Originally posted by: Sadhu
What I'm saying is that I'm not sure I prefer the 2005FP to 2001FP, at least not as certain that I'ved lived with them both for a little while. The larger size of the 2001FP is certainly a huge plus the more I live with it. Acutally, for my PC use as a desktop monitor, I think the 2001FP is a smarter way to go, since the I can still get most windows side by side on the FP but have the advantage of greater area from top to bottom, which in day to day use is perhaps the more productive to have than greater width. Those who use for video might feel differently.
And, having more detail or at least the impression of more detail due ot the fact colors seem less washed out and more true on the 2001FP might signal a shift in preference for the FP over the FPw. I think the difference is slight, mind you, but it is annoying to drag something in either direction and see that colors shift enough to bring to mind that colors seem better on the FP.
Sadhu,
What's the brightness level of your 2001FP? Mine is still 50. If you still concern the color saturation, you could try to download this image.
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/wallpa...pia04234-1600-1200.jpg
It's an image wallpaper from JPL. The resolution is 1600x1200. I set it as an desktop image and the image is very sharp. So does the color saturation. I think you should be able to see the differences (if any) on your 2001 & 2005..