I don't disagree with you, but voting for someone with no chance is wasting your vote.*
*waste as in the independent candidate has no actual chance of winning. You're not wasting it if you want a Trump presidency.
Maybe a Trump presidency is just what the democratic party needs. It might shock them into changing the gameplan to something other than "shove the NWO candidate down their throats, regardless of what the voters want."
I think the phrase for that is cutting your nose to spite your face.
You want a Trump presidency? Because not voting for Hillary is how you get it.
And to be clear, I don't like Hillary either, but I know what I gotta do come November.
I don't know how any reasonable person can like either candidate, honestly, but I do dislike Hillary a great deal, so whatever I end up doing, I won't be voting for her.
When Debbie Schultz proudly shouted that we'd see her on Hillary's campaign trail, I was just so repulsed, that despite how much Trump bothers me on some things, I have to admit that I can barely look at a picture of Hillary without cringing now.
Maybe a Trump presidency is just what the democratic party needs. It might shock them into changing the gameplan to something other than "shove the NWO candidate down their throats, regardless of what the voters want."
NWO! OMFG! Wasn't that the reason for Jade Helm? It's a damned good thing that the Texas governor sent out troops to stop it or we'd all be living under Sharia Law!
It might shock them into changing the gameplan to something other than "shove the NWO candidate down their throats, regardless of what the voters want."
I don't know how any reasonable person can like either candidate, honestly, but I do dislike Hillary a great deal, so whatever I end up doing, I won't be voting for her.
When Debbie Schultz proudly shouted that we'd see her on Hillary's campaign trail, I was just so repulsed, that despite how much Trump bothers me on some things, I have to admit that I can barely look at a picture of Hillary without cringing now.
I traveled to Asia and Europe more than a few times in the course of my career, so yeah, get bent.
Please, this whole "girl power" shit is nothing more than "go to europe, fuck a bunch of guys, don't have kids, then regret it later".
Not even close to forcing people to have kids, but the trend is moronic and the only way to make up for it is to let 12th century barbarians into our society to make up for the low birth rate. Wow, great job. So liberating. Let people in that force gays to get sex re-assignment, cut their vaginas up, iron their boobs down, stone rape victims...etc.
Right, Clinton did get the popular vote.... with the entire DNC backing her, and possibly even sabotaging her opponent, and the entire liberal media giving her the spotlight.... with all the big money going her way, while her opponent relied more on small individual donations from normal folks that don't own banks.
Right, Clinton did get the popular vote.... with the entire DNC backing her, and possibly even sabotaging her opponent, and the entire liberal media giving her the spotlight.... with all the big money going her way, while her opponent relied more on small individual donations from normal folks that don't own banks.
But you'd never vote for him anyway making you a concern troll.
Right, Clinton did get the popular vote.... with the entire DNC backing her, and possibly even sabotaging her opponent, and the entire liberal media giving her the spotlight.... with all the big money going her way, while her opponent relied more on small individual donations from normal folks that don't own banks.
You haven't shown all of those emails that show this yet.... just the one that came to nothing. Or is this just the narrative on your selection of media outlets?
One example is where the DNC CFO suggested that Bernie's faith be brought up, because it would be damaging to his vote in KY and WA...
With a gun to my head, I probably would vote for Bernie, but you'd have to kill me if you were telling me to vote for Hillary.
Awww, look at the cute little concern troll. You had no intention of voting for Bernie, so you act all concerned to try to convince people to vote in your direction. Do you have any evidence that the DNC actually did sabotage Bernie's efforts? You seemed most concerned about the religious faith angle, yet the DNC did no such thing - they just had someone who suggested the idea. Hillary beat Bernie in a landslide. And those paying attention realize that these suggestive emails were only brought forth to sabotage Hillary's candidacy by pro-Russian factors who are in favor of Trump who appears to be in bed with the Russians.Right, Clinton did get the popular vote.... with the entire DNC backing her, and possibly even sabotaging her opponent, and the entire liberal media giving her the spotlight.... with all the big money going her way, while her opponent relied more on small individual donations from normal folks that don't own banks.
Right, Clinton did get the popular vote.... with the entire DNC backing her, and possibly even sabotaging her opponent, and the entire liberal media giving her the spotlight.... with all the big money going her way, while her opponent relied more on small individual donations from normal folks that don't own banks.
Awww, look at the cute little concern troll. You had no intention of voting for Bernie, so you act all concerned to try to convince people to vote in your direction. Do you have any evidence that the DNC actually did sabotage Bernie's efforts? You seemed most concerned about the religious faith angle, yet the DNC did no such thing - they just had someone who suggested the idea. Hillary beat Bernie in a landslide. And those paying attention realize that these suggestive emails were only brought forth to sabotage Hillary's candidacy by pro-Russian factors who are in favor of Trump who appears to be in bed with the Russians.
Wait, so the liberal media conspired to help the less liberal candidate?
Have you thought this through?
So what you're saying is, that you believe that the Russians hacked the DNC (which is reasonable, since there's been various US officials who said that's what probably happened), and then leaked these emails... and you're personal reaction was to feel worried that Trump is allied with the Russians, and your response is to want to vote for the lady from the same party that was hacked by these Russians, that was sending across classified information on her own personal, unprotected email server.
I'm not going to lie, that's pretty amusing to me.
Liberalism and social justice is just a manipulation tool. None of these people actually care about that stuff.
Oh Jesus we have one of these. Define liberalism and social justice. Be specific.
So you seem to be saying that you think a US candidate is allied with the Russians but because a different US candidate had bad opsec that it's ok?
That's pretty amusing, I agree. Haha.
What I mean, is that the media is controlled by just a few big multinational companies, that don't care about the things that define liberal values in any real sense. They just use that as a means to an end.
Just like on the Republican side, they'll pander to Christian beliefs, as a means to an end.
The money wanted Hillary, so that's the narrative that was dominant in the media.