spreading these fake horror stories that can fix it all up. And it works because these same voters are a lazy bunch, not wanting to take the time to dig around for the truth and facts that would set them free from the lies and disinformation that the Republican party is filling their heads with.
AFAIK it was attacked, it didn't die. The courts are in play here. The courts deal with the constitution and precedent, yes, all the way up to the Supremes. Constitutional law is a thing. Obama was expert in it. It exists. We'll see.You're mad, the constitution died weeks ago.
AFAIK it was attacked, it didn't die. The courts are in play here. The courts deal with the constitution and precedent, yes, all the way up to the Supremes. Constitutional law is a thing. Obama was expert in it. It exists. We'll see.
Trump's Pratorians?
AFAIK it was attacked
Was this spelling intentional?
Amazing -- as a former fed who got moved around or across country at least twice -- I didn't even think of that component of possible loss.
The clerics of the supreme court have shown time and again they'll Calvinball the law into backing this right wing coup.AFAIK it was attacked, it didn't die. The courts are in play here. The courts deal with the constitution and precedent, yes, all the way up to the Supremes. Constitutional law is a thing. Obama was expert in it. It exists. We'll see.
SCOTUS pretty much kicked the legs out of that proposition.Unfortunately the Constitution isn't magic, and is dependent on humans to apply the words contained therein. Simply being forbidden doesn't stop them from doing it unless someone stops them from doing it.
If that's true and doesn't stop the USA won't recover much less become "great," which it never was IMO.The clerics of the supreme court have shown time and again they'll Calvinball the law into backing this right wing coup.