I wonder how many who have watched Clinton cash bothered fact checking it?
19 Trillion of debt is not a fact? Do tell.
So tell me more about how more ILLEGALS will be good for the US children?
Do tell. Spin baby spin.
Can you tell me why 19 trillion in debt is bad?
I asked this question before and so far, no one was about to answer.
Do tell me one country or empire since the begin of civilization that was able to borrow and spend to prosperity/better future. Just one.
Nothing about the million and million of unskilled ILLEGALS? Nothing at all?
I asked this question before and so far, no one was about to answer.
Do tell me one country or empire since the begin of civilization that was able to borrow and spend to prosperity/better future. Just one.
Why is it that you aren't worthy of a rational answer...
Answer: Because you're not rational.
So now can't dispute with what I said as facts, so now pull the "not rational" card?
Unless you have something new to say beside the bullcrap you are pulling, I have nothing for your weak sauce.
The US, in 1946 we had a debt to gdp ratio of 121.70%. Your turn!
See my edit "years and year".
IIRC, the US debt went down after WWII and of course, our economy after WWII was booming big time because Europe and Asia and very much everywhere else were in ruins.
ivwshane just burned your ass, motherfucker....:biggrin:
See my edit "years and year".
IIRC, the US debt went down after WWII and of course, our economy after WWII was booming big time because Europe and Asia and very much everywhere else were in ruins.
You called that burned? Stupid motherfucker that you really are. At least he was trying to debate.
The US, in 1946 we had a debt to gdp ratio of 121.70%. Your turn!
Oops I forgot to answer your immigration question! In 1986 Reagan signed the amnesty Bill letting about three million illegals become legal followed by growth in the economy.
ivwshane just burned your ass, motherfucker....:biggrin:
Grown economy because of those ILLEGALS? Really? Then you need to tell Greece and other countries currently in recession that they need to get more ILLEGALS.
Why 19T debt is bad? Because you can't borrow and spend to prosperity, not for years and years.
Greece has other problems other than illegals.
So what number or percentage of gdp do you think is ok for the debt ratio!
I'm trying to picture an adult typing that.
Uh, besides Japan being one country, there is really an overwhelming consensus that one of Japan's primary problems economically is not enough immigrants of at least some sort in combination with a low birth rate. Basically the reason Japan doesn't have more immigrants appears to be social and limitations with absorbing them presumably combined with domestic politics. The US doesn't have to end up going the same route.What about Brazil? Why not scoop up all of those ILLEGALS? Other countries in Europe and Japan are not doing great either, why don't they scoop up more ILLEGALS if that would grown their economies as you claimed.
What about Brazil? Why not scoop up all of those ILLEGALS? Other countries in Europe and Japan are not doing great either, why don't they scoop up more ILLEGALS if that would grown their economies as you claimed.
I want the debt to be stable and plan to reduce it. No, I am not saying we have to do it cold turkey and right away or within a short few years. ANd no, I am not saying the sky will be falling soon. What I am saying is we can not continue with the same current path because it will not be a good future for the children. But of course, it will not be fun or popular so D and R just kick the can down the road and raise the debt ceiling, again and again.
How sure are you of this?
What about Brazil? Why not scoop up all of those ILLEGALS? Other countries in Europe and Japan are not doing great either, why don't they scoop up more ILLEGALS if that would grown their economies as you claimed.
I want the debt to be stable and plan to reduce it. No, I am not saying we have to do it cold turkey and right away or within a short few years. ANd no, I am not saying the sky will be falling soon. What I am saying is we can not continue with the same current path because it will not be a good future for the children. But of course, it will not be fun or popular so D and R just kick the can down the road and raise the debt ceiling, again and again.
Presidential candidates should be as transparent as the electorate expects them to be. Why are tax returns but not speeches in play? Both are a measure of character. Both are a measure of what influences candidates. The exposure of either keeps candidates in check.The difference, of course, is that the is a standard for all presidential candidates to release their tax returns, there is no standard for presidential (or any politician) to release transcripts of any privately held event. Lastly, as someone who has witnessed first hand what these corporate speeches look like, I am not concerned in the slightest bit about that she may have said. How many corporate speeches have you been to?
None given by Goldman but plenty of "corporate speeches" (conference breakout sessions) from the big banks, HUD, CFPB, etc. Related to compliance in mortgage banking I might add.
What double standard is there for Hillary? She said this evening that Wall Street needs to be held accountable. She received over $600k giving three speeches to an investment bank. She won't let us the voting public know what was said. And you think this is fine?