Yeah you're onto something. We need an investigation into all the double and triple voting by illegal voters!
Dems lost because of 50,000 fraudulent votes
Whatever. Get your meds checked dude.
Lets not forget that the only politician to directly commit a violent act and assault a reporter (and show how the right really feels about the First Amendment) was a republican who GOP voters rewarded by putting him into Congress. When people see violence rewarded, they realize it might be the only way certain groups listen.actually the supporter of violence is POTUS. You can't even be honest in your own thread
Your OP had nothing about tim ryan and just about dems being in trouble. I don't call a shift average of 13 points from red to blue as trouble, hence fake.
Lets not forget that the only politician to directly commit a violent act and assault a reporter (and show how the right really feels about the First Amendment) was a republican who GOP voters rewarded by putting him into Congress. When people see violence rewarded, they realize it might be the only way certain groups listen.
I deeply disagree with the Democratic view of where the country should go. I'm happy when they lose.
Most of the votes were already in by that point. If you were in Montana you wouldn't have changed your vote if the Dem did it either.Lets not forget that the only politician to directly commit a violent act and assault a reporter (and show how the right really feels about the First Amendment) was a republican who GOP voters rewarded by putting him into Congress. When people see violence rewarded, they realize it might be the only way certain groups listen.
What country are you in? Do you mean to say that the taxes paid by those at the bottom of the economic ladder are offset by welfare, Medicare/Medicaid and other government sponsored programs that primarily benefit them? Isn't that the point??People at the bottom pay negative taxes.
President or congress?shame, considering that is when this country is always most prosperous. Try to point me to a contemporary republican-lead administration that wasn't a complete disaster for this country? seriously, just one.
No, they pay negative income taxes.What country are you in? Do you mean to say that the taxes paid by those at the bottom of the economic ladder are offset by welfare, Medicare/Medicaid and other government sponsored programs that primarily benefit them? Isn't that the point??
Or are you saying that people at the bottom don't actually pay taxes? If that's what you believe, no wonder why Republicans have such contempt for them...
President or congress?
Nah, I'm worthless and a cancer. Remember?president, congress, hell, governorship. It doesn't matter. they are all fucking awful when it comes to the economy.
They've changed their "branding", they're now known as the alt-right. KKK is for the old schoolers.Why even refer to the KKK any longer, to even mention them validates them, there's only what 4,000-8,000 of them left according to the Southern Poverty Law Center, granted that's too doggone many, but they're a joke and should just be ignored as long as the organization seems to be dying.
Why even refer to the KKK any longer, to even mention them validates them, there's only what 4,000-8,000 of them left according to the Southern Poverty Law Center, granted that's too doggone many, but they're a joke and should just be ignored as long as the organization seems to be dying.
So that's an, "i cant think of one". As we figured.Nah, I'm worthless and a cancer. Remember?
Nah, I'm worthless and a cancer. Remember?
Try to point me to a contemporary republican-lead administration that wasn't a complete disaster for this country?
Yes I do.He asked you a specific question. Do you have an answer?
They've changed their "branding", they're now known as the alt-right. KKK is for the old schoolers.
No its a he isn't worth a serious reply.So that's an, "i cant think of one". As we figured.
Yes I do.
Nah, I'm worthless and a cancer. Remember?
CNN:
"The string of defeats, going back to the 2014 midterms, provides further evidence, progressives and leftists say, that -- without a uniquely talented group of candidates on the horizon -- the party will no longer be able to paper over decades of either bland or, in the case of trade deals like NAFTA, destructive economic policies."
CNN:
"The string of defeats, going back to the 2014 midterms, provides further evidence, progressives and leftists say, that -- without a uniquely talented group of candidates on the horizon -- the party will no longer be able to paper over decades of either bland or, in the case of trade deals like NAFTA, destructive economic policies."
Must've been hard work to find a line critical of democrats out of the millions disparaging your dear degen leader.