Democrats still think it's OK to attack a woman based on looks

Phynaz

Lifer
Mar 13, 2006
10,140
819
126
It's 2018. You might think we’ve moved beyond belittling women in politics for their looks. Looking at social media posts by at least a couple of Democratic strategists, you would be wrong.

Mary Treder Lang is the Republican nominee for Michigan's Secretary of State. Lang will face Democrat Jocelyn Benson in the November elections.

Instead of focusing on the differences between the candidates, her critics are lampooning a photo of her on social media.

On Twitter, political consultant Joe DiSano compared Lang’s look to that of “Curb Your Enthusiasm” character Krazee-Eyez Killa, an over-the-top aspiring rapper who purposefully warps his eyes for emphasis.

DiSano captioned the side-by-side photos:

@JoeDiSano: Crazy Eyes and Krazy Eyes Killah. Neither should be #misos #marytrederlang #migov #migop

There was nothing substantive in his criticism. It was purely a cruel personal attack.

Another political strategist on the left, TJ Bucholz, posted to Facebook the same photo to ridicule Lang. The accompanying comment read:

“Ok, maybe it’s just me, but I would read the shit out of a book entitled The Oral History Of This Mary Treder Lang Photo. So many questions: Who else was there? What photographer took the shot? What was in the background to create this expression? What comment make this look happen? How did someone sign off on it and allow it to appear on Secretary of State candidate web sites? Fascinating stuff.”

Some were quick to jump on the joke and run with it, including one person who replied:

“Easy they told her if she opens her eyes wide the wrinkles don’t show.”

Others (men and women) pushed back on the criticism replying:

“Come on, let's not be shallow. Do better than making fun of a lady's appearance.”

“Well. TJ. That’s a low blow. She’s my neighbor and my friend. She’s quite a good human. I disagree with some of her political positions. But you are way better than to berate her based on a less than ideal photo.”

This is in Michigan politics, but female candidates on both the left and right are facing sexist attacks everywhere.

Rachel Hundley, a California was threatened with photos of her in her underwear going public if she didn’t drop out of her race. Cori Bush, a Missouri Democratic candidate, was told she could never make it to Congress because her thighs were too big.

In this campaign season, there will undoubtedly be people who demean the looks of female candidates. It’s a tactic to undermine their candidacy and silence their voice.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with challenging a woman on her policy positions and public statements. However, personal attacks about hair, skin, age, beauty, etc. are signs of desperation.

DiSano and Bucholz took cheap shots and deserve to be called out.

The only way to stop these attacks, encourage thoughtful debate and ensure that women and men are treated respectfully, is to stand up to this behavior whenever it occurs.

http://iwv.org/detail.php?c=2807471...ts-Lampoon-Republican-Female-Candidates-Looks

There's how you win elections, by degrading half the electorate!

Dems blindly continue to fuck themselves, and don't even know it.
 
Reactions: SlowSpyder

Maxima1

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2013
3,522
759
146
For those interested on how Koch Brothers work to influence public opinion, this thread is an example.
We have a poster on tech forum who apparently consumes media that republishes content from feeds that pump out carefully crafted nonsense.

https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Independent_Women's_Forum
https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Independent_Women's_Voice

The thread is so fucking stupid regardless, especially considering what these Republicans asshats are doing with the Kavanaugh nomination. I'm seeing a lot of really fucked up responses that sexual assault doesn't matter, what young guy doesn't do it, etc.
 

Homerboy

Lifer
Mar 1, 2000
30,856
4,974
126
Democrats attacking women is bad.
Its rare, and never severe, but its bad.

Now that we've acknowledged it, we can go back to pointing out Republicans covering up rape on a daily basis.

To be fair, they're not really trying to "cover up rape" per se, They are basically trying to explain it away, and claim "boys will be boys". They are simply trying to legitimize rape and at the very best (worst?) undermine it and/or anyone that has been a victim of it.
 

Commodus

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2004
9,215
6,818
136
Talk about mindless, only idiots ignore facts based on the source. Should I link to the actual tweet?

Let me make it clear for you:

The issue isn't even necessarily the source. It's that IWV is spinning this as some kind of proof that all Democrats are hypocrites, and you're falling for that hook, line and sinker. You're exceptionally gullible, and too proud to admit it.

Besides, if you were consistent in your outrage, you'd be attacking Trump all day, every day, forever.
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
28,097
38,652
136
I love threads like this, where the OP sounds like a paid shill who's just emerged from a 3 year coma.

Leave it to Trump supporters. Point to the many ways in which they are disconnected from reality, and they'll go right ahead and prove you right.

Get well soon Phynaz.
 
Reactions: Muse

Phynaz

Lifer
Mar 13, 2006
10,140
819
126
Let me make it clear for you:

The issue isn't even necessarily the source. It's that IWV is spinning this as some kind of proof that all Democrats are hypocrites, and you're falling for that hook, line and sinker. You're exceptionally gullible, and too proud to admit it.

Besides, if you were consistent in your outrage, you'd be attacking Trump all day, every day, forever.

You guys have Trump covered. Why would I waste my time?
 
Reactions: imported_tajmahal

Phynaz

Lifer
Mar 13, 2006
10,140
819
126
I love threads like this, where the OP sounds like a paid shill who's just emerged from a 3 year coma.

Leave it to Trump supporters. Point to the many ways in which they are disconnected from reality, and they'll go right ahead and prove you right.

Get well soon Phynaz.


Here, I’ll use language that your type are more familiar with.

You are an idiot. I have no idea how you manage to get along in life being so incredibly stupid.
 
Reactions: imported_tajmahal

Commodus

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2004
9,215
6,818
136
You guys have Trump covered. Why would I waste my time?

Because focusing solely on Democrats, especially when you cite conservative propaganda outlets, makes your claims of being non-Republican sound questionable at best, and dishonest at worst.

One of the first things I learned about critical thinking in university: always consider the integrity of the source. IWV and IWF can never be trusted because they were not only created to spin stories for a conservative narrative, but lie about that spin (they claim they're "nonpartisan" when they're anything but).
 
Last edited:

Maxima1

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2013
3,522
759
146
Here, I’ll use language that your type are more familiar with.

You are an idiot. I have no idea how you manage to get along in life being so incredibly stupid.

Maybe I shouldn't have been as harsh, but what's the point of the thread when it's obvious which party has the problem? What do you suppose would happen if only men could vote? Thank god we have women because there would be 10x the batshit if they weren't represented in government.

https://poll.qu.edu/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=2553

2018 generic ballot All voters: D+9 Men: R+8 Women: D+25
 

interchange

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,022
2,872
136
The only thing I can conclude from this thread is that you think it's ok to take the actions of one individual as representative of the beliefs of a large class of individuals.
 
Reactions: Zorba

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
72,721
6,201
126
Given the desire and intention of the Russians under Putin to destroy Western democracy by sewing strive and dissension within our ranks, when I see posts like the OP's I see only the intention to demoralize democrats within their own ranks. I would say our dear Phynaz is a Russian plant or an unwitting victim of that form of propaganda. Once we get the Russian plant out of the White House, I am going to concern myself with weeding out sexism wherever I find it. Right now, however, I find this OP to be a distraction from more important matters. I feel quite able to walk and chew gum along the way. People with low self esteem will always be focused on physical appearance as a way to make others feel their own pain. Those who feel worthless are everywhere among us, as close as the mirror in fact. A skilled propagandists can use your self contempt to destroy you. Think about how bad people like that, who use cunning to destroy others, must actually themselves feel. They are the worst of the worst. They live of their cruelty, in psychic hell.
 
Reactions: cytg111

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
56,006
14,549
146
"Crazy Eyes?"

That's the worst the propaganda wing could come up with that has an actual source?

Crazy eyes?

Now, I'm going to ask you a question. It's a serious question.

Are you fucking serious?

Meanwhile...



 
Reactions: DAPUNISHER

umbrella39

Lifer
Jun 11, 2004
13,819
1,126
126
LOL OP is scared of a challenge to the Bashes Ugly Women throne...

Concern troll oozes concern...

GTFOOHQ
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |