It doesn't matter though. Even if his tax returns are 100% above board it is vital to the country to establish the principle that the president cannot hide his financial conflicts of interest from oversight. It shouldn't even be a question.
Again if you stopped requiring positive affirmation about your team loyalties all the time this would be easier. I don't support Trump, never have, didn't vote for him, would be happy if he was no longer POTUS, and plan to vote Buttigieg in the Dem primaries in 2020. I swear you guys require a ritualistic denunciation of Trump in every post before you turn your brains on and it's fucking annoying.
AND with all the above being said, I repeat what I said in my post - I highly doubt there's anything in the DB disclosures that will even move the needle in terms of either him getting impeached or re-elected. *Perhaps* there will be something revealed which mildly embarrasses him for a news cycle or two (if he's capable of being embarrassed) but even that's probably unlikely.
If after the years of him saying the most incredibly outrageous/stupid/inflammatory things and acting like a general dumbass before and after his election, you want to believe that his tax returns are going to be what finally does him in, then have at that belief. Personally I think that a man who survived "grab 'em by the pussy," and "nuke the hurricane," and every other stupid thing he's done won't even be inconvenienced in his Presidency or reelection by his tax returns.
How about in the meantime Congress stripping away any power Trump has related in dealing with Russia.
It doesn't matter though. Even if his tax returns are 100% above board it is vital to the country to establish the principle that the president cannot hide his financial conflicts of interest from oversight. It shouldn't even be a question.
Not a rumor, sweetie pie. Came out in court yesterday.I must admit, it is fun watching TDS'ers chase their tails over every rumor.
pretty sure most everyone is safe you retard. Very few people will be in the running for president of the united states. Unless you think that now that president piss baby will have to release his financials your fast food window server is gonna have to because of what? Your brain worms?
Let’s not forget the last Democrat Candidate posted nearly all of her tax returns online in a fucking searchable data base.
Which she still got shit on for doing because all the deplorable’s can’t fucking read.
I guess voters had other reasons for not pulling the lever for her. Completely unforeseeable that could have happened.
They issued him a loan signed by Russian oligarchs. That doesn’t concern you in the least given his co duct towards Russia since he’s been in office?
Don't be afraid of this new found feeling. Remember, there's a first time for everything.Well, my darned logical side of my brain just had to kick in.
And you're back!So, what if a Russian oligarch did cosign for Trump or the Trump organization before he became president...was it illegal?
Yeah. We are seeing the other side of that agreement daily.I'm to believe that a rich Russian guy promised a German bank he would pay back Trumps loan if Trump didn't? Right, because that happens all the time.
If this happened, it was part of a business transaction involving more than just a loan.
Does that mean we are seeing the quo?. My Latin sucks.Yeah. We are seeing the other side of that agreement daily.
I'm to believe that a rich Russian guy promised a German bank he would pay back Trumps loan if Trump didn't? Right, because that happens all the time.
If this happened, it was part of a business transaction involving more than just a loan.
Nobody including me is arguing that point, so I guess we can dispense with the idea that somehow this is going to be the magic bullet that removes Trump from office or means he'll lose reelection because of his tax returns?
Because the Russian guy knew Trump was going to be elected even though every single poll showed Hillary winning?Yeah. We are seeing the other side of that agreement daily.
For some reason the left seems to think that if the public knew Trump was only worth $300mm instead of $100B or something, they'll refuse to vote for him in 2020. Or that there will be a line item on his 1040 form saying "tax deductible bribe from Vladimir Putin, $10mm."
Should Trump have released his tax returns long ago? Of course. Is there going to be something in there which will be straightforward rationale to impeach or cause him to lose the election, no. Do I care if they're released and he's embarrassed, likewise no. This reminds me of the Bill Clinton days and right wing dipshits wanted to release Bubba's medical files because they were sure he had an STD and that would be what caused him to lose the election. It was stupid then, and it's likewise stupid now.
So, what if a Russian oligarch did cosign for Trump or the Trump organization before he became president...was it illegal?
I'm to believe that a rich Russian guy promised a German bank he would pay back Trumps loan if Trump didn't? Right, because that happens all the time.
If this happened, it was part of a business transaction involving more than just a loan.
And they couldn’t have looked to invest in someone they knew had both aspirations of becoming president AND extraordinary access to people of significant power? They couldn’t have known of the lengths the Russian government would go to help support this individual? Then when it really paid off they couldn’t have used that exposure to get even more influence?Because the Russian guy knew Trump was going to be elected even though every single poll showed Hillary winning?
I understand the need to vilify someone you don't like, and Trump is about as unlikable as they get, but this is all rumor. As a rule banks don't discuss loans with the media, the people getting the loans don't like it.
Because the Russian guy knew Trump was going to be elected even though every single poll showed Hillary winning?
I understand the need to vilify someone you don't like, and Trump is about as unlikable as they get, but this is all rumor. As a rule banks don't discuss loans with the media, the people getting the loans don't like it.
Win-win for the Oligarchs. Even if Trump lost they can still use him to launder money. Makes senseBecause the Russian guy knew Trump was going to be elected even though every single poll showed Hillary winning?
I understand the need to vilify someone you don't like, and Trump is about as unlikable as they get, but this is all rumor. As a rule banks don't discuss loans with the media, the people getting the loans don't like it.
Win-win for the Oligarchs. Even if Trump lost they can still use him to launder money. Makes sense
Again if you stopped requiring positive affirmation about your team loyalties all the time this would be easier. I don't support Trump, never have, didn't vote for him, would be happy if he was no longer POTUS, and plan to vote Buttigieg in the Dem primaries in 2020. I swear you guys require a ritualistic denunciation of Trump in every post before you turn your brains on and it's fucking annoying.
AND with all the above being said, I repeat what I said in my post - I highly doubt there's anything in the DB disclosures that will even move the needle in terms of either him getting impeached or re-elected. *Perhaps* there will be something revealed which mildly embarrasses him for a news cycle or two (if he's capable of being embarrassed) but even that's probably unlikely.
If after the years of him saying the most incredibly outrageous/stupid/inflammatory things and acting like a general dumbass before and after his election, you want to believe that his tax returns are going to be what finally does him in, then have at that belief. Personally I think that a man who survived "grab 'em by the pussy," and "nuke the hurricane," and every other stupid thing he's done won't even be inconvenienced in his Presidency or reelection by his tax returns.
Nobody including me is arguing that point, so I guess we can dispense with the idea that somehow this is going to be the magic bullet that removes Trump from office or means he'll lose reelection because of his tax returns?
Because the Russian guy knew Trump was going to be elected even though every single poll showed Hillary winning?
I understand the need to vilify someone you don't like, and Trump is about as unlikable as they get, but this is all rumor. As a rule banks don't discuss loans with the media, the people getting the loans don't like it.