You are not communicating effectively here. That aside, yes poor people are more prone to crime. MUCH more prone to crime. That does not mean that most or all poor people are criminals. You get how that's different, right?
There is a difference between being shitty at your job and outright refusing to do your job. Do you see how you are having trouble staying on target here? On top of that, just because you think the DA is bad at their job doesn't make it so. Maybe the DA is actually a good DA and you just don't actually understand all the details.
As I mentioned, data is going to be hard to find. However, many examples can be found of police making situations worse, and thus my original statement that the chances of police making things worse are high stands. It's not my fault if you interpret high as greater than 50% (ie: a majority). I never said or implied a majority. That's you constructing another straw man.
There was hyperbole in my initial post, but again you are making assumptions here on being poor and crime. Maybe being poor and doing a particular TYPE of crime is more overlapping, but being poor doesn't make someone more prone to crime. Because then you'd need to be specific and state what is "more" crime, number of acts, $ amount in damages, how many people effected or what? What's more crime, someone doing petty theft often or someone skimming credit cards or lying on their tax returns?
The cops aren't refusing to do their jobs, they are just doing it differently and apparently not to your approval. They can do other things. I'm not alone in thinking the DA's are bad, the population they serve that are recalling them speak loud enough.
Yes, lets continue to debate something you can't substantiate, brilliant.